While some analysts see repeating historical structures that could guide future price behavior, others argue that XRP remains primarily driven […] The post XRP While some analysts see repeating historical structures that could guide future price behavior, others argue that XRP remains primarily driven […] The post XRP

XRP Price Outlook: Long-Term Models Hold as Short-Term Pressure Persists

2025/12/29 22:13

While some analysts see repeating historical structures that could guide future price behavior, others argue that XRP remains primarily driven by Bitcoin’s trend and general market liquidity rather than internal supply mechanics.

Key Takeaways

  • XRP’s long-term fractal setup remains intact, but it is still evolving and not fully confirmed.
  • Short-term momentum is weak, with price action showing hesitation rather than a clear trend.
  • Claims of an XRP supply shock are being challenged due to high liquidity on exchanges.
  • Bitcoin’s direction is likely to play a decisive role in XRP’s next major move.

Fractal models point to a potential long-term expansion

A recent update from EGRAG CRYPTO focuses on what the analyst describes as a “White Fractal” forming on higher timeframes. Unlike earlier, more rigid projections, this version is framed as an evolving structure rather than a fixed forecast. The model compares XRP’s current consolidation with a prior accumulation phase that eventually led to a sharp breakout.

According to the analysis, similarities can be observed in how price compressed, how breakouts unfolded, and how XRP interacted with key exponential moving averages. Based on these overlaps, EGRAG estimates that the current alignment between past and present structures is just over 80%, indicating partial confirmation but not full validation.

Price targets and timing remain probabilistic, not guaranteed

If the structure continues to track, the model outlines several upside zones with declining probability as price advances. Initial targets cluster near the $3 area, while higher levels extend into double-digit territory later in the cycle. The proposed window for a broader expansion centers on mid to late 2026.

Crucially, the analyst emphasizes that fractals are not deterministic. Clear invalidation thresholds are highlighted, with sustained moves below key support levels significantly weakening or fully negating the model. The framework is positioned as a tool for monitoring structure, not a promise of outcome.

Short-term charts show muted momentum

While long-term projections attract attention, shorter-term technicals remain less convincing. On daily charts, XRP has spent weeks moving sideways to lower, struggling to generate sustained buying pressure. Momentum indicators such as RSI and MACD continue to hover in neutral-to-weak territory, reflecting indecision rather than trend conviction.

This lack of momentum reinforces the idea that the market is waiting for an external catalyst, rather than responding to internal technical setups alone.

Supply shock narrative faces growing skepticism

Adding to the debate, legal analyst and long-time XRP commentator Bill Morgan has pushed back against claims that XRP is experiencing a supply shock on exchanges. He argues that a large amount of XRP remains readily available for trading and that liquidity conditions can change almost instantly as holders move tokens on or off platforms.

From this perspective, XRP’s order books are highly elastic, capable of thickening or thinning within seconds. As a result, static supply-based explanations are seen as having limited value in explaining short-term price behavior.

READ MORE:

Russia’s Largest Bank Tests Bitcoin as Loan Collateral

Bitcoin remains the dominant driver

Instead of focusing on XRP-specific supply dynamics, Morgan points to Bitcoin as the primary force shaping XRP’s price movements. In his view, capital flows across the crypto market are largely dictated by Bitcoin’s trend, with altcoins reacting accordingly regardless of their individual token mechanics.

This broader-market lens suggests that XRP’s next decisive move may depend less on fractal alignment or exchange balances, and more on whether Bitcoin itself resumes a strong directional trend.

Market waits for confirmation

Taken together, the contrasting viewpoints highlight a familiar tension in crypto analysis. Fractal-based projections offer one roadmap for anticipating future price behavior, while liquidity dynamics and macro correlations offer another. For XRP, the coming months may determine which framework carries more weight, as time itself becomes the final arbiter between structure, skepticism, and market reality.


The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Coindoo.com does not endorse or recommend any specific investment strategy or cryptocurrency. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

The post XRP Price Outlook: Long-Term Models Hold as Short-Term Pressure Persists appeared first on Coindoo.

Market Opportunity
XRP Logo
XRP Price(XRP)
$1.879
$1.879$1.879
+0.07%
USD
XRP (XRP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

