Claims surfaced on dark web forums alleging access to Kraken’s internal support systems is being sold, though no evidence has confirmed a breach.Claims surfaced on dark web forums alleging access to Kraken’s internal support systems is being sold, though no evidence has confirmed a breach.

Dark web listing claims access to Kraken support system

Claims that access to Kraken’s internal customer support systems is being offered for sale on a dark web forum are currently making rounds on X, even as the evidence backing the alleged breach is largely unverified.

According to web activity monitoring social account Dark Web Informer, a read-only version of Kraken’s internal support panel is on the market, being sold for as little as $1, and is supposedly negotiable. 

A snapshot of the dark web forum shows user “ransomcharger” telling their associates that the access would allow the viewing of user profiles and transaction histories, and could generate customer support tickets to phish customers or extract private information.

Kraken support access could expose customer info for 2 months

According to the listing, the access is reportedly not restricted by IP address, proxied through Kraken’s own systems. It can retrieve full know-your-customer (KYC) documents, including identification cards, selfies, proof of address, and declared sources of funds. 

The access is reportedly valid for at least one to two months before rotation, with time-based authentication codes expiring in February. However, Cryptopolitan has not found any other independent confirmation or evidence supporting the allegation, and Kraken’s support team has not acknowledged any compromise of its internal systems.

In mid-2025, Cryptopolitan had reported that Kraken and Binance were targeted by the same social engineering campaign that resulted in a successful customer data breach at Coinbase. According to people familiar with the matter, attackers contacted customer support agents at the exchanges and enticed them with bribes in exchange for user data. 

Coinbase executive Brian Armstrong issued a statement saying several overseas customer service representatives accepted the bribes and provided information that included customer names, addresses, partial KYC records, and account balances.

The attackers later attempted to extort Coinbase, demanding a $20 million ransom in exchange for deleting the stolen data, according to people familiar with the investigation. Coinbase declined to pay the ransom and instead notified law enforcement authorities.

The breach exposed Coinbase to potential losses estimated at up to $400 million. However, for Kraken and Binance, the social engineering attempt was thwarted through layered access restrictions and real-time monitoring of support interactions.

Binance has said it uses artificial intelligence systems to monitor conversations between customer support agents and users in several languages. Those systems can flag suspicious behavior like potential bribery attempts, and automatically terminate communications when risks are detected.

Kraken has said it employs internal safeguards that limit unnecessary access to customer information and monitor anomalous activity within its systems. 

Coinbase helps law enforcement arrest service agent in India

Just last week, Coinbase CEO Armstrong revealed to the public that a former customer service agent for the exchange was arrested in India, months after the support representative gave hackers access to customer data.

A Coinbase spokesperson confirmed the arrest and said it came on the heels of a coordinative effort with law enforcement agencies from several jurisdictions, helping the security groups identify and prosecute those involved.

The Brooklyn District Attorney’s Office also announced charges against a Brooklyn man accused of orchestrating “a long-running impersonation scheme” on Coinbase customers in the US.

According to the indictment, the defendant posed as a Coinbase representative and used social engineering to convince victims that their accounts were at immediate risk. The Department of Justice mentioned that he directed victims to transfer funds to wallets under his control and took away nearly $16 million from approximately 100 victims. However, more than $600,000 has been recovered so far. 

If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Sui Ecosystem Gains Spotlight as Taipei Builders Demo Day Highlights New DeFi Ideas

Sui Ecosystem Gains Spotlight as Taipei Builders Demo Day Highlights New DeFi Ideas

Sui Taipei Builders’ Demo Day brings developers, investors, and enthusiasts together to present blockchain projects. The Sui ecosystem will host the Taipei Builders
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2026/01/03 00:00
Stability World AI Makes AI Accessible and Ownable for People

Stability World AI Makes AI Accessible and Ownable for People

Stability World AI blends AI agents with blockchain incentives to promoting trust, accessibility, shared ownership of AI through user-driven governance.
Share
Blockchainreporter2026/01/03 00:00