The post Nasdaq filed to tokenize stocks, and it is about collateral appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belongThe post Nasdaq filed to tokenize stocks, and it is about collateral appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong

Nasdaq filed to tokenize stocks, and it is about collateral

Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.

In September, Nasdaq filed proposed rule changes enabling the trading of tokenized securities that would still settle through DTC, the traditional U.S. clearing and settlement system. Weeks later, Binance approved BlackRock’s tokenized Treasury fund as collateral for off-exchange institutional activity via triparty arrangements (including Ceffu). The push is on for assets that move faster and can post as margin automatically.

Summary

  • Tokenization is shifting from wrappers to infrastructure: regulators and institutions are aligning on tokenized assets as regulated collateral that settles through existing rails (DTC/DTCC), not parallel crypto markets.
  • The real innovation is collateral mobility: firms like JPMorgan, BlackRock, and Nasdaq are building systems where tokenized Treasuries, equities, and funds post as margin, rebalance automatically, and move in seconds.
  • 2026 is the multi-asset inflection point: connecting tokenized equities, debt, stablecoins, and commodities into unified collateral engines will unlock liquidity, compress friction, and redefine how yield is generated.

Tokenized equities remain subject to the full securities framework, and the SEC is still clarifying the market-structure details — especially around venues, intermediaries, and how execution should be governed. In December, we got a clearer signal of where this is heading when the agency granted DTCC’s clearing subsidiary a three-year no-action relief to tokenize DTC-custodied assets — including Russell 1000 stocks, major index ETFs, and U.S. Treasuries — on approved blockchains starting in 2026. The trajectory is clear: the world’s biggest institutions are already building for a future where tokenized assets function as regulated collateral, not speculative wrappers.

Recently, BlackRock’s Larry Fink wrote that tokenization is where the internet was in 1996, before Amazon became Amazon. Days later, SEC Chairman Paul Atkins said tokenization has the potential to completely change the financial system over the next couple of years. These statements would have been unthinkable three years ago, but they are now the consensus among the people who run the largest pools of capital on the planet.

The tokenized real-world asset market now sits at $18.6 billion in distributed value, with over 570,000 holders. Add stablecoins — already well over $300 billion in circulating supply — and you’re looking at a settlement layer approaching the scale of a meaningful global financial rail. Major forecasts project $4 trillion or more by 2030. But market size is only one piece of a more important shift; what are these assets actually being used for?

Tokenizing an asset, on its own, creates a wrapper. A wrapper does nothing. The value appears when the asset enters a system that can use it: price it, rebalance it, lend against it, hedge it, and account for it across multiple positions simultaneously.

The institutions moving fastest aren’t just minting tokenized assets. They’re building collateral systems, rails that let tokenized assets function as margin, settle instantly, and move between positions without friction.

JPMorgan’s Tokenized Collateral Network converts money market fund shares into collateral that moves in seconds instead of days. BlackRock’s BUIDL is being used not just as a yield product, but as institutional collateral in off-exchange workflows via triparty arrangements. And Nasdaq’s approach matters because it doesn’t build a parallel market. Tokenized securities in its proposal would settle through DTC, the same settlement plumbing that handles trillions in traditional equities. To a prime broker, both versions can look operationally familiar, except the tokenized version can be programmed to post automatically, clear more seamlessly, and rebalance against other positions. In parallel, the SEC’s no-action relief for DTC formalizes that same idea at the core of U.S. market plumbing, while Coinbase prepares to list tokenized U.S. equities alongside crypto, and Tether (USDT) openly explores tokenizing its own equity to provide onchain liquidity for investors.

On the debt side, JPMorgan’s $50 million commercial paper issuance for Galaxy Digital on Solana (SOL) — settled entirely in USDC (USDC) — demonstrates what it looks like when bank-run money markets themselves become tokenized collateral flows.

Right now, each of these systems tends to map to one asset class or one workflow. JPMorgan moves money market shares. BUIDL posts as institutional collateral in specific arrangements. Nasdaq’s filing targets tokenized securities with DTC settlement. DTC’s new service will cover blue-chip stocks, ETFs, and Treasuries, and Coinbase’s plans center on exchange-listed equities. The next step — and the real 2026 inflection — is to connect them.

