The post U.S. Prosecutors Decide Against Retrial in OpenSea Insider Trading Case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Dismissal of the OpenSea case highlights growingThe post U.S. Prosecutors Decide Against Retrial in OpenSea Insider Trading Case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Dismissal of the OpenSea case highlights growing

U.S. Prosecutors Decide Against Retrial in OpenSea Insider Trading Case

Dismissal of the OpenSea case highlights growing limits of using traditional fraud laws in NFT insider trading cases

U.S. prosecutors have decided not to retry a former OpenSea manager after a federal appeals court overturned his criminal conviction. The decision follows months of legal review and comes after Nathaniel Chastain already served part of his original sentence. As an early attempt to apply insider trading laws to nonfungible tokens and digital assets, it drew wide attention.

DOJ Moves to Dismiss OpenSea Insider Trading Charges After Appeals Ruling

Department of Justice (DOJ) of the United States confirmed it will move to dismiss the insider trading charges against Chastain, a former product manager at OpenSea. The action follows a July ruling by a federal appeals court that reversed his wire fraud and money laundering convictions.

Prosecutors informed a Manhattan federal court that they entered a one-month deferred prosecution agreement on Wednesday. Once that period ends, charges will be formally dismissed.

Manhattan US Attorney Jay Clayton said several factors supported the decision to step away from a retrial. Those factors included the time Chastain already served, including three months in prison after his 2023 sentencing.

Chastain also agreed not to contest the forfeiture of 15.98 Ether, valued at roughly $47,330. Prosecutors alleged those funds came from trades made using nonpublic information during his time at OpenSea.

OpenSea Case Exposes Gaps in US NFT Enforcement

In 2023, a jury convicted Chastain after prosecutors accused him of using insider knowledge about NFT homepage placements. According to court records, Chastain bought NFTs shortly before they were featured on OpenSea’s homepage.

He later sold those assets after prices rose following the exposure. Defense lawyers argued that homepage placement data did not qualify as company property under federal fraud laws. Such reasoning weakened the government’s case and limited the use of older fraud laws for digital assets.

Moreover, federal appeals judges later sided with that argument and overturned the conviction in July. The ruling found that jurors received improper instructions during the trial. 

Under the deferred prosecution agreement, prosecutors will dismiss the charges if Chastain meets the stated conditions. Prosecutors said the decision reflects the time he already served and his agreement to forfeit the assets.

U.S. Pretrial Services will not supervise the former OpenSea manager once the case is formally closed. He may also apply to recover the $50,000 fine and a $200 special assessment paid after his conviction.

US OpenSea Insider Trading Case Calls for Clearer NFT Rules

Nathaniel Chastain’s prosecution marked the first US insider trading case tied to NFTs. Industry participants have since cited the reversal when calling for clearer rules around digital assets. Another NFT-related case was also overturned on appeal in recent years due to similar legal issues.

The case adds to a growing list of crypto investigations and prosecutions that have been dropped over procedural or evidentiary issues. Regulators continue to struggle with applying decades-old statutes to emerging digital assets. The outcome may guide how courts and prosecutors approach future NFT insider trading cases.

Source: https://www.livebitcoinnews.com/u-s-prosecutors-decide-against-retrial-in-opensea-insider-trading-case/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

The post SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SEI is consolidating at the $0.08 level under general downtrend pressure; although RSI
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:43
South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

The post South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief South Korean exchange Bithumb
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:16