TLDR China will pay interest on its stablecoin, boosting appeal for users. Brian Armstrong says rewards help users and won’t harm bank lending. U.S. banks earn $TLDR China will pay interest on its stablecoin, boosting appeal for users. Brian Armstrong says rewards help users and won’t harm bank lending. U.S. banks earn $

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong Calls China’s Stablecoin Move a Wake-Up Call

TLDR

  • China will pay interest on its stablecoin, boosting appeal for users.
  • Brian Armstrong says rewards help users and won’t harm bank lending.

  • U.S. banks earn $360B annually from deposits and card fees.

  • Cornell and CRA studies show no link between stablecoin growth and bank deposits.


Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has voiced concern about U.S. regulatory resistance to stablecoin rewards, warning that banning them could weaken the country’s global competitiveness. His comments followed China’s announcement that it would offer interest to users of its central bank digital currency, the Digital Yuan.

Armstrong argued that stablecoin rewards do not reduce lending but can benefit everyday users. He said, “Rewards on stablecoins will not change lending one bit—but it does have a big impact on whether U.S. stablecoins are competitive.”

His remarks come as the U.S. Senate Banking Committee prepares to review the Market Structure bill, which may include restrictions on stablecoin rewards.

China’s Interest Model Sparks Concerns Over U.S. Competitive Edge

According to Brian Armstrong, China’s move to pay interest on its state-backed digital currency is a strategic decision aimed at empowering citizens and gaining an advantage in the growing digital payments economy.

Faryar Shirzad, Chief Policy Officer at Coinbase, echoed this concern, warning that the U.S. risks falling behind.

As Coincentral outlined, stablecoins are increasingly viewed as a tool for real-world payments and programmable finance, especially with global competition rising.

Industry Pushback on Claims That Rewards Harm Bank Deposits

Bcking Brian Armstrong, Shirzad argued that the real concern among large banks is not financial stability but competition. He said banks oppose rewards because they threaten high-margin businesses, such as deposits and card fees. He pointed out that U.S. banks earn more than $360 billion per year from those services.

Shirzad cited recent research from Charles River Associates and Cornell University, both of which found no evidence that stablecoin rewards reduce community bank deposits or lending capacity. CRA’s data, as CNF reported, showed no link between USDC adoption and deposit outflows from smaller banks.

The Cornell study concluded that stablecoin rewards would need to approach 6% to meaningfully affect deposit levels. No such offers currently exist in the market.

Policymakers Urged to Uphold GENIUS Framework for Stablecoin Rewards

Shirzad also referred to the GENIUS legislation previously passed by Congress, which had resolved the issue of rewards by allowing them within certain guidelines. Reopening the debate now, he said, could lead to confusion and harm U.S. innovation.

As CoinCentral detailed, stablecoin reward programs are often framed as consumer benefits and are being tested globally, with growing demand for programmable finance. Armstrong and Shirzad both called for regulatory clarity that allows fair competition while safeguarding innovation.

The post Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong Calls China’s Stablecoin Move a Wake-Up Call appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
Movement Logo
Movement Price(MOVE)
$0.03506
$0.03506$0.03506
-0.36%
USD
Movement (MOVE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
XRP Holds $1.88 Fibonacci Support as 3-Day Chart Signals Bullish Continuation

XRP Holds $1.88 Fibonacci Support as 3-Day Chart Signals Bullish Continuation

XRP is once again drawing attention on higher timeframes as its 3-day chart begins to mirror past bullish phases. Market observers are closely watching how the
Share
Tronweekly2026/01/11 21:30
Russians ask government hotlines whether pensions are paid in crypto

Russians ask government hotlines whether pensions are paid in crypto

                                                                               Crypto-related questions about pension payments are reaching Russia’s Social 
Share
Coinstats2026/01/11 20:13