All in all, the 2026 budget is more of the same. They removed flood control allocations but made up for it in other ways.All in all, the 2026 budget is more of the same. They removed flood control allocations but made up for it in other ways.

[In This Economy] Ushering in 2026 with the first reenacted budget in 7 years: What now?

2026/01/02 15:00

 Happy New Year!

With President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. failing to sign the national budget, we are entering 2026 with a “reenacted budget,” if only for a few days or weeks.

This is set to be the first reenacted budget since 2019. In that year, the budget was also stymied by controversies and frictions surrounding pork allocations and insertions. Old governance problems are hounding us in 2026.

What led to the 2019 reenacted budget? For starters, former budget secretary Benjamin Diokno was accused by the late representative Rolando Andaya of inserting at least P2.8 billion of infrastructure budgets that will benefit Casiguran, Sorsogon. Why Casiguran? Its mayor then was the husband of the mother-in-law of Diokno’s daughter, while Sorsogon’s vice governor then was the mother-in-law of Diokno’s daughter.

This and other budget insertions were allegedly facilitated by Amenah Pangandaman, Diokno’s closest budget undersecretary, who was said to have given a thumb drive to a Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) staff member containing a list of P51 billion worth of infrastructure projects. Total insertions that year allegedly reached P75 billion.

Eerily, this brings to mind the recent and alleged tug-of-war of files between Representative Leandro Leviste and the late public works undersecretary Catalina Cabral. Cabral was said to possess a list of projects that are “allocable” to lawmakers, and Representative Leviste allegedly snatched those files from Cabral’s office back in September 2025. Leviste said such files were given to him, not stolen. At any rate, it’s quite clear that the budget of the Department of Public Works and Highways is a crucial entry point of politicians’ pork, then and now.

Going back to 2019, Diokno vehemently denied the allegations levelled against him by Andaya. But not long after, Diokno stepped down and moved on to become the governor of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (a golden parachute). He brought with him Pangandaman to the BSP. Incidentally, both would figure prominently in the early Cabinet of President Marcos Jr.: in 2022, Diokno returned as finance secretary, while Pangandaman became budget secretary — until she resigned recently, in November 2025, amid the flood control scandal.

Former House speaker Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo also inserted tons of pork in the 2019 budget for her own legislative district, amounting to P2.4 billion. Reacting to this, Senator Leila de Lima, who was detained at Camp Crame at the behest of former president Rodrigo Duterte, said in a dispatch, “It is scandalous and shameless, but hardly a surprise. We do not expect anything less from Speaker Arroyo who, during her rule as President, was known for putting self-interest above public service.”

What’s more, even after the 2019 budget bicameral conference committee or bicam, the House managed to play around with the Department of Health’s budget, specifically its Health Facilities Enhancement Program or HFEP. This is highly anomalous, because Congress ought to stick with the draft bill approved by the bicam. But the House allegedly distributed the P4.5 billion allotted to the House of Representatives, chopping up that pork budget and allocating it among its members. Supposedly, much of that fund went to Arroyo’s allies (supporters of her House leadership), while a much smaller amount went to non-allies.

In total, as much as P75 billion of projects were realigned after the bicam under the Local Infrastructure Program.

This maneuver led to a budget impasse, led by Senator Panfilo Lacson, a known fiscalizer. The country entered 2019 with no new budget, and in March 2019 president Duterte met with congressional leaders to fix the deadlock. It was only later that month that the Senate submitted the enrolled bill, albeit with “strong reservations.” 

In mid-April 2019, Duterte finally signed the budget, literally unceremoniously (journalists were only informed by text message that Duterte had already signed the bill). But Duterte ended up vetoing as much as P95.3 billion worth of DPWH projects that were “not part of [his] priority projects,” and assigned some projects for “conditional implementation.” These include “the allowance and benefits of teachers and creation of teaching positions, construction of evacuation centers, funding for foreign-assisted projects, revolving fund, and lump-sum appropriations for capital outlays, as well as financial assistance to local government units and funding requirements of our foreign service.”

What now?

Fast-forward to 2026, pork hobbles the budget once more, specifically pork lodged under the DPWH.

House lawmakers tried their darndest to insert projects under the DPWH, not under flood control but mainly for farm-to-market roads (now to be overseen by the Department of Agriculture) and the HFEP (which also plays a role now — an echo to the 2019 controversy).

In a highly irregular move, DPWH Secretary Vince Dizon also appeared before the bicam to lobby the restoration of P54 billion worth of funding. This intervention by the executive created an impasse and the Senate stood its ground, leading to a full stoppage of the bicam proceedings. Eventually, the Senate allowed a partial restoration of the DPWH budget.

The ball is now with President Marcos, and as I write this the Palace is scrutinizing the enrolled budget bill for 2026. What should he do?

If he’s really committed to show the people that he’s reforming the budget (the root of all evil, so to speak), he might take a leaf from what former president Rodrigo Duterte did in 2019, and veto tons of needless pork projects that they’re not part of his priorities.

Back in December 2024, Marcos vetoed P194 billion, P168.240 billion of which were unprogrammed funds and the rest (P26.065 billion) were DPWH projects. For the 2026 budget, he will most likely veto a portion of the P243-billion unprogrammed funds as well. But this will do nothing, really, because unprogrammed appropriations can’t be spent on unless there are excess revenues or new loans.

If Marcos is really sincere, he will push for reforms to remove unprogrammed funds entirely in the 2027 budget and beyond. Cases have been filed before the Supreme Court to rule unprogrammed funds unconstitutional (because of the way they have been abused in the budget process). But Marcos will do well to move ahead of this Supreme Court decision and push Congress to pass a law banning unprogrammed funds forever.

But I doubt this will happen. If he were really sincere, he would’ve done so years ago, and stop related perversions like the plundering of the coffers of PhilHealth and the Philippine Deposit Insurance Corporation. Also, Marcos knows that bringing home pork projects is the primary game played in the House of Representatives, and his relatives benefitted from this scheme of late. In fact, a report of the Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism (PCIJ) found that a big bulk of “allocable” projects went to Marcos’ son Sandro and cousin Martin Romualdez.

All in all, the 2026 budget is more of the same. They removed flood control allocations but made up for it in other ways. But truth be told, I’m not really disappointed: in the first place, I didn’t have my hopes up that significant reforms will take place. – Rappler.com

Dr. JC Punongbayan is an assistant professor at the UP School of Economics and the author of False Nostalgia: The Marcos “Golden Age” Myths and How to Debunk Them. In 2024, he received The Outstanding Young Men (TOYM) Award for economics. Follow him on Instagram (@jcpunongbayan).

Must Read

[In This Economy] When corruption drowns growth: The PH economy in 2025

Market Opportunity
Nowchain Logo
Nowchain Price(NOW)
$0.0006
$0.0006$0.0006
+22.44%
USD
Nowchain (NOW) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

ArtGis Finance Partners with MetaXR to Expand its DeFi Offerings in the Metaverse

ArtGis Finance Partners with MetaXR to Expand its DeFi Offerings in the Metaverse

By using this collaboration, ArtGis utilizes MetaXR’s infrastructure to widen access to its assets and enable its customers to interact with the metaverse.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 00:07
The Best Parental Control Apps for 2026: Top Picks for Screen Time, Web Filtering, and Location Safety

The Best Parental Control Apps for 2026: Top Picks for Screen Time, Web Filtering, and Location Safety

Choosing a parental control app isn’t just about blocking websites. The best tools help families set healthy boundaries without turning daily life into constant
Share
Techbullion2026/01/20 00:39
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41