TLDR Spot U.S. altcoin ETFs saw a combined net inflow of $12 million on Monday. Solana ETFs recorded the highest inflows, with over $2.9 million in gains. XRP andTLDR Spot U.S. altcoin ETFs saw a combined net inflow of $12 million on Monday. Solana ETFs recorded the highest inflows, with over $2.9 million in gains. XRP and

Altcoin ETFs Draw $12M Inflows, Contrasting with Bitcoin and Ethereum Outflows

TLDR

  • Spot U.S. altcoin ETFs saw a combined net inflow of $12 million on Monday.
  • Solana ETFs recorded the highest inflows, with over $2.9 million in gains.
  • XRP and Litecoin ETFs experienced modest but positive inflows.
  • Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs continued to see net outflows, marking the seventh consecutive day of withdrawals for Bitcoin.
  • Despite bearish sentiment, retail interest in altcoin ETFs remained strong.

Spot U.S. exchange-traded funds (ETFs) tied to altcoins such as XRP, Solana, and Litecoin recorded a combined daily net inflow of $12 million on Monday. Meanwhile, Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) ETFs saw continued net outflows. The contrasting flow patterns highlight selective demand for altcoin exposure despite broader risk-off conditions in key crypto markets.

XRP ETF Sees Modest Gains Amid Bearish Sentiment

XRP-focused ETFs recorded modest net inflows, adding to the overall $12 million of altcoin ETF gains. Grayscale and 21Shares-backed products were the main drivers of the modest uptick. While the XRP price stood at $1.86, down 2.1% over the last 24 hours, retail sentiment around XRP remained “extremely bearish,” according to data from Stocktwits.

Despite the negative retail outlook, XRP ETFs saw a positive flow, as investors remained interested in the asset. The flow patterns suggest selective demand for altcoins despite overall market pessimism. The altcoin’s performance is under pressure but still attracts investor interest through its ETF products.

Solana ETF Outshines Other Altcoins

Solana (SOL) spot ETFs topped gains, with over $2.9 million in net inflows. Fidelity and VanEck’s Solana-linked ETFs were the primary beneficiaries of this increase. The Solana price was trading at $123, marking a 3% drop in the last 24 hours. On Stocktwits, Solana’s retail sentiment shifted from “bearish” to “extremely bearish,” with chatter decreasing from “normal” to “low” levels.

Despite the decline in Solana’s price, its ETFs experienced significant inflows, signaling investor confidence in the product. The ETF flows highlight the continued demand for altcoin exposure, even amid broader market downturns. This flow pattern underscores Solana’s appeal despite recent price weakness.

Litecoin ETF Gains Despite Bearish Price Action

Litecoin (LTC) spot ETFs also saw an uptick, though more modest, with consistent inflows throughout the day. Litecoin was trading at $78.17, down 1% in the last 24 hours, yet retail sentiment remained “extremely bullish.” According to Stocktwits, Litecoin was the top trending ticker on Monday night, with heightened chatter around the asset.

Despite price volatility, Litecoin’s ETF products saw growing interest. Grayscale and 21Shares-backed Litecoin ETFs were central to these inflows, contributing to the $12 million total for altcoin ETFs. Retail sentiment’s continued bullish stance indicates that some investors remain confident in Litecoin’s prospects, despite recent price declines.

The overall $12 million in inflows into altcoin ETFs provides a sharp contrast to the outflows observed in Bitcoin and Ethereum products. This divergence signals ongoing interest in altcoins, even as more traditional crypto assets face investor withdrawal. The latest data suggests a nuanced investor strategy, favoring altcoin ETFs while reducing exposure to major Bitcoin and Ethereum funds.

The post Altcoin ETFs Draw $12M Inflows, Contrasting with Bitcoin and Ethereum Outflows appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
Union Logo
Union Price(U)
$0.003076
$0.003076$0.003076
+0.03%
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

