TLDR: Coinbase withdrew support for the 278-page crypto bill citing concerns over tokenized equities bans and DeFi restrictions. Major firms including Kraken, CircleTLDR: Coinbase withdrew support for the 278-page crypto bill citing concerns over tokenized equities bans and DeFi restrictions. Major firms including Kraken, Circle

Senate Banking Committee Postpones Crypto Bill Markup After Coinbase Withdraws Support

TLDR:

  • Coinbase withdrew support for the 278-page crypto bill citing concerns over tokenized equities bans and DeFi restrictions.
  • Major firms including Kraken, Circle, and Ripple, reaffirmed their commitment to the legislative process despite challenges.
  • The bill’s amendments allegedly favor traditional banks through stablecoin yield restrictions and tokenization provisions.
  • Chairman Tim Scott postponed the markup but confirmed all parties remain engaged in good faith negotiations.

Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott announced Wednesday evening the postponement of a crucial markup session for comprehensive crypto market structure legislation. 

The decision came after Coinbase withdrew its support for the bill, citing significant concerns about provisions that would disadvantage the crypto industry. 

The 278-page legislation had been scheduled for markup on Thursday, representing months of bipartisan negotiations aimed at establishing regulatory clarity for digital assets.

Industry Backlash Triggers Withdrawal of Support

The crypto industry expressed mounting frustrations on Wednesday afternoon over proposed amendments to the market structure bill. 

Companies argued that lawmakers were making excessive concessions to traditional banks and financial institutions. 

Specific concerns centered on stablecoin yield restrictions and tokenization provisions that critics claimed favored legacy finance.

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong delivered a decisive blow around 4:00 p.m. when he announced the company’s withdrawal of support. 

In a post on X, Armstrong detailed multiple problematic elements affecting the legislation. His concerns included what he characterized as a de facto ban on tokenized equities and DeFi prohibitions that would grant the government unlimited access to financial records.

Armstrong further objected to provisions that would erode the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s authority. 

The proposed changes would make the CFTC subservient to the Securities and Exchange Commission, he argued. 

Draft amendments targeting rewards on stablecoins drew particular criticism for allegedly allowing banks to eliminate competition.

“We appreciate all the hard work by members of the Senate to reach a bipartisan outcome, but this version would be materially worse than the current status quo,” Armstrong wrote. “We’d rather have no bill than a bad bill.” 

Despite the withdrawal, he expressed continued optimism about reaching better outcomes through ongoing engagement.

Path Forward Remains Uncertain Despite Continued Support

Several major industry players quickly moved to counter Coinbase’s withdrawal by reaffirming their commitment to the legislative process. 

Companies, including a16z, Circle, Paradigm, Kraken, and Ripple, issued separate statements supporting the markup. 

Trade associations such as Coin Center and the Digital Chamber also backed moving forward with negotiations.

Kraken co-CEO Arjun Sethi emphasized the importance of persistence through difficult negotiations. “It is easy to walk away when a process gets difficult. What is hard and what actually matters is continuing to show up, working through disagreements, and building consensus in a system designed to require it,” Sethi said on X. 

The statements collectively aimed to prevent other undecided senators from viewing Coinbase’s exit as grounds for opposition.

Chairman Scott addressed the postponement in a statement announcing the delay. “I’ve spoken with leaders across the crypto industry, the financial sector, and my Democratic and Republican colleagues, and everyone remains at the table working in good faith,” Scott stated. However, he provided no specific timeline for rescheduling the markup session.

The Senate will be out of session next week for Martin Luther King Jr. Day. The Senate Agriculture Committee had also postponed its own markup originally scheduled for Thursday. 

Whether the Banking Committee’s delay affects the Agriculture Committee’s timeline remains unclear. The core issues that sparked Wednesday’s conflict will likely dominate future negotiations as stakeholders work toward a consensus.

The post Senate Banking Committee Postpones Crypto Bill Markup After Coinbase Withdraws Support appeared first on Blockonomi.

Market Opportunity
Major Logo
Major Price(MAJOR)
$0.12631
$0.12631$0.12631
-2.21%
USD
Major (MAJOR) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

X to cut off InfoFi crypto projects from accessing its API

X to cut off InfoFi crypto projects from accessing its API

X, the most widely used app for crypto projects, is changing its API access policy. InfoFi projects, which proliferated non-organic bot content, will be cut off
Share
Cryptopolitan2026/01/16 02:50
X Just Killed Kaito and InfoFi Crypto, Several Tokens Crash

X Just Killed Kaito and InfoFi Crypto, Several Tokens Crash

The post X Just Killed Kaito and InfoFi Crypto, Several Tokens Crash appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. X has revoked API access for apps that reward users for
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/16 03:42
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00