BitcoinWorld Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security Ever wondered why withdrawing your staked Ethereum (ETH) isn’t an instant process? It’s a question that often sparks debate within the crypto community. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently stepped forward to defend the network’s approximately 45-day ETH unstaking period, asserting its crucial role in safeguarding the network’s integrity. This lengthy waiting time, while sometimes seen as an inconvenience, is a deliberate design choice with profound implications for security. Why is the ETH Unstaking Period a Vital Security Measure? Vitalik Buterin’s defense comes amidst comparisons to other networks, like Solana, which boast significantly shorter unstaking times. He drew a compelling parallel to military operations, explaining that an army cannot function effectively if its soldiers can simply abandon their posts at a moment’s notice. Similarly, a blockchain network requires a stable and committed validator set to maintain its security. The current ETH unstaking period isn’t merely an arbitrary delay. It acts as a critical buffer, providing the network with sufficient time to detect and respond to potential malicious activities. If validators could instantly exit, it would open doors for sophisticated attacks, jeopardizing the entire system. Currently, Ethereum boasts over one million active validators, collectively staking approximately 35.6 million ETH, representing about 30% of the total supply. This massive commitment underpins the network’s robust security model, and the unstaking period helps preserve this stability. Network Security: Ethereum’s Paramount Concern A shorter ETH unstaking period might seem appealing for liquidity, but it introduces significant risks. Imagine a scenario where a large number of validators, potentially colluding, could quickly withdraw their stake after committing a malicious act. Without a substantial delay, the network would have limited time to penalize them or mitigate the damage. This “exit queue” mechanism is designed to prevent sudden validator exodus, which could lead to: Reduced decentralization: A rapid drop in active validators could concentrate power among fewer participants. Increased vulnerability to attacks: A smaller, less stable validator set is easier to compromise. Network instability: Frequent and unpredictable changes in validator numbers can lead to performance issues and consensus failures. Therefore, the extended period is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s a calculated trade-off between immediate liquidity for stakers and the foundational security of the entire Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum vs. Solana: Different Approaches to Unstaking When discussing the ETH unstaking period, many point to networks like Solana, which offers a much quicker two-day unstaking process. While this might seem like an advantage for stakers seeking rapid access to their funds, it reflects fundamental differences in network architecture and security philosophies. Solana’s design prioritizes speed and immediate liquidity, often relying on different consensus mechanisms and validator economics to manage security risks. Ethereum, on the other hand, with its proof-of-stake evolution from proof-of-work, has adopted a more cautious approach to ensure its transition and long-term stability are uncompromised. Each network makes design choices based on its unique goals and threat models. Ethereum’s substantial value and its role as a foundational layer for countless dApps necessitate an extremely robust security posture, making the current unstaking duration a deliberate and necessary component. What Does the ETH Unstaking Period Mean for Stakers? For individuals and institutions staking ETH, understanding the ETH unstaking period is crucial for managing expectations and investment strategies. It means that while staking offers attractive rewards, it also comes with a commitment to the network’s long-term health. Here are key considerations for stakers: Liquidity Planning: Stakers should view their staked ETH as a longer-term commitment, not immediately liquid capital. Risk Management: The delay inherently reduces the ability to react quickly to market volatility with staked assets. Network Contribution: By participating, stakers contribute directly to the security and decentralization of Ethereum, reinforcing its value proposition. While the current waiting period may not be “optimal” in every sense, as Buterin acknowledged, simply shortening it without addressing the underlying security implications would be a dangerous gamble for the network’s reliability. In conclusion, Vitalik Buterin’s defense of the lengthy ETH unstaking period underscores a fundamental principle: network security cannot be compromised for the sake of convenience. It is a vital mechanism that protects Ethereum’s integrity, ensuring its stability and trustworthiness as a leading blockchain platform. This deliberate design choice, while requiring patience from stakers, ultimately fortifies the entire ecosystem against potential threats, paving the way for a more secure and reliable decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the main reason for Ethereum’s long unstaking period? A1: The primary reason is network security. A lengthy ETH unstaking period prevents malicious actors from quickly withdrawing their stake after an attack, giving the network time to detect and penalize them, thus maintaining stability and integrity. Q2: How long is the current ETH unstaking period? A2: The current ETH unstaking period is approximately 45 days. This duration can fluctuate based on network conditions and the number of validators in the exit queue. Q3: How does Ethereum’s unstaking period compare to other blockchains? A3: Ethereum’s unstaking period is notably longer than some other networks, such as Solana, which has a two-day period. This difference reflects varying network architectures and security priorities. Q4: Does the unstaking period affect ETH stakers? A4: Yes, it means stakers need to plan their liquidity carefully, as their staked ETH is not immediately accessible. It encourages a longer-term commitment to the network, aligning staker interests with Ethereum’s stability. Q5: Could the ETH unstaking period be shortened in the future? A5: While Vitalik Buterin acknowledged the current period might not be “optimal,” any significant shortening would likely require extensive research and network upgrades to ensure security isn’t compromised. For now, the focus remains on maintaining robust network defenses. Found this article insightful? Share it with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread awareness about the critical role of the ETH unstaking period in Ethereum’s security! To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum’s institutional adoption. This post Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 15:30
Shiba Inu Price Forecast: Why This New Trending Meme Coin Is Being Dubbed The New PEPE After Record Presale

Shiba Inu Price Forecast: Why This New Trending Meme Coin Is Being Dubbed The New PEPE After Record Presale

While Shiba Inu (SHIB) continues to build its ecosystem and PEPE holds onto its viral roots, a new contender, Layer […] The post Shiba Inu Price Forecast: Why This New Trending Meme Coin Is Being Dubbed The New PEPE After Record Presale appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/18 01:13
The U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board plans to study in 2026 whether crypto assets such as stablecoins can be classified as cash equivalents.

The U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board plans to study in 2026 whether crypto assets such as stablecoins can be classified as cash equivalents.

PANews reported on December 31 that the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) plans to study in 2026 whether certain crypto assets can be classified as cash
Share
PANews2025/12/31 16:50