Us retail investors love a good show, and right now, nothing is more sensational than the incoming fight between Sam Altman’s OpenAI and Elon Musk’s SpaceX on theUs retail investors love a good show, and right now, nothing is more sensational than the incoming fight between Sam Altman’s OpenAI and Elon Musk’s SpaceX on the

Retail investors are already picking sides in the coming OpenAI vs SpaceX IPO showdown

Us retail investors love a good show, and right now, nothing is more sensational than the incoming fight between Sam Altman’s OpenAI and Elon Musk’s SpaceX on the stock market.

One’s promising to sell AI to every company with a laptop, the other wants to beam internet from space while building a bus to Mars.

But if you’re picking who’s going to actually win over the stock market, it’s OpenAI. At least that’s what the author of this article thinks. I mean, Sam (for all his warts) has cleaner books, clearer revenue, and more brains behind his company.

While Elon, charming as he can be, has SpaceX still burning through cash to fund rockets and satellites and Star Wars dreams.

And also, Sam doesn’t miss deadlines as often as Elon does.

We’re about to witness three of the biggest tech IPOs in history with OpenAI, SpaceX, and Anthropic all trying to lock in top dollar from an audience that’s already been burned by hype. Sure, we’re all mostly fond of Elon, but we are getting tired.

We want results, we want a plan, we want someone who isn’t sitting in a room sending thousands of controversial tweets every day in his mid-50s and calling for the abolishment of the European Union as well as literal war crimes.

Elon’s rocket math at SpaceX isn’t flying with retail anymore

Elon keeps trying to distract with shiny toys and Twitter drama, but Tesla stock is down year-over-year, returns are trash, and investors are starting to treat him like that friend who never pays you back.

The guy was just at dinner with President Trump to celebrate the illegal capture of Venezuela’s Maduro when he was calling him an alleged pedophile in that now-infamous but deleted tweet. His politics is the reason Tesla was dethroned as the world’s largest EV maker in 2025, as Cryptopolitan previously reported, and it is the reason sales have collapsed literally everywhere on earth. Guess Elon doesn’t care since, according to his best friend, Trump, “he is addicted to Fentanyl and is hardly ever sober.”

OpenAI, meanwhile, is dry on the outside, aggressive on the inside. Sam’s been winning lawsuits, keeping his head down, and focusing on enterprise deals. The court fight between him and Elon over OpenAI’s origin is still happening in San Francisco, but Sam came armed. His legal team?Morrison & Foerster and Wachtell Lipton.

Elon, meanwhile, is using boutique firms and one guy who moonlights as a clown, Jaymie Parkkinen. “All of my comedy friends; none of them can believe I’m a lawyer,” Parkkinen said. It’s not a metaphor. It’s in the court transcripts.

And while that circus plays out, OpenAI is already generating revenue. It’s not just a cool product. It’s a full enterprise pipeline. Microsoft’s invested. There are paying customers. Every time someone prompts ChatGPT, it’s money in the bank. The compute costs are high, but the demand is higher. And when this thing goes public, it’s going to hit like a hammer.

Jimmy Cramer even weighed in. “The biggest winner in a power gating scenario might be META,” he said, “because it can pull back on spending and not worry about OpenAI, which won’t be able to make its expensive buildout work either: not enough workers, too little equipment.” He may have a point. But if OpenAI gets public money flowing in, all that changes. Quickly.

Retail investors want to make bank, not see more chaos

OpenAI had hit a $500 billion valuation in October, and is now looking to double that with a $1 trillion IPO. Sam’s empire seems like a business that pays its employees ridiculously well, and Wall Street loves predictable cash flow, especially the kind that doesn’t need five years, government backing with taxpayer funds, a NASA puppet, and a launchpad to show up.

SpaceX sold shares last December at an $800 billion valuation, and Elon confirmed he wants to take it public in Q4 of 2026. But that date feels like every other Elon deadline; loud, confident, and so fake.

This guy is still trying to get Starship fully operational, and Starlink has turned into a weird mix of telecom company and satellite monopoly. I mean, yeah, it might eventually bring in recurring revenue, but right now, it’s just expensive, delayed, and sitting in orbit with no real business model behind it.

