When my friend, Faruq, opens his phone to send money to Nigeria from Canada, everything feels simple. He… The post “No fee” remittances: What really happens whenWhen my friend, Faruq, opens his phone to send money to Nigeria from Canada, everything feels simple. He… The post “No fee” remittances: What really happens when

“No fee” remittances: What really happens when you send money to Nigeria

2026/01/22 14:22
7 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

When my friend, Faruq, opens his phone to send money to Nigeria from Canada, everything feels simple. He taps the app, checks the exchange rate, and hits send. Five minutes later, his family receives the money. No transfer fees. No hidden charges. At least that’s what he thinks.

There are usually no charges, hidden or not,” he tells me. He stopped using informal channels back in 2020 because fintech apps felt safer and more reliable. The rates looked better than what he used to get from people he knew. Everything happened fast. Everything seemed clear.

But Akinsola Jegede sees something different. He founded VitalSwap, a remittance fintech, and he has spent years mapping out exactly what happens when money moves between countries. According to him, most people have no idea where they actually pay.

Nigeria received over $20 billion in remittances last year. That money travels from London, Toronto, New York, and dozens of other cities into Lagos, Abuja, and villages across the country. But the journey is never as simple as it looks on your screen.

The illusion of movement

Most people imagine their money flying across the ocean. You send £100 from London, and it lands in Lagos a few minutes later. That’s not what happens.

That £100 does not move to Nigeria,” Jegede says. “It stays in the UK or enters Western Union’s global pool.”

No fees doesn't mean no cost when you send money to NigeriaHow your money flows when you send money to Nigeria

Traditional operators like Western Union work with local Nigerian banks and agents. These banks verify transactions, release cash, and reconcile balances later. They are not just banks. They are more like point-of-sale agents at a massive scale. They need infrastructure, compliance teams, and huge amounts of liquidity sitting in accounts. All of that costs money.

When you walk into a store and pay £100 plus a £6 transfer fee, that money enters a system with many hands. Western Union takes a cut. The UK bank or store agent takes a cut. The Nigerian payout bank takes a cut. Sometimes correspondent banks take a cut, too.

But the highest cost is not in those visible fees. It hides in the exchange rate.

By the time FX is applied, you’re left with something closer to £90 worth of value,” Jegede explains. You sent £100. Your family receives the equivalent of £90. The other £10 disappeared into exchange rate markups that nobody explained to you.

The fintech promise

Newer fintech entities say they are different. They claim to cut out the middlemen. Instead of a long chain of banks and agents, the structure becomes simpler. Fintech to bank to customer. That’s it.

The model works through something called local in, local out. When you send £100 from the UK, that money stays in the UK. The fintech company already has naira sitting in Nigeria. They credit your family’s account using that local liquidity. No need to wait for daily reconciliation across borders. No need for as many intermediaries.

Transactions are faster, FX is closer to the market rate, and fees are lower or sometimes zero,” Jegede says.

This matches what my friend experiences. Fast transfers. No visible fees. Rates that look better than what banks offer. He trusts the system because it works smoothly.

But Jegede insists that zero fees do not mean zero cost.

The rate you don’t see when you send money to Nigeria

Here is what most people miss. When a fintech app advertises “Send to Nigeria at ₦2,200 per pound,” they are often showing you one rate. But that might not be the rate you actually get.

Most Nigerians believe the rate for pounds to naira equals the rate for naira to pounds,” Jegede says. “It doesn’t.”

The rate advertised is often the rate for sending money from Nigeria to the UK. But you are doing the opposite. You are sending pounds to Nigeria. That transaction uses a different rate. Maybe ₦2,150 per pound. Maybe less.

The difference comes down to supply and demand. Which currency is scarce? Where is liquidity sitting? Who is holding the risk? Those factors determine the rate. And most apps know that customers assume the rates go both ways. So they advertise the better number.

Before falling for marketing ads, the real question to ask is which currency pair is being applied to my transaction,” Jegede says. “If you don’t know that, you don’t know the real cost, even if the fee is zero.”

This is probably why my friend sees no fees, but Jegede insists users still pay. The cost just moved from a transfer fee to the gap between the advertised rate and the real rate.

No fees doesn't mean no cost when you send money to NigeriaNo fees doesn’t mean no cost when you send money to Nigeria

Why it cannot be free

Even fintech entities that eliminate many middlemen still have costs. Jegede’s company had to suspend operations for eight months just to get properly licenced.

