PANews reported on December 30th that, according to DL News citing Kyunghyang Shinmun, Kim Byung-ki, the floor leader of South Korea's ruling Democratic Party, PANews reported on December 30th that, according to DL News citing Kyunghyang Shinmun, Kim Byung-ki, the floor leader of South Korea's ruling Democratic Party,

A South Korean ruling party lawmaker has been accused of "suppressing Upbit and securing a job at Bithumb for his son."

2025/12/30 10:25
2 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

PANews reported on December 30th that, according to DL News citing Kyunghyang Shinmun, Kim Byung-ki, the floor leader of South Korea's ruling Democratic Party, is accused of pressuring Bithumb's main competitor, Upbit, in the National Assembly after securing an internship for his son at the cryptocurrency exchange Bithumb. His former aide revealed that in February of this year, Kim Byung-ki instructed his team to prepare interrogation materials to "attack" Upbit's operator, Dunamu, on the grounds that it had formed a "monopoly" in the cryptocurrency market.

In September, investigative news outlet NewsTapa reported that Kim Byung-ki's son was hired as an intern at Bithumb's data team after a private meeting with the company in November 2024. Kim himself has repeatedly criticized the "monopoly position of a single exchange" in parliamentary sessions, specifically pointing to 700,000 KYC violations by that exchange. Upbit is projected to hold a 72% market share in South Korea in the first half of 2025. Kim Byung-ki denies the allegations, stating that his comments did not specifically target any company and that his son's employment is unrelated to his legislative activities. This matter has already drawn pressure from the main opposition party and some parties within the ruling coalition to demand his resignation.

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.0003817
$0.0003817$0.0003817
-0.49%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
TRM Labs Launches Revolutionary AI Agent for Natural Language On-Chain Analysis

TRM Labs Launches Revolutionary AI Agent for Natural Language On-Chain Analysis

BitcoinWorld TRM Labs Launches Revolutionary AI Agent for Natural Language On-Chain Analysis San Francisco, March 2025 – Cryptocurrency analytics leader TRM Labs
Share
bitcoinworld2026/03/26 03:00
Unlocking SEO, GEO & AEO: The Future of Search Optimization

Unlocking SEO, GEO & AEO: The Future of Search Optimization

No user will click links while browsing the internet. Instead, they want to see immediate payback. AI-enabled search engines, such as Google AI overview, ChatGPT
Share
Techbullion2026/03/26 02:49