The Senate Banking Committee demonstrated a commitment to actively participating in discussions regarding the CLARITY Act.The Senate Banking Committee demonstrated a commitment to actively participating in discussions regarding the CLARITY Act.

Senate Banking Committee faces critical January push on CLARITY Act crypto bill

The Senate Banking Committee demonstrated a commitment to actively participating in discussions regarding the CLARITY Act. This move is being adopted at a time when lawmakers are pushing forward with legislation that has been halted in the crypto sector.

Therefore, as of January, the Senate Banking Committee is facing heightened pressure to determine whether the bill can be advanced with bipartisan backing. To illustrate the intense nature of the matter, reports from reliable sources noted that the Senate has a short timeframe to address this situation.

Uncertainties surrounding the fate of the CLARITY Act ignite heated debates 

Punchbowl News reported that the Senate scheduled a bipartisan meeting for Tuesday, January 6. Notably, this meeting will take place at a time when the Senate Banking Committee is holding crucial discussions regarding crypto market structure bills.

To effectively carry out this discussion, the Senate opted for January as an important month to tackle this heated debate and draw conclusions before they break for Martin Luther King Jr Day, a federal holiday in the United States.

Meanwhile, it is worth noting that Senate Banking Committee members have yet to reach a bipartisan agreement on a markup for last year. Nonetheless, recent reports from reliable sources indicate that substantial efforts to support the CLARITY Act, which aims to establish a clear regulatory framework for crypto markets, have led to significant leadership challenges within the committee.

Regarding these challenges, reports confirm that negotiations have been ongoing for several months. The goal of this negotiation was to unite Republicans and Democrats to devise a solution for effectively regulating cryptocurrencies within the financial system, particularly in the United States.

While the debate continued in the ecosystem, Brendan Pedersen, currently serving as a Financial services reporter at Punchbowl News, decided to weigh in on the topic of discussion. Pedersen shared an X post, mentioning that Senator Tim Scott, the chairman of the US Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, had arranged for this upcoming meeting.

In early December, the chair had issued a warning that any delays would significantly impact the entire strategy adopted. To demonstrate the seriousness of the situation, reports alleged that Scott noted he could proceed without requiring bipartisan backing, that is, if negotiations were prolonged into early 2026. 

Senator Lummis calls for Democrats to participate in the markup

Senator Cynthia Lummis, a leading advocate for cryptocurrency, highlighted the obstacles facing the CLARITY Act and proposed potential solutions. On Monday, January 5, she stepped in to help advance the bill and explore ways to address industry challenges.

She argued that vague rules have long caused crypto companies to relocate overseas, noting that the proposed crypto legislation would alleviate uncertainty, establish clear rules, strengthen protections, and make the US a global leader.

Speaking on the bill, Lummis urged legislators on X: “Our market structure legislation changes that by establishing clear jurisdiction, strong protections, and ensuring America leads the way. Let’s get this done!”

The Senator emphasized the importance of Democrats participating in the markup. Based on her argument, such a move is crucial as it establishes a sense of connection to the structure, hence making them feel comfortable voting on the bill.

Analysts, on the other hand, raised the possibility that Lummis’s requirement may encounter backlash from individuals if the talks proceed. This situation sparked tension in the crypto industry. To address the controversy raised in the ecosystem, reports contacted Scott for comments on the matter.

When Scott was asked whether the table had a party-line markup, he indicated a likelihood of pushing through a bipartisan bill. Seeing that the situation continued to become complicated, the chair instructed the committee to proceed without revealing the members’ stand to avoid any delays.

Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

Market Opportunity
EPNS Logo
EPNS Price(PUSH)
$0.01106
$0.01106$0.01106
+0.18%
USD
EPNS (PUSH) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

The post Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Onyxcoin price action has entered a tense standoff between bulls
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/14 00:33
CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon

CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon

The post CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal highlighted Polygon’s lead in global bonds, Spiko US T-Bill, and Spiko Euro T-Bill. Polygon published an X post to share that its roadmap to GigaGas was still scaling. Sentiments around POL price were last seen to be bearish. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal shared key pointers from the Dune and RWA.xyz report. These pertain to highlights about RWA on Polygon. Simultaneously, Polygon underlined its roadmap towards GigaGas. Sentiments around POL price were last seen fumbling under bearish emotions. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal on Polygon RWA CEO Sandeep Nailwal highlighted three key points from the Dune and RWA.xyz report. The Chief Executive of Polygon maintained that Polygon PoS was hosting RWA TVL worth $1.13 billion across 269 assets plus 2,900 holders. Nailwal confirmed from the report that RWA was happening on Polygon. The Dune and https://t.co/W6WSFlHoQF report on RWA is out and it shows that RWA is happening on Polygon. Here are a few highlights: – Leading in Global Bonds: Polygon holds 62% share of tokenized global bonds (driven by Spiko’s euro MMF and Cashlink euro issues) – Spiko U.S.… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) September 17, 2025 The X post published by Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal underlined that the ecosystem was leading in global bonds by holding a 62% share of tokenized global bonds. He further highlighted that Polygon was leading with Spiko US T-Bill at approximately 29% share of TVL along with Ethereum, adding that the ecosystem had more than 50% share in the number of holders. Finally, Sandeep highlighted from the report that there was a strong adoption for Spiko Euro T-Bill with 38% share of TVL. He added that 68% of returns were on Polygon across all the chains. Polygon Roadmap to GigaGas In a different update from Polygon, the community…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:10