BitcoinWorld Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security Ever wondered why withdrawing your staked Ethereum (ETH) isn’t an instant process? It’s a question that often sparks debate within the crypto community. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently stepped forward to defend the network’s approximately 45-day ETH unstaking period, asserting its crucial role in safeguarding the network’s integrity. This lengthy waiting time, while sometimes seen as an inconvenience, is a deliberate design choice with profound implications for security. Why is the ETH Unstaking Period a Vital Security Measure? Vitalik Buterin’s defense comes amidst comparisons to other networks, like Solana, which boast significantly shorter unstaking times. He drew a compelling parallel to military operations, explaining that an army cannot function effectively if its soldiers can simply abandon their posts at a moment’s notice. Similarly, a blockchain network requires a stable and committed validator set to maintain its security. The current ETH unstaking period isn’t merely an arbitrary delay. It acts as a critical buffer, providing the network with sufficient time to detect and respond to potential malicious activities. If validators could instantly exit, it would open doors for sophisticated attacks, jeopardizing the entire system. Currently, Ethereum boasts over one million active validators, collectively staking approximately 35.6 million ETH, representing about 30% of the total supply. This massive commitment underpins the network’s robust security model, and the unstaking period helps preserve this stability. Network Security: Ethereum’s Paramount Concern A shorter ETH unstaking period might seem appealing for liquidity, but it introduces significant risks. Imagine a scenario where a large number of validators, potentially colluding, could quickly withdraw their stake after committing a malicious act. Without a substantial delay, the network would have limited time to penalize them or mitigate the damage. This “exit queue” mechanism is designed to prevent sudden validator exodus, which could lead to: Reduced decentralization: A rapid drop in active validators could concentrate power among fewer participants. Increased vulnerability to attacks: A smaller, less stable validator set is easier to compromise. Network instability: Frequent and unpredictable changes in validator numbers can lead to performance issues and consensus failures. Therefore, the extended period is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s a calculated trade-off between immediate liquidity for stakers and the foundational security of the entire Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum vs. Solana: Different Approaches to Unstaking When discussing the ETH unstaking period, many point to networks like Solana, which offers a much quicker two-day unstaking process. While this might seem like an advantage for stakers seeking rapid access to their funds, it reflects fundamental differences in network architecture and security philosophies. Solana’s design prioritizes speed and immediate liquidity, often relying on different consensus mechanisms and validator economics to manage security risks. Ethereum, on the other hand, with its proof-of-stake evolution from proof-of-work, has adopted a more cautious approach to ensure its transition and long-term stability are uncompromised. Each network makes design choices based on its unique goals and threat models. Ethereum’s substantial value and its role as a foundational layer for countless dApps necessitate an extremely robust security posture, making the current unstaking duration a deliberate and necessary component. What Does the ETH Unstaking Period Mean for Stakers? For individuals and institutions staking ETH, understanding the ETH unstaking period is crucial for managing expectations and investment strategies. It means that while staking offers attractive rewards, it also comes with a commitment to the network’s long-term health. Here are key considerations for stakers: Liquidity Planning: Stakers should view their staked ETH as a longer-term commitment, not immediately liquid capital. Risk Management: The delay inherently reduces the ability to react quickly to market volatility with staked assets. Network Contribution: By participating, stakers contribute directly to the security and decentralization of Ethereum, reinforcing its value proposition. While the current waiting period may not be “optimal” in every sense, as Buterin acknowledged, simply shortening it without addressing the underlying security implications would be a dangerous gamble for the network’s reliability. In conclusion, Vitalik Buterin’s defense of the lengthy ETH unstaking period underscores a fundamental principle: network security cannot be compromised for the sake of convenience. It is a vital mechanism that protects Ethereum’s integrity, ensuring its stability and trustworthiness as a leading blockchain platform. This deliberate design choice, while requiring patience from stakers, ultimately fortifies the entire ecosystem against potential threats, paving the way for a more secure and reliable decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the main reason for Ethereum’s long unstaking period? A1: The primary reason is network security. A lengthy ETH unstaking period prevents malicious actors from quickly withdrawing their stake after an attack, giving the network time to detect and penalize them, thus maintaining stability and integrity. Q2: How long is the current ETH unstaking period? A2: The current ETH unstaking period is approximately 45 days. This duration can fluctuate based on network conditions and the number of validators in the exit queue. Q3: How does Ethereum’s unstaking period compare to other blockchains? A3: Ethereum’s unstaking period is notably longer than some other networks, such as Solana, which has a two-day period. This difference reflects varying network architectures and security priorities. Q4: Does the unstaking period affect ETH stakers? A4: Yes, it means stakers need to plan their liquidity carefully, as their staked ETH is not immediately accessible. It encourages a longer-term commitment to the network, aligning staker interests with Ethereum’s stability. Q5: Could the ETH unstaking period be shortened in the future? A5: While Vitalik Buterin acknowledged the current period might not be “optimal,” any significant shortening would likely require extensive research and network upgrades to ensure security isn’t compromised. For now, the focus remains on maintaining robust network defenses. Found this article insightful? Share it with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread awareness about the critical role of the ETH unstaking period in Ethereum’s security! To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum’s institutional adoption. This post Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 15:30
Shiba Inu Price Forecast: Why This New Trending Meme Coin Is Being Dubbed The New PEPE After Record Presale

Shiba Inu Price Forecast: Why This New Trending Meme Coin Is Being Dubbed The New PEPE After Record Presale

While Shiba Inu (SHIB) continues to build its ecosystem and PEPE holds onto its viral roots, a new contender, Layer […] The post Shiba Inu Price Forecast: Why This New Trending Meme Coin Is Being Dubbed The New PEPE After Record Presale appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/18 01:13
The U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board plans to study in 2026 whether crypto assets such as stablecoins can be classified as cash equivalents.

The U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board plans to study in 2026 whether crypto assets such as stablecoins can be classified as cash equivalents.

PANews reported on December 31 that the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) plans to study in 2026 whether certain crypto assets can be classified as cash
Share
PANews2025/12/31 16:50