The post ‘Department Of War’ Name Change Could Cost Up To $125 Million, CBO Says appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline The Trump administration’s renamingThe post ‘Department Of War’ Name Change Could Cost Up To $125 Million, CBO Says appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline The Trump administration’s renaming

‘Department Of War’ Name Change Could Cost Up To $125 Million, CBO Says

Topline

The Trump administration’s renaming of the Department of Defense to the “Department of War” could cost as much as $125 million, the Congressional Budget Office said in a Wednesday report, providing an estimate of the cost months after President Donald Trump said the change “just sounded to me better.”

The CBO report was published Wednesday.

Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Key Facts

The report said a name change would cost about $10 million for a “modest implementation” that primarily occurred within the Office of the Secretary of Defense and did not include a broad effort to overhaul the name across all military assets.

The costs would “probably be paid from existing budgets,” the report said, noting the CBO’s estimate is uncertain because the Department of Defense has yet to decide how it plans to implement the renaming executive order Trump signed last year.

The name change could cost a few million dollars if a “minimal implementation” is made, the CBO added, though the total could reach as high as $125 million in the case of a broad and rapid name change.

Examples of costs include staff time spent updating document templates, website revisions, letterhead changes, new signage and ceremonial items, according to the CBO, with costs depending on how aggressive the Department of Defense implemented its secondary title and “how it prioritized renaming activities over other ongoing missions.”

Forbes has reached out to the Department of Defense for comment.

Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts: We’re launching text message alerts so you’ll always know the biggest stories shaping the day’s headlines. Text “Alerts” to (201) 335-0739 or sign up here.

Crucial Quote

“A statutory renaming could cost hundreds of millions of dollars depending on how Congress and DoD chose to implement the change,” the report said.

Key Background

The Department of Defense is the legal name of the “Department of War,” which can only become the agency’s official name through legislation, since Trump lacks the power to change the name on his own. The Department of Defense has yet to send to Trump the legislative and executive actions needed to make the change official, according to the CBO. Trump said last year the name change was “much more appropriate” and “just sounded to me better.” The Trump administration has made a habit of renaming military assets and bases. Prior to his role as secretary of defense, Pete Hegseth blasted Biden-era name changes away from Confederate figures. Hegseth announced name changes to multiple military bases last year, naming them after World War I and World War II soldiers with the same names as Confederate leaders to circumvent a law banning Confederate naming of U.S. military assets. Hegseth also ordered gay rights activist Harvey Milk’s name to be stricken from a Navy ship. Milk was a Navy veteran and one of the first openly gay elected officials in the U.S.

Further Reading

Hegseth Orders Name Of Gay Rights Icon Harvey Milk Stricken From Navy Ship (Forbes)

Hegseth Renames Fort Moore Back To Fort Benning—Latest Rollback Of Military Base Name Changes (Forbes)

Defense Secretary Hegseth Renames Fort Liberty To Fort Bragg—But Not After The Confederate General (Forbes)

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoniopequenoiv/2026/01/14/department-of-defenses-name-change-to-department-of-war-could-cost-up-to-125-million/

Market Opportunity
ChangeX Logo
ChangeX Price(CHANGE)
$0.00138059
$0.00138059$0.00138059
0.00%
USD
ChangeX (CHANGE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Moldova to regulate cryptocurrency ownership and trading in 2026

Moldova to regulate cryptocurrency ownership and trading in 2026

The Eastern European nation of Moldova will regulate cryptocurrency ownership and transactions as part of a comprehensive framework to be adopted this year. Admittedly
Share
Cryptopolitan2026/01/16 00:25
JuanHand: Double-digit loan growth likely ’til 2030

JuanHand: Double-digit loan growth likely ’til 2030

JUANHAND Lending Corp. expects the Philippine financial technology (fintech) industry to sustain high-double-digit loan growth through 2030, after a resilient performance
Share
Bworldonline2026/01/16 00:04
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41