Microsoft says China is beating U.S. AI firms in Africa, Russia, and Belarus by using cheap open models and government subsidies.Microsoft says China is beating U.S. AI firms in Africa, Russia, and Belarus by using cheap open models and government subsidies.

Microsoft warns China is beating the U.S. in AI influence across Africa, Russia and Belarus

Microsoft is calling it like it sees it; China is winning the AI race far from Silicon Valley, and it’s doing it with cheap tech and state money, taking control of regions Africa, Russia, Belarus, and many more.

While American firms are still pushing for paid subscriptions and locked ecosystems, Chinese AI tools are spreading fast thanks to open-source models and heavy subsidies.

Brad Smith, president of Microsoft, said DeepSeek’s rapid growth shows how global the fight for AI dominance has become.

“We have to recognize that right now, unlike a year ago, China has an open-source model, and increasingly more than one, that is competitive,” he said. “They benefit from subsidization by the Chinese government. They benefit from subsidies that enable [them] to basically undercut American companies based on price.”

DeepSeek expands into African and sanctioned markets

New data from Microsoft shows DeepSeek’s AI model R1 has taken over in markets where American tech firms have limited reach. The company holds 56% of the AI market in Belarus, 49% in Cuba, and 43% in Russia.

In Africa, it’s the same story. DeepSeek has already captured 18% in Ethiopia and 17% in Zimbabwe, fueled by low costs and no strings attached.

The R1 model launched a year ago and gained traction quickly. According to Microsoft, it helped speed up AI use across the global south by being affordable and easy to access.

That growth has pushed China ahead of the U.S. in global usage of open AI systems, which developers can use, edit, or build on freely. That’s a major difference from how OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic run their tools; those are locked, paid, and built for control.

Smith said poorer countries need help if they’re going to stand a chance.

“If we rely on private capital flows alone, I don’t think that will be sufficient to compete with a competitor that is subsidised to the degree that Chinese companies often are,” said Smith. He called for international development banks and lending institutions to step in and fund data centers and energy costs.

Bright Simons, an AI analyst from Ghana’s IMANI think-tank, said it’s hard to measure DeepSeek’s full impact, but confirmed that Chinese models are now the go-to for many users.

“Africans can’t afford very expensive solutions apart from open source, so you have to go to [Meta’s] Llama or Chinese options,” he said. He also mentioned local tools like Masakhane, built across Africa, and InkubaLM from South Africa.

Microsoft says U.S. tech risks losing AI war without help

The bigger issue, according to Microsoft, is how AI adoption is spreading, and where it’s not. In late 2025, 24% of people in the global north were using AI. That number was just 14% in the global south, with a worldwide average of 16%.

Smith called this a “cause for concern,” warning that if the U.S. doesn’t invest, this divide will grow and so will inequality.

He said the AI divide is now part of the larger battle between the U.S. and China. Microsoft believes the U.S. needs both private investment in training and infrastructure, and public support from governments and banks. “What we do have is, as American companies, a stronger reputation for trust. We have access to better chips than the Chinese companies do… [but] you always have to compete on price,” Smith said.

DeepSeek made waves in Silicon Valley by releasing a strong AI reasoning model that worked well despite needing less compute power. Its next big model is expected to land just before the Lunar New Year.

But Smith also warned that if U.S. tech companies ignore Africa, they’re ignoring the future. “If American tech companies or western governments were to close their eyes to the future in Africa, they would be closing their eyes to the future of the world more broadly, and I think that would be a grave mistake,” he said.

If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Market Opportunity
Union Logo
Union Price(U)
$0.002777
$0.002777$0.002777
-5.12%
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Daily market key data review and trend analysis, produced by PANews.
Share
PANews2025/04/30 13:50
CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon

CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon

The post CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal highlighted Polygon’s lead in global bonds, Spiko US T-Bill, and Spiko Euro T-Bill. Polygon published an X post to share that its roadmap to GigaGas was still scaling. Sentiments around POL price were last seen to be bearish. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal shared key pointers from the Dune and RWA.xyz report. These pertain to highlights about RWA on Polygon. Simultaneously, Polygon underlined its roadmap towards GigaGas. Sentiments around POL price were last seen fumbling under bearish emotions. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal on Polygon RWA CEO Sandeep Nailwal highlighted three key points from the Dune and RWA.xyz report. The Chief Executive of Polygon maintained that Polygon PoS was hosting RWA TVL worth $1.13 billion across 269 assets plus 2,900 holders. Nailwal confirmed from the report that RWA was happening on Polygon. The Dune and https://t.co/W6WSFlHoQF report on RWA is out and it shows that RWA is happening on Polygon. Here are a few highlights: – Leading in Global Bonds: Polygon holds 62% share of tokenized global bonds (driven by Spiko’s euro MMF and Cashlink euro issues) – Spiko U.S.… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) September 17, 2025 The X post published by Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal underlined that the ecosystem was leading in global bonds by holding a 62% share of tokenized global bonds. He further highlighted that Polygon was leading with Spiko US T-Bill at approximately 29% share of TVL along with Ethereum, adding that the ecosystem had more than 50% share in the number of holders. Finally, Sandeep highlighted from the report that there was a strong adoption for Spiko Euro T-Bill with 38% share of TVL. He added that 68% of returns were on Polygon across all the chains. Polygon Roadmap to GigaGas In a different update from Polygon, the community…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:10