Samuel Kerr, who runs equity capital markets at Mergermarket, called the IPOs a “big market event” and even compared it to Saudi Aramco’s $1.88 trillion IPO in 2019. But Samuel also said OpenAI would be different.

Nick Patience from Futurum Group pointed out that OpenAI’s $1 trillion dream only works “if AGI is imminent,” which sounds like a joke, but still, retail is buying it.

Anthropic, built by ex-OpenAI staff, hit $350 billion last November. The company is marketed as the “safe AI” play; fewer headlines, more model efficiency, and tighter spending. Microsoft and Nvidia backed it.

But no one’s lining up to buy boring. The real show is always gonna be between the boys, Sam and Elon.

Retail traders love Wall Street-Silicon Valley drama, but they’re betting on structure

IPO watchers think this whole saga might shift how tech companies raise money. Samuel Kerr said it’s a break from the trend of staying private longer.

Back then, companies wanted to protect IP from reporting requirements. Now, the AI arms race needs money. And staying private doesn’t pay for 100,000 GPUs. That’s why these IPOs are finally happening.

Matthieu Wiltz, co-head of EMEA at JPMorgan, said there’s “strong demand from the market.” They’ve seen a 47% increase in deal value despite the chaos of global tariffs and wars. “There is an excess of liquidity,” he told Bloomberg, “so that’s why we sometimes need to refuse to do transactions if we think that covenants are not there.” But when there is structure, JPMorgan’s ready. And OpenAI has that structure.

Elon’s companies still run on vibes. Starlink might become a global utility. Maybe the space-based data center idea pans out. But no one’s holding breath. That “$1.5 trillion valuation” Kerr threw out for SpaceX? It’s only hype alone. And retail has been burned before. They remember the promises. They remember the earnings calls. And they remember the crashes.

Gen Z investors like Sam more than Elon. No one’s making TikToks about Starship engines. But they’re all using ChaGPT.

Market Opportunity
Talus Logo
Talus Price(US)
$0.00658
$0.00658$0.00658
-6.66%
USD
Talus (US) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Sui Mainnet Recovers After 6-Hour Network Stall: No Funds at Risk

Sui Mainnet Recovers After 6-Hour Network Stall: No Funds at Risk

On January 14, 2026, Sui Mainnet faced a significant disruption, leaving the network stalled for roughly six hours. The incident was caused by an internal divergence
Share
Tronweekly2026/01/17 09:30
Will There Be A ’28 Years Later 3’ After ‘The Bone Temple’? Here’s The Good News

Will There Be A ’28 Years Later 3’ After ‘The Bone Temple’? Here’s The Good News

The post Will There Be A ’28 Years Later 3’ After ‘The Bone Temple’? Here’s The Good News appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Chi Lewis-Parry and Ralph Fiennes
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/17 09:21
Urgent: Coinbase CEO Pushes for Crucial Crypto Market Structure Bill