Imagine a single collateral system where Treasuries, equities, and gold function as one pool. A treasury manager holds tokenized short-duration Treasuries, tokenized gold, and exposure to tokenized equities. Today, these sit in separate custody arrangements with separate accounting and separate liquidation logic. In a collateral engine, they function as a programmable balance sheet. The system rebalances risk automatically, adjusts collateral ratios as prices move, and unlocks liquidity without forcing a sale.

This changes what yield products can look like: a liquidity position combining a stablecoin with a tokenized equity index, producing income inside the same instrument. Yield and protection structures that once required institutional minimums can be assembled from smaller positions and offered far more broadly.

The set of acceptable collateral will keep expanding. Tokenized short-duration credit, structured notes, regulated fund shares, sovereign debt from multiple jurisdictions  — anything that can be securely stored, priced, and verified onchain becomes usable.

Fink is right about the 1996 comparison, but the analogy needs one adjustment. The internet in 1996 was about information moving faster. Tokenization is about collateral moving faster. The point isn’t that assets live on a blockchain. It’s that they stop sitting still. Collateral that can rebalance itself, post automatically, and move across positions without friction is capital that finally earns what it should. Most capital sits idle because moving it is expensive and slow. Multi-asset collateral changes that. The portfolio becomes liquid, and the yield follows.
That is where the value of the next cycle will be created  — and the true infrastructure story of 2026.

Artem Tolkachev

Artem Tolkachev is a tech entrepreneur and RWA strategy lead at Falcon Finance with a background in law and fintech. He founded one of the first blockchain-focused legal practices in the CIS, was later acquired by a global consulting firm, and pioneered the region’s first Big Four Blockchain Lab. Over the past decade, he has advised major corporations, invested in startups, and built ventures across blockchain, cryptocurrencies, and automation. A recognized speaker and commentator, he focuses on bridging digital assets with traditional finance and advancing the adoption of decentralized finance worldwide.

Source: https://crypto.news/nasdaq-filed-tokenize-stocks-filing-about-collateral/

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.0005709
$0.0005709$0.0005709
-1.70%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SUI Price Eyes Breakout, Targets $11 Says Analyst

SUI Price Eyes Breakout, Targets $11 Says Analyst

The post SUI Price Eyes Breakout, Targets $11 Says Analyst appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SUI price shows a technical setup for a macro breakout with analyst Dan Gambardello targeting $10-$11 levels. Recent partnership with Google’s Agentic Payments Protocol adds fundamental support to the technical analysis as SUI moves closer to potential breakout levels. SUI Price Analysis Points to $10-$11 Breakout Target Dan Gambardello has identified a clear ascending triangle formation on SUI price daily chart with upside targets around $10.79. The analyst simplified this target range to $10-$11 for practical trading purposes. The pattern shows sustained higher lows meeting resistance at current levels before a potential breakout. VanEck maintains more aggressive SUI crypto targets ranging from $13-$25 according to Gambardello’s research. SUI Price Analysis | Source: Dan Gambardello, X The $10 level is a more conservative higher high area for the current cycle. Midterm targets point to $7.50 in the 1.618 Fibonacci extension zone before longer-term objectives. The monthly RSI shows extreme compression that Gambardello describes as “screaming for a macro breakout to the upside.” This momentum oscillator behavior typically precedes major price movements in the crypto market. SUI crypto risk model currently sits at 51 and matches pre-bull market levels seen in coins like Ethereum. Gambardello compared this to Ethereum’s December 2020 reading of 51 before its major breakout. The March 2017 Ethereum reading of 53 preceded that cycle’s parabolic move. The analyst also noted that SUI price trades near the same levels from almost a year ago in November 2024. Bollinger Bands Signal Historic Compression CryptoBullet has identified the tightest Bollinger Bands in SUI’s entire trading history on the weekly chart. The BBW indicator compression reached levels that were historically followed by major price movements. This setup mirrors conditions before SUI’s previous major rallies. Historical data shows SUI price delivered +253% gains between December 2023 and March 2024 following similar compression. SUI…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 11:32
How Zero Knowledge Proof Is Changing Blockchain Performance Forever

How Zero Knowledge Proof Is Changing Blockchain Performance Forever

The post How Zero Knowledge Proof Is Changing Blockchain Performance Forever appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto Projects Learn how Zero Knowledge Proof
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/13 04:11