The post Tesla agrees to settlement talks over racial harassment claims at California plant appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Tesla has agreed to enter settlementThe post Tesla agrees to settlement talks over racial harassment claims at California plant appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Tesla has agreed to enter settlement

Tesla agrees to settlement talks over racial harassment claims at California plant

Tesla has agreed to enter settlement negotiations with a federal agency that sued the electric car maker over allegations of racial harassment at its California factory.

Court documents filed Tuesday show Tesla will participate in private mediation with the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The two parties expect to choose a mediator soon, with talks scheduled for March or April.

Should mediation fail to produce an agreement, lawyers said they’ll submit a proposal to the court by June 17, 2026, outlining how to proceed with the lawsuit.

The federal agency filed suit against Tesla in 2023, claiming Black workers at the Fremont factory experienced ongoing racial harassment. The complaint also alleges company leaders retaliated against employees who raised concerns about the treatment.

This isn’t the first attempt at resolution

Tesla and the commission already went through mandatory mediation back in June 2023, but those talks didn’t work out. Neither Tesla nor the employment commission provided comment when contacted.

The case number is US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Tesla, 3:23-cv-04984, filed in federal court in Northern California.

When the commission first brought the lawsuit, it accused the Austin-based automaker of creating a hostile environment for racial minorities at the California plant. Black workers faced severe and persistent racial harassment, according to the complaint. Company officials then punished workers who complained about what was happening.

Tesla disclosed it was under federal investigation in an April 2022 filing with regulators. That probe came before California’s civil rights agency filed its own separate lawsuit accusing Tesla of turning a blind eye to rampant racism against Black workers at Fremont and other facilities statewide.

Allegations Going Back to 2015

According to the federal suit, problems at the Fremont plant go back to at least 2015. Non-Black workers regularly used racial slurs and made monkey noises, the commission claimed. Managers sometimes addressed Black employees—both individually and as a group—using the N-word. Workers encountered racist graffiti around the workplace, including nooses and swastikas drawn on desks, in elevators, and even on vehicles moving down the production line.

The commission wants the court to prohibit Tesla from subjecting Black workers to racism and retaliation or maintaining a hostile workplace. It’s seeking financial compensation for workers’ emotional distress and lost wages, either through back pay or reinstatement.

The federal case was filed in Oakland, California.

California’s civil rights agency has made similar claims, saying Tesla ignored years of employee complaints about racial slurs at the plant where the company builds its Model S, X, 3, and Y cars. Tesla’s defense in court argues the state overstepped its authority and “uses litigation as a bullying tactic and to advance its turf war” with the federal commission. That state case, filed last year, remains pending.

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/tesla-agrees-to-settlement/

Market Opportunity
Talus Logo
Talus Price(US)
$0.00707
$0.00707$0.00707
-3.28%
USD
Talus (US) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
QNT Technical Analysis Jan 21

QNT Technical Analysis Jan 21

The post QNT Technical Analysis Jan 21 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. QNT’s MACD histogram showing a positive trend and RSI stabilizing in the neutral zone
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/21 23:54
SHIB Alert: First Three-Hour Death Cross Flashes on Chart in 2026, Is It Important?

SHIB Alert: First Three-Hour Death Cross Flashes on Chart in 2026, Is It Important?

The post SHIB Alert: First Three-Hour Death Cross Flashes on Chart in 2026, Is It Important? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Shiba Inu is forming a death cross
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/22 00:26