The real cost of licencing is not application fees or minimum capital requirements,” he explains. “The real cost is everything around it.”

You need lawyers. You need accountants. You need auditors. You need compliance officers. You need a team that can navigate regulations, structure the business correctly, and pass audits year after year. That team costs serious money.

So while fintech entities can charge less than Western Union’s 7-12% fees, they cannot offer truly free transfers and survive. The cost just becomes less visible.

Customers don’t pay less because fintechs are generous,” Jegede says. “They pay less because the system is simpler.”

My friend has not used informal channels since 2020. Those were the “I know a guy” arrangements where someone you trusted would take your Canadian dollars and arrange for naira to reach your family. The rates were often better because these operators worked in parallel markets with less overhead. But the risks were real.

No recourse if something went wrong. No transaction history. No way to trace your money if it vanished.

Most fintech apps are reliable, give better rates, and are generally safe to use,” my friend tells me. “They are also convenient and traceable.”

That convenience matters. Transactions are complete in five minutes. You get confirmations. You can show proof of payment. For most people, the trade-off makes sense. Pay a bit more for peace of mind.

But as Jegede points out, most users have no idea how much more they actually pay.

What $20 billion means

When over $20 billion flows into Nigeria every year, small percentages become huge numbers. If every transaction loses 3-7% in hidden costs, that’s somewhere between $600 million and $1.4 billion that could reach families but stays trapped in the system instead.

The question is not whether to use fintech apps. They are clearly better than the alternatives. The question is whether people understand what they pay.

Faruq still believes there are no hidden fees. Jegede knows there are. The truth sits somewhere in the exchange rate spread that nobody explains clearly.

If you don’t know which currency pair is being applied to your transaction, you don’t know the real cost,” Jegede says. “Even if the fee is zero.”

The next time you send money home, ask your app one question. Which rate are you using for my specific transaction? Not the rate you advertise. The rate you actually apply. The answer might surprise you.

Nigeria received $20.93 billion in remittances in 2024, making it one of Africa’s largest recipients. The average cost of sending $200 to Nigeria was 7.9% in late 2023, more than double the UN’s target of 3%. Most of that cost hides in exchange rate markups rather than visible transfer fees.

The post “No fee” remittances: What really happens when you send money to Nigeria first appeared on Technext.

Market Opportunity
Suilend Logo
Suilend Price(SEND)
$0.09566
$0.09566$0.09566
-0.11%
USD
Suilend (SEND) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Time Traveler to XRP Investor: Once It Starts, There Is No Stopping This Perfect Catalyst

Time Traveler to XRP Investor: Once It Starts, There Is No Stopping This Perfect Catalyst

Time Traveler (@Traveler2236), a well-known crypto commentator and enthusiast, has shared a detailed projection for XRP’s price progression in 2026. His forecast
Share
Timestabloid2026/03/11 21:31
The path to clarity: BIR’s new audit framework

The path to clarity: BIR’s new audit framework

The first quarter of 2026 has been anything but quiet for taxpayers. Along with the preparations for filing income tax returns, the Bureau of Internal Revenue’s
Share
Bworldonline2026/03/11 20:30
PYUSD Token Burn: Unpacking the Astonishing 600 Million Vanish

