Debugging microservices is hard because it's difficult to see the data flowing between them. We built a "Request Capture Engine" that acts like a flight recorderDebugging microservices is hard because it's difficult to see the data flowing between them. We built a "Request Capture Engine" that acts like a flight recorder

Building a Better Debugging Experience: A Deep Dive into Capturing and Replaying gRPC Traffic

Debugging in a complex microservices architecture can feel like navigating a maze in the dark. When a request fails or returns unexpected data, the trail often goes cold at the service boundary. You know what you sent, and you know what you got back, but the crucial "why" is locked away inside a black box. What if you could install a flight recorder on every service, transparently recording every interaction for perfect recall and inspection?

This post is a deep dive into how we built such a system—a "Request Capture Engine"—from the ground up using standard, open-source components. We'll walk through the architecture, the code, and the powerful new debugging workflows it unlocks.

The Core Mechanism: How to Intercept gRPC Calls

The foundation of our capture system is a feature built directly into gRPC: interceptors. An interceptor is a middleware function that can "intercept" an incoming or outgoing RPC, allowing you to inspect and modify the request, the response, and the call's context.

For a client-side unary (request-response) call, the concept is simple. Instead of the client calling the server directly, it calls the interceptor, which then invokes the actual RPC. This gives us the perfect hook to record the data.

Here’s a simplified example of what a client interceptor looks like in Go:

func UnaryPayloadCaptureInterceptor() grpc.UnaryClientInterceptor { return func( ctx context.Context, method string, req, reply interface{}, cc *grpc.ClientConn, invoker grpc.UnaryInvoker, opts ...grpc.CallOption, ) error { // 1. Record the request payload before the call recordRequest(ctx, req) // 2. Invoke the actual RPC err := invoker(ctx, method, req, reply, cc, opts...) // 3. Record the response payload after the call recordResponse(ctx, reply, err) return err } }

This same principle can be extended to server-side interceptors (to capture what a service receives) and, crucially, to streaming RPCs.

Building the Capture Engine: A Step-by-Step Guide

Capturing Payloads and the Role of OpenTelemetry

To build a complete picture of an interaction, we need to capture the request and response, and we need a way to link them together. This is where distributed tracing comes in. Our system relies on OpenTelemetry, the industry standard for observability.

When a request enters our system, OpenTelemetry assigns it a unique trace_id. As that request travels from one service to another, this trace_id is propagated in the gRPC metadata. Each hop in the journey is a span, with its own span_id.

Our interceptor leverages this context to create a complete record:

import ( "go.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace" "google.golang.org/grpc" ) func (interceptor *Interceptor) clientInterceptor() grpc.UnaryClientInterceptor { return func(ctx context.Context, method string, req, reply interface{}, cc *grpc.ClientConn, invoker grpc.UnaryInvoker, opts ...grpc.CallOption) error { // Extract the span from the context span := trace.SpanFromContext(ctx) if !span.SpanContext().IsSampled() { // If tracing is not enabled for this request, do nothing return invoker(ctx, method, req, reply, cc, opts...) } // Create an interaction record, using IDs from the span context interaction := &rcappb.Interaction{ Metadata: generateMetadata(span.SpanContext(), ...), } interaction.ReqPayload = capturePayload(ctx, req) err := invoker(ctx, method, req, reply, cc, opts...) interaction.RespPayload = capturePayload(ctx, reply) // Asynchronously push the interaction to storage interceptor.pushOrDiscard(ctx, interaction) return err } } // capturePayload convert message to proto used to store all the events func capturePayload(ctx context.Context, msg interface{}) *capturepb.Payload { // Get proto information from msg var prMessage protoreflect.Message ... ... return &capturepb.Payload{ Message: eventInBytes, SchemaName: string(prMessage.Descriptor().FullName()) } }

Of course, capturing every single payload in a high-traffic production environment could be overwhelming. It's critical to include a rate-limiter in the interceptor to sample a configurable percentage of traffic, preventing performance degradation.

Handling Streaming RPCs

Capturing streaming RPCs, like those used for LLM responses or large data transfers, is more complex. A stream can consist of hundreds of individual messages, and we need to capture all of them.

We solve this by creating a wrapper around the standard grpc.ClientStream and grpc.ServerStream. This wrapper intercepts every SendMsg and RecvMsg call, records the message, and then passes it to the original stream.

The process looks like this:

\ When the stream is closed (either by the client or the server), the WrappedStream takes all the recorded request and response messages and persists them as a single interaction.

Storing the Payloads for Posterity

With payloads captured, we need a place to store them. A generic object storage solution like Amazon S3 is a perfect fit—it's durable, scalable, and cost-effective.

