BATANGAS Rep. Leandro Antonio L. Leviste on Wednesday rejected blame over the multibillion-peso fine imposed by the Energy department on numerous delayed energyBATANGAS Rep. Leandro Antonio L. Leviste on Wednesday rejected blame over the multibillion-peso fine imposed by the Energy department on numerous delayed energy

Leviste says he did not receive DoE’s P24-B fine notice

BATANGAS Rep. Leandro Antonio L. Leviste on Wednesday rejected blame over the multibillion-peso fine imposed by the Energy department on numerous delayed energy projects, saying the notice was not sent to a company he owned.

Mr. Leviste said the Energy department’s P24-billion fine for delayed projects was sent to SP New Energy Corp. (SPNEC) and not Solar Philippines Power Project Holdings, Inc., but stopped short of saying that SPNEC should shoulder it.

“It was not Solar Philippines Power Project Holdings that received the letter about the said fine, but SP New Energy Corp.,” he said in a media briefing in Filipino. “I can categorically say that none of my companies received a letter stating there was a P24-billion penalty, and that it was SPNEC which received the letter.”

An SPNEC representative, reached for comment, reiterated the company is not liable for the Department of Energy’s (DoE) multibillion-peso penalty.

The dispute over liability arose after Energy Secretary Sharon S. Garin last week said Solar Philippines would be fined for delays in delivering nearly 12,000 megawatts (MW) of renewable energy. The DoE terminated 33 of its service contracts, accounting for around 64% of more than 18,000 MW of potential capacity.

Mr. Leviste said he had paid other fines imposed by the DoE. “We already paid other penalties… just recently… about P70 million.” — Kenneth Christiane L. Basilio

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.0005399
$0.0005399$0.0005399
-2.93%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
QNT Technical Analysis Jan 21

QNT Technical Analysis Jan 21

The post QNT Technical Analysis Jan 21 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. QNT’s MACD histogram showing a positive trend and RSI stabilizing in the neutral zone
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/21 23:54
SHIB Alert: First Three-Hour Death Cross Flashes on Chart in 2026, Is It Important?

SHIB Alert: First Three-Hour Death Cross Flashes on Chart in 2026, Is It Important?

The post SHIB Alert: First Three-Hour Death Cross Flashes on Chart in 2026, Is It Important? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Shiba Inu is forming a death cross
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/22 00:26