Federal safety officials have given Tesla an extra five weeks to respond to questions about its cars breaking traffic rules while using the company’s automated Federal safety officials have given Tesla an extra five weeks to respond to questions about its cars breaking traffic rules while using the company’s automated

Tesla gets five-week extension in U.S. probe into Full Self-Driving traffic violations

Federal safety officials have given Tesla an extra five weeks to respond to questions about its cars breaking traffic rules while using the company’s automated driving system.

The electric carmaker asked for the delay earlier this week from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The agency launched its look into what Tesla calls Full Self-Driving, or FSD, back in October.

At the time, regulators pointed to dozens of cases where Tesla vehicles ran red lights, traveled the wrong way down roads, or made other dangerous mistakes.

Last month, NHTSA sent Tesla a list of questions. The agency wanted to know how many customer complaints, damage claims, legal disputes, and lawsuits might be tied to these problems. On Jan. 12, Tesla told regulators it needed extra time to sort through reports about traffic violations that could be connected to the investigation.

Over 8,000 records still need manual review

“As of today, there are 8,313 records remaining that require manual review,” the company wrote in paperwork posted on the agency’s website. Tesla said its team could get through about 300 records each day. The new deadline is Feb. 23.

The success of FSD matters more than ever for the company. CEO Elon Musk is betting on the technology to boost sales after two straight years of falling vehicle deliveries. Musk often talks up how well Tesla’s driving features work. But California officials have pushed back, saying the company makes its cars sound more capable than they really are. The state has warned it could ban Tesla sales for 30 days, with that punishment possibly kicking in early this year.

Beyond the traffic violation investigation, NHTSA is also looking at whether Tesla vehicles can properly spot and react to bright sunlight, fog, and other conditions that make it hard to see. That separate probe started in October 2024 after several crashes, including one that killed someone.

In its request for more time, Tesla said it was swamped with questions from regulators.

Dealing with three big information requests at nearly the same time “is unduly burdensome and affects the quality of responses, the company said in its extension filing, as seen by Bloomberg.

Tesla plans to ask for yet another extension

Tesla also signaled it will ask for yet another extension down the road. Once it finishes counting up traffic violation reports and explaining what it thinks caused these problems, the company plans to request more time to dig deeper into each complaint.

That would include details like which version of the FSD software was running, whether drivers got warnings before violations happened, and whether any crashes, injuries, or deaths were reported.

NHTSA has asked for timelines showing what happened in each incident, starting 30 seconds before the first traffic violation and ending when a driver took back control, a final violation occurred, or a crash happened.

Meanwhile, a member of Congress wants new rules for car doors. Representative Robin Kelly, a Democrat from Illinois, has put forward a bill that would make carmakers include manual door releases in new vehicles. The measure targets the electric door systems that Tesla helped make popular.

Under the proposed law, cars with electric doors would need a clearly marked mechanical latch that is “intuitive to use and readily accessible for the occupant.” Vehicles would also need ways for emergency crews to get inside when the power goes out.

Kelly introduced the bill last week. It marks the first time Capitol Hill has moved to address worries about electric car doors. Several people have been badly hurt or killed after getting trapped inside vehicles when powered doors failed to open.

Sharpen your strategy with mentorship + daily ideas - 30 days free access to our trading program

Market Opportunity
Union Logo
Union Price(U)
$0.002794
$0.002794$0.002794
+0.68%
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip

Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip

The post Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gold is strutting its way into record territory, smashing through $3,700 an ounce Wednesday morning, as Sprott Asset Management strategist Paul Wong says the yellow metal may finally snatch the dollar’s most coveted role: store of value. Wong Warns: Fiscal Dominance Puts U.S. Dollar on Notice, Gold on Top Gold prices eased slightly to $3,678.9 […] Source: https://news.bitcoin.com/gold-hits-3700-as-sprotts-wong-says-dollars-store-of-value-crown-may-slip/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:33
DeFi Leaders Raise Alarm Over Market Structure Bill’s Shaky Future

DeFi Leaders Raise Alarm Over Market Structure Bill’s Shaky Future

US Senate Postpones Markup of Digital Asset Market Clarity Act Amid Industry Concerns The proposed Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY) in the U.S. Senate
Share
Crypto Breaking News2026/01/17 06:20