The post JPMorgan Freezes Stablecoin Startups Accounts Amid Venezuela Sanctions Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. JPMorgan has frozen accounts of Y The post JPMorgan Freezes Stablecoin Startups Accounts Amid Venezuela Sanctions Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. JPMorgan has frozen accounts of Y

JPMorgan Freezes Stablecoin Startups Accounts Amid Venezuela Sanctions Scrutiny

  • Connection via Checkbook: Both startups linked to JPMorgan through the U.S.-based payments firm Checkbook, but Venezuela ties raised compliance flags.

  • Bank compliance with U.S. sanctions: Activity in Venezuela triggered concerns over sanctions enforcement and know-your-customer rules.

  • Recent U.S. actions: Trump administration intercepted Venezuelan oil tankers and sanctioned six shipping firms, including Myra Marine Limited, under Executive Orders 13850 and 13884.

JPMorgan freezes stablecoin startups accounts over Venezuela sanctions links. Blindpay, Kontigo impacted amid U.S. crackdown on PDVSA oil. Explore banking rules, Trump actions in crypto news. Stay informed on compliance risks.

Why Did JPMorgan Freeze Stablecoin Startups’ Accounts Linked to Venezuela?

JPMorgan froze the accounts of two Y Combinator-backed stablecoin startups, Blindpay and Kontigo, primarily due to their operational links to Venezuela, a country subject to extensive U.S. sanctions. According to reports from The Information, the startups connected to JPMorgan via Checkbook, a U.S.-based payments company, but activity in this high-risk jurisdiction activated the bank’s risk protocols. This action underscores banks’ obligations under U.S. financial regulations to identify and address potential sanctions violations.

How Are U.S. Sanctions on Venezuela Impacting Crypto and Banking?

U.S. sanctions target Venezuela’s state oil company PDVSA, blacklisted since 2019 under Executive Orders 13850 and 13884, to disrupt funding for Nicolás Maduro’s regime. The Treasury Department recently sanctioned six shipping companies—Myra Marine Limited (Marshall Islands), Arctic Voyager Incorporated (Marshall Islands), Poweroy Investment Limited (British Virgin Islands), Ready Great Limited (Marshall Islands), Sino Marine Services Limited (UK-registered), and Full Happy Limited (Marshall Islands)—for facilitating Venezuelan oil shipments using deceptive tactics like falsified location data.

These measures coincide with President Donald Trump’s administration intercepting two Venezuelan oil tankers two weeks ago, with a third under pursuit. Trump stated to reporters, “Maybe we will sell it, maybe we will keep it. Maybe we’ll use it in the strategic reserves. We’re keeping the ships also.” Additionally, fentanyl trafficking through Venezuela was labeled a “weapon of mass destruction” earlier this month, intensifying enforcement. For stablecoin firms, such geopolitical risks amplify scrutiny, as banks must comply with know-your-customer and anti-money laundering rules enforced by regulators like the SEC.

While JPMorgan emphasized this incident is unrelated to stablecoins broadly—a spokesperson noted, “This has nothing to do with stablecoin companies. We bank both stablecoin issuers and stablecoin-related businesses, and we recently took a stablecoin issuer public”—the Venezuela connection proved decisive. Stablecoins, designed for stability in volatile markets, now navigate heightened compliance landscapes as traditional finance intersects with crypto.

Frequently Asked Questions

JPMorgan froze accounts of Blindpay and Kontigo, both backed by Y Combinator. Their ties to Venezuela, routed through Checkbook, violated U.S. sanctions compliance, prompting the bank to sever access despite ongoing business with other stablecoin entities.

What recent actions has the Trump administration taken against Venezuela’s oil trade?

The Trump administration intercepted two Venezuelan oil tankers carrying PDVSA crude and is tracking a third. On December 11, the U.S. Treasury sanctioned six shipping firms for evading sanctions, blocking oil revenues that sustain Maduro’s government while enforcing Executive Orders 13850 and 13884.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. sanctions compliance drives bank actions: JPMorgan’s freeze of Blindpay and Kontigo accounts highlights mandatory risk assessments for Venezuela-linked activities.
  • Stablecoins face indirect geopolitical risks: Even innovative startups must adhere to traditional finance rules, with banks prioritizing sanctions over crypto innovation.
  • Escalating enforcement on oil shipping: Sanctions on six firms and tanker seizures signal intensified U.S. pressure, potentially rippling into global crypto payment networks.

Conclusion

JPMorgan’s decision to freeze stablecoin startups’ accounts linked to Venezuela exemplifies the stringent enforcement of U.S. sanctions on high-risk jurisdictions, intersecting traditional banking with the crypto sector. As actions like tanker interceptions and shipping sanctions under Trump continue, stablecoin firms must prioritize compliance to avoid disruptions. Financial institutions remain committed to regulatory adherence, ensuring stability amid evolving geopolitical tensions—monitor developments for impacts on crypto banking.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/jpmorgan-freezes-stablecoin-startups-accounts-amid-venezuela-sanctions-scrutiny

Market Opportunity
Union Logo
Union Price(U)
$0.002775
$0.002775$0.002775
-5.19%
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

The post Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Onyxcoin price action has entered a tense standoff between bulls
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/14 00:33
Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Daily market key data review and trend analysis, produced by PANews.
Share
PANews2025/04/30 13:50