Americans who put money in foreign stocks last year did way better than those who stayed within the home market. An exchange-traded fund tracking the MSCI all-countryAmericans who put money in foreign stocks last year did way better than those who stayed within the home market. An exchange-traded fund tracking the MSCI all-country

International stocks returned roughly 33% to U.S. investors in 2025, far outpacing the S&P 500's 18% return

Americans who put money in foreign stocks last year did way better than those who stayed within the home market. An exchange-traded fund tracking the MSCI all-country world ex-U.S. index brought in roughly 33% returns to U.S. investors in 2025.

The index covers 85% of stock investments available outside America. The S&P 500 returned about 18% over the same period.

Two things matter when you invest overseas. How stocks perform in their local markets, and what happens with the dollar. When the dollar gets weaker, your foreign holdings are worth more dollars back home.

The dollar dropped around 9% last year against a basket of other currencies, FactSet data shows. That helped pump up returns.

“De-dollarization” was everywhere in 2025. Concerns about U.S. government spending and political turmoil sent investors looking elsewhere. Foreign stocks got attention. So did gold and crypto.

Foreign markets beat U.S. without currency help

Currency moves don’t tell the whole story, though. Goldman Sachs analysts had pushed clients toward global diversification in 2025. They broke down major market performance using four measures: earnings growth, valuations, dividends, and currency shifts.

Almost every major index they studied beat the S&P 500 through mid-December, even without currency gains. France’s CAC 40 was the exception.

Japan’s MSCI index returned around 25% in 2025 despite the yen staying flat against the dollar. South Korea’s benchmark soared about 100% in dollar terms. Spain’s index climbed more than 60% in euros alone.

Valuations drove a lot of this, Goldman Sachs found. Investors paid more for each unit of earnings in these markets.

Take the price-earnings-growth ratio. The gap between U.S. and international PEG ratios narrowed by almost a third through mid-December 2025, according to Goldman Sachs. American stocks still traded at a premium. By mid-December, that premium stood at more than double the average since 2005.

Some analysts expect the gap to keep closing. Yardeni Research recently said it “no longer makes much sense” to recommend clients “overweight” U.S. stocks. The firm had given that advice since 2010. International stocks look cheaper based on forward price-to-earnings ratios. Plus, corporate earnings globally have stayed solid.

“It’s a big world with many countries having large populations that aspire to a better standard of living. Globalization isn’t dead,” Yardeni Research wrote.

Tech stocks still dominate overseas indexes

Banks and financial companies make up the biggest chunk of the MSCI all-country ex-U.S. benchmark. But here’s something interesting – the top five individual stocks are all tech companies. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, the Netherlands’ ASML, China’s Alibaba and Tencent, and Korea’s Samsung Electronics.

Does this mean international stocks don’t really diversify away from America’s tech-heavy market? Peter Oppenheimer, Goldman’s chief global equity strategist and head of macro research in Europe, says not necessarily. Tech stocks started moving more independently in 2025, he noted. Picking winners got riskier because you’re more likely to pick a loser.

“What you should be doing is seeking more diversification within tech,” Oppenheimer says.

Nobody can predict what 2026 will bring. Maybe the dollar strengthens. Foreign earnings could stumble. U.S. valuations might shift. But the odds of everything moving together are slim. That’s the whole point of spreading bets globally – the advantages come from different directions.

If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Market Opportunity
Union Logo
Union Price(U)
$0.004149
$0.004149$0.004149
-6.68%
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Fed Decides On Interest Rates Today—Here’s What To Watch For

Fed Decides On Interest Rates Today—Here’s What To Watch For

The post Fed Decides On Interest Rates Today—Here’s What To Watch For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline The Federal Reserve on Wednesday will conclude a two-day policymaking meeting and release a decision on whether to lower interest rates—following months of pressure and criticism from President Donald Trump—and potentially signal whether additional cuts are on the way. President Donald Trump has urged the central bank to “CUT INTEREST RATES, NOW, AND BIGGER” than they might plan to. Getty Images Key Facts The central bank is poised to cut interest rates by at least a quarter-point, down from the 4.25% to 4.5% range where they have been held since December to between 4% and 4.25%, as Wall Street has placed 100% odds of a rate cut, according to CME’s FedWatch, with higher odds (94%) on a quarter-point cut than a half-point (6%) reduction. Fed governors Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman, both Trump appointees, voted in July for a quarter-point reduction to rates, and they may dissent again in favor of a large cut alongside Stephen Miran, Trump’s Council of Economic Advisers’ chair, who was sworn in at the meeting’s start on Tuesday. It’s unclear whether other policymakers, including Kansas City Fed President Jeffrey Schmid and St. Louis Fed President Alberto Musalem, will favor larger cuts or opt for no reduction. Fed Chair Jerome Powell said in his Jackson Hole, Wyoming, address last month the central bank would likely consider a looser monetary policy, noting the “shifting balance of risks” on the U.S. economy “may warrant adjusting our policy stance.” David Mericle, an economist for Goldman Sachs, wrote in a note the “key question” for the Fed’s meeting is whether policymakers signal “this is likely the first in a series of consecutive cuts” as the central bank is anticipated to “acknowledge the softening in the labor market,” though they may not “nod to an October cut.” Mericle said he…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:23
Stablecoin Payments: South Korean Card Giants Launch Crucial Second Task Force for Digital Currency Integration

Stablecoin Payments: South Korean Card Giants Launch Crucial Second Task Force for Digital Currency Integration

BitcoinWorld Stablecoin Payments: South Korean Card Giants Launch Crucial Second Task Force for Digital Currency Integration SEOUL, South Korea – February 2025
Share
bitcoinworld2026/01/05 10:55