The post CZ-Backed YZi Labs Clashes with CEA Industries Over Poison Pill appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Changpeng “CZ” Zhao-backed YZi Labs has escalated The post CZ-Backed YZi Labs Clashes with CEA Industries Over Poison Pill appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Changpeng “CZ” Zhao-backed YZi Labs has escalated

CZ-Backed YZi Labs Clashes with CEA Industries Over Poison Pill

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Changpeng “CZ” Zhao-backed YZi Labs has escalated its campaign against CEA Industries over a newly adopted poison pill (a defensive tactic a company’s board uses to make a hostile takeover extremely difficult or expensive), and bylaw amendments that it claims are “stockholder-unfriendly” and intended to entrench the current board. 

The investment firm, backed by Binance founder CZ, outlined its objections in a Monday filing with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and in a parallel public X statement on Wednesday.

​YZi said it is reviewing CEA’s adoption of a shareholder rights plan and bylaw changes that affect shareholders’ ability to act by written consent. 

YZi argued that the measures impose “unnecessary constraints and procedural burdens” beyond Nevada law and warned that further “degradation of voting rights” could expose the board to potential liability for failing to meet its fiduciary duties. 

The company is pursuing a consent solicitation to expand the size of CEA’s board and elect a new slate of directors.

YZi Labs slams CEA’s poison pill. Source: YZi Labs

​YZi also rejected CEA’s Dec. 4 statement that it “has never considered an alternative token” for its digital asset treasury (DAT) strategy or launched competitive DAT ventures.

Related: CZ’s YZi Labs moves to take over board of flatlining BNB treasury

It pointed to public comments CEA CEO David Namdar allegedly made at a November 2025 industry conference about contemplating other crypto assets, such as Solana (SOL), as evidence that alternatives to BNB (BNB) had been discussed. 

YZi said this, combined with promotion and capital-raising activities for other DAT projects by Namdar and director Hans Thomas, raised concerns among shareholders about alignment with CEA’s BNB-focused strategy.

YZi’s claims and CEA’s defense

CEA had addressed the activist pressure in its aforementioned statement, saying that it reaffirmed its commitment to its BNB DAT strategy and that it had not launched, nor had plans to launch, a competing DAT.

In the same release, the company said it had adopted a shareholder rights plan and amended bylaws, framing those steps as intended to protect the interests of all shareholders and preserve long-term value while welcoming shareholder engagement.

Related: Behind the scenes of public companies that are rushing to create crypto treasuries

YZi has criticized the fact that CEA had not held its 2025 annual meeting by its usual December anniversary date and has urged the board not to engage in “manipulative behavior” around scheduling, saying the meeting will be a “critical venue” for shareholder to vote on the board’s composition.

CEA has not issued any additional public statement directly responding to YZi’s claims on Monday about entrenchment, the annual meeting timing or alleged consideration of alternative tokens.

In a statement shared with Cointelegraph, a YZi spokesperson confirmed that its top priorities are to protect CEA Industries (BNC) shareholder rights and to “promote the integrity and the value of the BNB ecosystem” in a manner that is compliant with the SEC requirements on filings and disclosures.

”We appreciate Cointelegraph and the community’s continued attention to our public announcements and SEC filings,” the spokesperson said.

Cointelegraph reached out to CEA Industries for comment but had not received a response by publication time.

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/yzi-labs-escalates-fight-over-cea?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound

Market Opportunity
PUBLIC Logo
PUBLIC Price(PUBLIC)
$0.01556
$0.01556$0.01556
-0.89%
USD
PUBLIC (PUBLIC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
The Virtual Hospital: How IT Infrastructure is Powering the Next Wave of Remote Patient Monitoring

The Virtual Hospital: How IT Infrastructure is Powering the Next Wave of Remote Patient Monitoring

Introduction to the Virtual Hospital Revolution The healthcare industry is undergoing a transformative shift as virtual hospitals emerge at the forefront of patient
Share
Techbullion2026/03/20 14:45
People have their uses: Agentic Wallet and the next decade of wallets

People have their uses: Agentic Wallet and the next decade of wallets

Written by: Lacie Zhang, Bitget Wallet Researcher In 1984, Apple (Macintosh) killed the command line with a mouse. In 2026, Agent is killing the mouse. This is
Share
PANews2026/03/20 14:13