The key is a smart file naming strategy. By embedding metadata directly into the object path, we can query for data efficiently without needing a separate database index. Our structure looks like this:

/request-capture-data/{trace_id}/{start_timestamp}_{source_service}_{target_service}_{span_id}.pb

This allows us to instantly find all spans for a given trace_id just by listing files in a directory.

A Note on Security and Privacy

Storing raw request and response data is a superpower, but it comes with great responsibility. If your payloads contain Personally Identifiable Information (PII) or other sensitive data, you must handle it with care.

Before persisting any data, a redaction step is essential. This process should identify sensitive fields—perhaps using proto annotations or field name conventions—and either remove them entirely or mask their values. This ensures that your debugging data remains useful for engineers without exposing sensitive user information.

Making Sense of the Data: Querying and Concatenation

Now that we have a mountain of valuable data, we need a way to access it.

The Query Service and CLI

We built a simple gRPC service that exposes an API for querying the stored payloads from object storage.

// request-capture-service.proto service RequestCapture { // Get all spans for a given trace rpc Traces(TracesRequest) returns (TracesResponse); // Get the full payloads for a trace or a specific span rpc Payloads(PayloadsRequest) returns (PayloadsResponse); }

While the service is useful, the primary interface for developers is a command-line tool. The CLI provides a fast, intuitive way to fetch exactly what you need.

# Get all spans for a given trace ID $ rcap traces --trace-id abc-123 # Get the full request/response payloads for that trace, formatted as JSON $ rcap payloads --trace-id abc-123 --encoding json

The Magic of Stream Concatenation

Analyzing a stream of hundreds of LLM tokens is tedious. To solve this, we introduced the concept of a "concatenator." This is a pluggable component that knows how to merge a stream of messages into a single, coherent message.

For example, our ALLMChatConcatenator takes a stream of chat deltas and merges them by role, producing a final, clean transcript of the conversation. This is configurable, and you can write custom concatenators for any streaming proto in your system. The CLI can then return both the raw stream and the concatenated result, giving you the best of both worlds.

Putting It All Together: From Debugging to Replay

This system isn't just for looking at data; it enables entirely new workflows.

Use Case 1: Advanced Debugging Having the exact, unadulterated payload is a game-changer. You can pipe the CLI's JSON output directly into tools like jq to instantly find a needle in a haystack.

# Find any response where the 'error_code' field was not 0 $ rcap payloads --trace-id abc-123 --encoding json | jq '.payloads[] | select(.resp.error_code != 0)'

Use Case 2: Building a High-Fidelity Traffic Replay System This is perhaps the most powerful use case. The captured payloads are a perfect, high-fidelity record of production traffic. You can build a system to "replay" these payloads against a staging or local instance of a service. This is the most reliable way to reproduce complex bugs that only appear with specific, hard-to-guess data patterns. You can even pipe the output of the rcap tool directly into a gRPC CLI to replay a request with a single command.

Use Case 3: Powering Interactive Debugging UIs While the command line is powerful, the Request Capture Engine's API can also be the backbone for rich, interactive web UIs. Imagine an experimentation UI for your service that directly integrates with the payload store. This unlocks several advanced workflows:

  • Search and Load: A developer can paste a trace_id from a production error into the UI, which then calls the Request Capture Engine service to fetch the exact request payload and load it into an editor.
  • Modify and Replay: The developer can then tweak the request parameters in the UI and replay the request against a development or staging environment to test a fix.
  • A/B Comparison: The UI could load a single production request and replay it against two different versions of a service simultaneously, providing a side-by-side comparison of the responses to validate a change.
  • Shareable Debug Sessions: By integrating with the payload store, a developer can share a URL that links directly to a specific trace, making it easy to collaborate on debugging complex issues.

This turns the payload capture system from a simple debugging tool into a foundational platform for developer tooling.

Conclusion

By combining gRPC interceptors, OpenTelemetry, and a simple object storage layout, we've built a "Request Capture Engine" for our microservices. It has transformed debugging from a frustrating exercise in guesswork into a deterministic process of inspection. The ability to see the exact data that caused a problem, and to replay that data on demand, has dramatically accelerated our ability to build and maintain reliable systems. Building your own payload capture system is an achievable and high-impact investment that will pay dividends in developer productivity and service reliability.