PYUSD Token Burn: Unpacking the Astonishing 600 Million Vanish

BitcoinWorld PYUSD Token Burn: Unpacking the Astonishing 600 Million Vanish The cryptocurrency world is abuzz with a significant event: a massive PYUSD token burn involving 600 million units of the stablecoin. This astonishing development, first reported by Whale Alert, saw a substantial portion of PYUSD removed from circulation from an unknown wallet. Such an event naturally sparks curiosity and raises questions about its implications for the stablecoin’s stability and future trajectory. What does it mean when such a large sum simply vanishes? What Exactly is a PYUSD Token Burn? Before diving into the specifics of this event, it is crucial to understand what a token burn entails. In simple terms, a token burn is the permanent removal of cryptocurrency tokens from circulation. This is achieved by sending tokens to an unspendable wallet address, often referred to as a “burner” address, where they can never be retrieved or used again. This process effectively reduces the total supply of the cryptocurrency. Why Burn Tokens? Token burns are often executed for several reasons: To reduce supply and potentially increase scarcity, which could lead to an increase in value if demand remains constant. To stabilize a cryptocurrency’s price, particularly for stablecoins. As part of a deflationary mechanism or to implement specific tokenomics strategies. To signal commitment to the project’s long-term health and value. The 600 Million PYUSD Token Burn: What Happened? Whale Alert, a well-known blockchain tracker, recently flagged a colossal transaction: 600 million PYUSD being transferred to an unknown wallet, which was subsequently identified as a burn address. The details surrounding the origin and specific intent behind this particular burn remain somewhat mysterious. However, the outcome is clear: these 600 million PYUSD tokens are now permanently out of circulation. This scale of a PYUSD token burn is not an everyday occurrence. It represents a substantial reduction in the overall supply of the stablecoin. While the exact reasoning from the entity initiating the burn is not public, such large-scale actions are typically strategic, aimed at influencing market dynamics or fulfilling predefined tokenomic policies. Why Does This PYUSD Token Burn Matter for the Stablecoin? A burn of this magnitude carries significant weight, especially for a stablecoin like PYUSD. Stablecoins are designed to maintain a stable value, often pegged to a fiat currency like the US dollar. Reducing the supply can have several implications: Scarcity and Value: By decreasing the total available supply, the burn could theoretically enhance the scarcity of PYUSD. For a stablecoin, this often means reinforcing its peg rather than driving up its price above the peg. Peg Stability: A controlled burn can be a mechanism to help maintain the stablecoin’s peg to its underlying asset. If the stablecoin’s market price deviates below its peg, reducing supply can help bring it back into line. Market Confidence: Large, well-communicated burns can sometimes boost investor confidence, signaling that the issuers are actively managing the token’s supply to ensure its stability and health. However, an ‘unknown wallet’ aspect adds a layer of intrigue. What Are the Potential Impacts of Such a Large PYUSD Token Burn? The immediate impact of the 600 million PYUSD token burn is a reduction in the total circulating supply. This action, while seemingly straightforward, can ripple through the broader cryptocurrency ecosystem. For PYUSD holders and potential investors, understanding these potential impacts is key. One primary effect is on the supply-demand equilibrium. With fewer tokens available, if demand for PYUSD remains consistent or grows, the stablecoin’s peg could be strengthened. Moreover, such a substantial burn might also be part of a larger strategy to comply with regulatory requirements or to adjust the stablecoin’s backing reserves. It is important to consider the transparency surrounding such events. While the act of burning is verifiable on the blockchain, the ‘unknown wallet’ aspect of this particular burn leaves room for speculation about its origins and ultimate goals. Transparency in such large-scale operations often builds greater trust within the community. In conclusion, the recent 600 million PYUSD token burn is a remarkable event that underscores the dynamic nature of the stablecoin market. While the exact motivations behind this specific burn from an unknown wallet remain to be fully clarified, its immediate effect is a significant reduction in PYUSD’s circulating supply. This move has the potential to influence the stablecoin’s scarcity, strengthen its peg, and shape market perceptions, ultimately contributing to the ongoing evolution of the digital asset landscape. Frequently Asked Questions About the PYUSD Token Burn Here are some common questions regarding token burns and the recent PYUSD event: Q1: What is a cryptocurrency token burn? A1: A token burn is the process of permanently removing cryptocurrency tokens from circulation by sending them to an unspendable wallet address. This reduces the total supply of the token. Q2: Why do projects conduct token burns? A2: Projects burn tokens for various reasons, including reducing supply to potentially increase scarcity, maintaining a stable price (especially for stablecoins), implementing deflationary tokenomics, or signaling commitment to the project’s long-term health. Q3: How does a PYUSD token burn affect its value? A3: For a stablecoin like PYUSD, a token burn is typically used to help maintain its peg to the US dollar by adjusting supply. While it reduces scarcity, its primary goal is usually to reinforce stability rather than to increase its price above the peg. Q4: Is the 600 million PYUSD burn a positive or negative event? A4: Generally, a controlled token burn is considered a positive mechanism for managing supply and potentially strengthening a stablecoin’s peg. The specific details, like the ‘unknown wallet’ in this case, might raise questions about transparency, but the act of burning itself is a common strategy. Q5: How can I verify a token burn? A5: Token burns are recorded on the blockchain. You can typically verify a burn by looking up the transaction on a blockchain explorer, where you will see tokens sent to a known burn address (an address with no private key, making the funds irretrievable). The world of stablecoins is constantly evolving, and events like this PYUSD token burn are crucial to understanding its dynamics. If you found this article insightful, please consider sharing it with your network on social media. Your shares help us bring important crypto news and analysis to a wider audience! To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping stablecoin market stability. This post PYUSD Token Burn: Unpacking the Astonishing 600 Million Vanish first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 01:40