Urgent: Coinbase CEO Pushes for Crucial Crypto Market Structure Bill

BitcoinWorld Urgent: Coinbase CEO Pushes for Crucial Crypto Market Structure Bill The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with significant developments as Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong recently took to Washington, D.C., advocating passionately for a clearer regulatory path. His mission? To champion the passage of a vital crypto market structure bill, specifically the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act. This legislative push is not just about policy; it’s about safeguarding investor rights and fostering innovation in the digital asset space. Why a Clear Crypto Market Structure Bill is Essential Brian Armstrong’s visit underscores a growing sentiment within the crypto industry: the urgent need for regulatory clarity. Without clear guidelines, the market operates in a gray area, leaving both innovators and investors vulnerable. The proposed crypto market structure bill aims to bring much-needed definition to this dynamic sector. Armstrong explicitly stated on X that this legislation is crucial to prevent a recurrence of actions that infringe on investor rights, citing past issues with former U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler. This proactive approach seeks to establish a stable and predictable environment for digital assets. Understanding the CLARITY Act: A Blueprint for Digital Assets The Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act is designed to establish a robust regulatory framework for the cryptocurrency industry. It seeks to delineate the responsibilities of key regulatory bodies, primarily the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Here are some key provisions: Clear Jurisdiction: The bill aims to specify which digital assets fall under the purview of the SEC as securities and which are considered commodities under the CFTC. Investor Protection: By defining these roles, the act intends to provide clearer rules for market participants, thereby enhancing investor protection. Exemption Conditions: A significant aspect of the bill would exempt certain cryptocurrencies from the stringent registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, provided they meet specific criteria. This could reduce regulatory burdens for legitimate projects. This comprehensive approach promises to bring structure to a rapidly evolving market. The Urgency Behind the Crypto Market Structure Bill The call for a dedicated crypto market structure bill is not new, but Armstrong’s direct engagement highlights the increasing pressure for legislative action. The lack of a clear framework has led to regulatory uncertainty, stifling innovation and sometimes leading to enforcement actions that many in the industry view as arbitrary. Passing this legislation would: Foster Innovation: Provide a clear roadmap for developers and entrepreneurs, encouraging new projects and technologies. Boost Investor Confidence: Offer greater certainty and protection for individuals investing in digital assets. Prevent Future Conflicts: Reduce the likelihood of disputes between regulatory bodies and crypto firms, creating a more harmonious ecosystem. The industry believes that a well-defined regulatory landscape is essential for the long-term health and growth of the digital economy. What a Passed Crypto Market Structure Bill Could Mean for You If the CLARITY Act or a similar crypto market structure bill passes, its impact could be profound for everyone involved in the crypto space. For investors, it could mean a more secure and transparent market. For businesses, it offers a predictable environment to build and scale. Conversely, continued regulatory ambiguity could: Stifle Growth: Drive innovation overseas and deter new entrants. Increase Risks: Leave investors exposed to unregulated practices. Create Uncertainty: Lead to ongoing legal battles and market instability. The stakes are incredibly high, making the advocacy efforts of leaders like Brian Armstrong all the more critical. The push for a clear crypto market structure bill is a pivotal moment for the digital asset industry. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong’s efforts in Washington, D.C., reflect a widespread desire for regulatory clarity that protects investors, fosters innovation, and ensures the long-term viability of cryptocurrencies. The CLARITY Act offers a potential blueprint for this future, aiming to define jurisdictional boundaries and streamline regulatory requirements. Its passage could unlock significant growth and stability, cementing the U.S. as a leader in the global digital economy. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) What is the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act? The CLARITY Act is a proposed crypto market structure bill aimed at establishing a clear regulatory framework for digital assets in the U.S. It seeks to define the roles of the SEC and CFTC and exempt certain cryptocurrencies from securities registration requirements under specific conditions. Why is Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong advocating for this bill? Brian Armstrong is advocating for the CLARITY Act to bring regulatory certainty to the crypto industry, protect investor rights from unclear enforcement actions, and foster innovation within the digital asset space. He believes it’s crucial for the industry’s sustainable growth. How would this bill impact crypto investors? For crypto investors, the passage of this crypto market structure bill would mean greater clarity on which assets are regulated by whom, potentially leading to enhanced consumer protections, reduced market uncertainty, and a more stable investment environment. What are the primary roles of the SEC and CFTC concerning this bill? The bill aims to delineate the responsibilities of the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) and the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) regarding digital assets. It seeks to clarify which assets fall under securities regulation and which are considered commodities, reducing jurisdictional ambiguity. What could happen if a crypto market structure bill like CLARITY Act does not pass? If a clear crypto market structure bill does not pass, the industry may continue to face regulatory uncertainty, potentially leading to stifled innovation, increased legal challenges for crypto companies, and a less secure environment for investors due to inconsistent enforcement and unclear rules. Did you find this article insightful? Share it with your network to help spread awareness about the crucial discussions shaping the future of digital assets! To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping crypto regulation and institutional adoption. This post Urgent: Coinbase CEO Pushes for Crucial Crypto Market Structure Bill first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 20:35