Washington’s push to break up America’s biggest tech companies is not going well. Over the past year, authorities have failed to persuade judges to order companiesWashington’s push to break up America’s biggest tech companies is not going well. Over the past year, authorities have failed to persuade judges to order companies

U.S. courts block efforts to force breakups of tech giants like Google and Meta

Washington’s push to break up America’s biggest tech companies is not going well.

Over the past year, authorities have failed to persuade judges to order companies like Google and Meta to sell off significant portions of their businesses. For example, Instagram and Chrome. For what many considered to be the most severe crackdown on tech monopolies in decades, these losses are a major issue.

The setbacks come while separate cases against Apple and Amazon are still pending. It’s raising real doubts about whether the government’s strategy for reining in these giants will work at all.

Final answers could be years away with all the appeals that are expected. But the recent defeats give tech bosses like Mark Zuckerberg new chances to push the Trump administration for lighter treatment on monopoly enforcement.

Fast changes in artificial intelligence have weighed heavily on decisions that went Big Tech’s way.

Take the Google search case. Judge Amit Mehta ruled in August that the company spent billions on exclusive deals to keep an illegal monopoly in internet search. But he handed Google a big win in September when he refused to order sales of Chrome or Android, which is what the Justice Department wanted.

Mehta said the threat to Google’s search business—worth about $200 billion a year—from AI chatbots was a major reason he went with softer penalties.

Courts are exercising caution when making extreme decisions, such as dismantling businesses valued at trillions of dollars.

Courts reject breakup orders as AI reshapes competition

Take a look at the other Google case about digital advertisements. In April, Judge Leonie Brinkema declared that Google had “wilfully” monopolized a portion of the online advertising industry. However, she publicly expressed concern about prosecutors’ desire to divide up Google’s advertising business.

Brinkema pointed out that no one had found a buyer for Google’s ad exchange yet. She said she was “concerned” that the whole divestiture idea was at a “fairly abstract level.”

The FTC and Justice Department didn’t respond when asked to comment.

After Mehta’s ruling, Gail Slater—who runs the Justice Department’s antitrust division under Donald Trump—said she was looking at her options and “thinking through whether the ordered relief goes far enough.”

After the Meta decision, the FTC said it was “deeply disappointed” and was “reviewing all our options.”

The Google search and Meta cases both started during Trump’s first term. They marked a new era of going after monopolies after decades where agencies didn’t try anything this big against tech companies. The last time something similar happened was a 1998 Justice Department complaint against Microsoft.

Biden-era officials, including Kanter and former FTC commissioner Lina Khan, ramped up monopoly lawsuits in a major way. They went after sectors beyond tech and brought the Google advertising case, plus suits claiming Amazon hurt customers, rivals, and sellers, and that Apple monopolised smartphone markets.

Amazon and Apple say the lawsuits are wrong on the facts and the law. Their trials are set for 2027.

The 2025 tech rulings demonstrate how attempts to combat market dominance may be hampered by enforcement delays.

Kanter said monopoly cases filed in the past four years “should have been brought 10 years earlier. The remedies would have been quite straightforward and achievable.”

In his opinion, Judge Boasberg seemed to agree. He stressed that things had “changed markedly” since the FTC sued Meta in 2020.

These cases have also put a spotlight on how to regulate new technologies like AI.

Slater, talking about AI in September, said creating fair competition through antitrust enforcement “is always important, but it is crucial where the technology is still developing rapidly.”

Getting courts to use their authority was “one of the reasons why it’s important to bring big, ambitious cases,” he said. “Once you establish that the rule of law applies, in time, the remedies will follow.

Join Bybit now and claim a $50 bonus in minutes

Market Opportunity
Union Logo
Union Price(U)
$0.003179
$0.003179$0.003179
-8.25%
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Stop Buying memecoins from My X Posts

Stop Buying memecoins from My X Posts

The post Stop Buying memecoins from My X Posts appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Changpeng Zhao, the former CEO of Binance, has issued a stern warning to his
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/13 17:21
Solana Policy Institute Urges SEC to Exclude DeFi Developers from Broker Regulations in Crucial Policy Shift

Solana Policy Institute Urges SEC to Exclude DeFi Developers from Broker Regulations in Crucial Policy Shift

BitcoinWorld Solana Policy Institute Urges SEC to Exclude DeFi Developers from Broker Regulations in Crucial Policy Shift WASHINGTON, D.C. – March 15, 2025 – The
Share
bitcoinworld2026/01/13 17:45
Aster token pumps more than 500% post-TGE launch

Aster token pumps more than 500% post-TGE launch

The post Aster token pumps more than 500% post-TGE launch appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. ASTER token soars 550% to $0.52 post-TGE. Total value locked catapulted to $1 billion, doubling pre-launch figures. Aster’s debut bolsters BNB Chain’s ecosystem, boosting the BNB price. The Aster ($ASTER) token’s debut saw it hit $0.58, rocketing by more than 500% within hours. Aster then slightly pared the gains as traders looked for profits post-TGE and airdrop distribution for the YZi Labs-backed protocol. Altcoins such as Lagrange, EigenLayer and BNB have outshone the broader market. Launching at an initial price of approximately $0.08, the token swiftly ascended to a peak of $0.52. It is a move that encompassed a staggering 550% gain in its first trading session and saw ASTER’s market capitalization rally past the $800 million threshold. On debut, Aster rose to rank among the top 150 cryptocurrencies by market cap. A significant first step for $ASTER on BNB Chain. • $345M traded in 24h• Price reached $0.528 (~1,650%)• 330K new wallets joined• TVL $660M → $1.005B• Platform volume near $1.5B Thanks to our community for the trust and support. We’ll keep focusing on building an open… pic.twitter.com/cgPlwb2FVh — Aster (@Aster_DEX) September 18, 2025 As the token’s price pumped, daily volume rose to over $420 million in the initial 24 hours, up 1800%. While the 500% climb validates Aster’s utility in perpetual trading, bulls have to be aware of a potential sharp pullback if price overextends into the overbought territory. Aster TVL jumps to $1 billion Aster’s total value locked has exceeded expectations, surging to over $1 billion within days of the TGE in a milestone that represents a more than twofold increase from pre-launch figures of around $400 million, attracting over 330,000 new wallets and solidifying Aster’s position as the second-largest perpetual DEX globally. The influx highlights the platform’s multi-chain prowess, spanning BNB Chain, Ethereum, Solana, and Arbitrum,…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 00:10