The post If you invested $1,000 in Official Trump, here’s how much you’d be down one year later appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. While Washington, D.C. was The post If you invested $1,000 in Official Trump, here’s how much you’d be down one year later appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. While Washington, D.C. was

If you invested $1,000 in Official Trump, here’s how much you’d be down one year later

While Washington, D.C. was welcoming large crowds for President Donald Trump’s inauguration one year ago, the cryptocurrency market welcomed a series of new Trump family-themed meme coins.

Out of the digital assets unleashed for the Republican’s return to the White House, none drew more attention than OFFICIAL TRUMP (TRUMP), which soared an impressive 464% from its initial price of about $6 to approximately $37 on January 23, 2025, and then above $44 two days later.

TRUMP all-time price chart as it was on January 23, 2025. Source: Finbold

The meme coin was especially popular thanks to its direct association with the returning commander-in-chief, but also due to the apparent guarantee that the President would not sell in the form of a months-long lock period.

Here’s how much a $1,000 investment in TRUMP would have crashed

Despite the initial upsurge and the face-value guarantee, buying TRUMP would not have been the savviest investment decision except in the extreme short term. Had a trader purchased $1,000 at the earliest possible date – already on January 17, 2025 – they would have only $810 remaining at press time on January 23, 2026.

Those who waited fared even worse. An equal investment made on Inauguration Day at approximately $37 would have led to $868 in losses, with only $132 of the original investment remaining.

Indeed, OFFICIAL TRUMP coin is down 83.19% in the all-time chart if only the closing prices are accounted for, and is, at press time in early 2026, changing hands at $4.86.

TRUMP all-time price chart on January 23, 2026. Source: Finbold

At the time, in early 2025, some of the more generous observers noted TRUMP can be viewed as a novel type of commemorative coin. Simultaneously, however, such a comparison reveals that newer is not necessarily better.

Could a Gold or Silver ‘Trump coin’ have been better?

If the President opted for a more traditional type of token – one made of an ounce of gold or silver – the situation for ardent Trump supporters would have been dramatically different.

Indeed, a hypothetical gold Trump commemorative coin would have been worth $2,770 on January 20, 2025, and $4,933 at press time in 2026.

A somewhat less glamorous silver coin would have, in terms of value, performed even more impressively as it would have risen 219% from $31 to $99.

Gold and Silver 12-month price charts. Source: TradingView

A $1,000 2025 investment in DJT stock 1 year ago would have lost

Lastly, and continuing the trend, investors reluctant to participate in the cryptocurrency market but desiring to benefit from the Trump brand under the current administration would have also stepped on a mine had they purchased Trump Media & Technology (NASDAQ: DJT) stock.

DJT equity – popular as a way of betting on the victor of the latest election through much of 2024 – remained on a decisive downtrend since the billionaire politician took office. 

DJT stock 12-month price chart. Source: Finbold

Specifically, an investor would be purchasing Trump Media stock at $40 right before, or at $33 right after the inauguration, and selling at $14.69 at press time one year later for a total loss of either 63.05% or 54.78%.

Featured image via Shutterstock

Source: https://finbold.com/if-you-invested-1000-in-official-trump-heres-how-much-youd-be-down-one-year-later/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

The Future of Metalworking: Advancements and Innovations

The Future of Metalworking: Advancements and Innovations

The demand for precision and efficiency in manufacturing processes continues to rise, leading to groundbreaking advancements in metalworking. This sector constantly
Share
Techbullion2026/02/07 19:24
Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum

Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum

The post Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A crypto whale lost more than $6 million in staked Ethereum (stETH) and Aave-wrapped Bitcoin (aEthWBTC) after approving malicious signatures in a phishing scheme on Sept. 18, according to blockchain security firm Scam Sniffer. According to the firm, the attackers disguised their move as a routine wallet confirmation through “Permit” signatures, which tricked the victim into authorizing fund transfers without triggering obvious red flags. Yu Xian, founder of blockchain security company SlowMist, noted that the victim did not recognize the danger because the transaction required no gas fees. He wrote: “From the victim’s perspective, he just clicked a few times to confirm the wallet’s pop-up signature requests, didn’t spend a single penny of gas, and $6.28 million was gone.” How Permit exploits work Permit approvals were originally designed to simplify token transfers. Instead of submitting an on-chain approval and paying fees, a user can sign an off-chain message authorizing a spender. That efficiency, however, has created a new attack surface for malicious players. Once a user signs such a permit, attackers can combine two functions—Permit and TransferFrom—to drain assets directly. Because the authorization takes place off-chain, wallet dashboards show no unusual activity until the funds move. As a result, the assets are gone when the approval executes on-chain, and tokens are redirected to the attacker’s wallet. This loophole has made permit exploits increasingly attractive for malicious actors, who can siphon millions without needing complex hacks or high-cost gas wars. Phishing losses The latest theft highlights a wider trend of escalating phishing campaigns. Scam Sniffer reported that in August alone, attackers stole $12.17 million from more than 15,200 victims. That figure represented a 72% jump in losses compared with July. According to the firm, the most significant share of August’s damages came from three large accounts that accounted for nearly half…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 02:31
WHALE ALERT: $351 MILLION Bitcoin Dump Incoming

WHALE ALERT: $351 MILLION Bitcoin Dump Incoming

One crypto whale transferred 5,000 Bitcoin, which is worth about 351 million, to Binance. Ash Crypto reported this transfer. It happened only several days after
Share
Coinfomania2026/02/07 19:36