\

Market Opportunity
DeepBook Logo
DeepBook Price(DEEP)
$0.036138
$0.036138$0.036138
+1.68%
USD
DeepBook (DEEP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Exploring how biases in the peer-review system impact researchers' choices, showing how principles of fairness relate to the production of scientific knowledge based on topic importance and hardness.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:15
Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued

Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued

The post Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. American-based rock band Foreigner performs onstage at the Rosemont Horizon, Rosemont, Illinois, November 8, 1981. Pictured are, from left, Mick Jones, on guitar, and vocalist Lou Gramm. (Photo by Paul Natkin/Getty Images) Getty Images Singer Lou Gramm has a vivid memory of recording the ballad “Waiting for a Girl Like You” at New York City’s Electric Lady Studio for his band Foreigner more than 40 years ago. Gramm was adding his vocals for the track in the control room on the other side of the glass when he noticed a beautiful woman walking through the door. “She sits on the sofa in front of the board,” he says. “She looked at me while I was singing. And every now and then, she had a little smile on her face. I’m not sure what that was, but it was driving me crazy. “And at the end of the song, when I’m singing the ad-libs and stuff like that, she gets up,” he continues. “She gives me a little smile and walks out of the room. And when the song ended, I would look up every now and then to see where Mick [Jones] and Mutt [Lange] were, and they were pushing buttons and turning knobs. They were not aware that she was even in the room. So when the song ended, I said, ‘Guys, who was that woman who walked in? She was beautiful.’ And they looked at each other, and they went, ‘What are you talking about? We didn’t see anything.’ But you know what? I think they put her up to it. Doesn’t that sound more like them?” “Waiting for a Girl Like You” became a massive hit in 1981 for Foreigner off their album 4, which peaked at number one on the Billboard chart for 10 weeks and…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:26
Vitalik Buterin Reveals Ethereum’s Bold Plan to Stay Quantum-Secure and Simple!

Vitalik Buterin Reveals Ethereum’s Bold Plan to Stay Quantum-Secure and Simple!

Buterin unveils Ethereum’s strategy to tackle quantum security challenges ahead. Ethereum focuses on simplifying architecture while boosting security for users. Ethereum’s market stability grows as Buterin’s roadmap gains investor confidence. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin has unveiled his long-term vision for the blockchain, focusing on making Ethereum quantum-secure while maintaining its simplicity for users. Buterin presented his roadmap at the Japanese Developer Conference, and splits the future of Ethereum into three phases: short-term, mid-term, and long-term. Buterin’s most ambitious goal for Ethereum is to safeguard the blockchain against the threats posed by quantum computing.  The danger of such future developments is that the future may call into question the cryptographic security of most blockchain systems, and Ethereum will be able to remain ahead thanks to more sophisticated mathematical techniques to ensure the safety and integrity of its protocols. Buterin is committed to ensuring that Ethereum evolves in a way that not only meets today’s security challenges but also prepares for the unknowns of tomorrow. Also Read: Ethereum Giant The Ether Machine Takes Major Step Toward Going Public! However, in spite of such high ambitions, Buterin insisted that Ethereum also needed to simplify its architecture. An important aspect of this vision is to remove unnecessary complexity and make Ethereum more accessible and maintainable without losing its strong security capabilities. Security and simplicity form the core of Buterin’s strategy, as they guarantee that the users of Ethereum experience both security and smooth processes. Focus on Speed and Efficiency in the Short-Term In the short term, Buterin aims to enhance Ethereum’s transaction efficiency, a crucial step toward improving scalability and reducing transaction costs. These advantages are attributed to the fact that, within the mid-term, Ethereum is planning to enhance the speed of transactions in layer-2 networks. According to Butterin, this is part of Ethereum’s expansion, particularly because there is still more need to use blockchain technology to date. The other important aspect of Ethereum’s development is the layer-2 solutions. Buterin supports an approach in which the layer-2 networks are dependent on layer-1 to perform some essential tasks like data security, proof, and censorship resistance. This will enable the layer-2 systems of Ethereum to be concerned with verifying and sequencing transactions, which will improve the overall speed and efficiency of the network. Ethereum’s Market Stability Reflects Confidence in Long-Term Strategy Ethereum’s market performance has remained solid, with the cryptocurrency holding steady above $4,000. Currently priced at $4,492.15, Ethereum has experienced a slight 0.93% increase over the last 24 hours, while its trading volume surged by 8.72%, reaching $34.14 billion. These figures point to growing investor confidence in Ethereum’s long-term vision. The crypto community remains optimistic about Ethereum’s future, with many predicting the price could rise to $5,500 by mid-October. Buterin’s clear, forward-thinking strategy continues to build trust in Ethereum as one of the most secure and scalable blockchain platforms in the market. Also Read: Whales Dump 200 Million XRP in Just 2 Weeks – Is XRP’s Price on the Verge of Collapse? The post Vitalik Buterin Reveals Ethereum’s Bold Plan to Stay Quantum-Secure and Simple! appeared first on 36Crypto.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 01:22