PANews reported on January 19th that Garrett Jin, suspected to be the "1011 insider whale," posted on the X platform, stating that comparing the current Bitcoin market to 2022 is extremely unprofessional. He believes that there are fundamental differences between the two in terms of long-term price structure, macroeconomic background, investor composition, and distribution of tokens.
- He pointed out that the current macroeconomic environment is the complete opposite of the high-inflation and interest rate hike cycle of 2022: the situation in Ukraine is easing, CPI and risk-free interest rates are declining, and in particular, the AI technological revolution is likely to drive the economy into a long-term deflationary cycle. Interest rates have entered a phase of rate cuts, and central bank liquidity is returning to the financial system, which defines the risk-averse behavior of capital. Since 2020, Bitcoin and the year-on-year change in CPI have shown a clear negative correlation, and under the AI-driven technological revolution, long-term deflation is a high-probability outcome.
- From a technical perspective, 2021-2022 formed a weekly M-top pattern, while 2025 represents a breakout from the upward channel, which, statistically, is more likely a "bear trap" before a rebound. He pointed out that for a bear market like the one in 2022 to repeat itself, stringent conditions must be met simultaneously, including a resurgence of inflationary shocks, the central bank restarting interest rate hikes or quantitative tightening, and a decisive drop in prices below $80,850. It is premature to be bearish before these conditions are met.
- In terms of investor structure, the period from 2020 to 2022 was a highly leveraged speculative market dominated by retail investors. However, since the launch of Bitcoin ETFs in 2023, structural long-term holders have entered the market, effectively locking up supply and significantly reducing trading speed and volatility. Bitcoin has shifted from a historical volatility of 80-150% to a range of 30-60%, becoming a distinctly different asset. The current market has entered a more mature institutional era, characterized by stable underlying demand, locked supply, and institutional-level volatility.
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.