Willy Woo has weighed in on the threat posed to Bitcoin by quantum computing, posting on X that the OG crypto would likely survive, albeit after a significant andWilly Woo has weighed in on the threat posed to Bitcoin by quantum computing, posting on X that the OG crypto would likely survive, albeit after a significant and

Willy Woo Weighs In as Quantum Hack Fears Target Satoshi’s Bitcoin Stash

2025/12/15 12:50
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com
  • Willy Woo has responded to claims by YouTuber Josh Otten that quantum computers could potentially break Bitcoin’s encryption, allowing hackers to access Satoshi’s wallet and sending the OG crypto as low as US$3.
  • Woo argued that if this were to happen, many people would step in to buy the enormous dip and the network would survive — he also pointed out many wallets wouldn’t be vulnerable to this kind of attack.
  • Fears over quantum computing’s impact on Bitcoin have been growing recently as tech advances begin to accelerate.

What happens if/when someone builds a powerful quantum computer capable of hacking Satoshi Nakamoto’s Bitcoin wallet holding almost 1.1 million BTC? The issue was debated on X last week after YouTuber Josh Otten argued that such a situation could see Bitcoin’s price fall to as low as US$3 (AU$4.50).

Otten said he believes a powerful quantum computer capable of breaking Bitcoin’s private keys could trigger such a collapse.

“If a functional Quantum Computer is built, it could use Shor’s algorithm to crack the encryption guarding Bitcoin’s earliest wallets,” Otten claimed. 

This would expose the private keys to Satoshi Nakamoto’s fortune, likely crashing the market and destroying trust in the whole system.

Josh Otten, ‘Ordinary Things’ YouTube Channel

However, Bitcoin influencer Willy Woo doubted even this catastrophic scenario could destroy Bitcoin permanently. “Many OGs would be in to buy the flash crash,” Woo wrote.

BTC network would survive, most coins are not immediately vulnerable.

Willy Woo, Bitcoin analyst

While not all Bitcoin wallets would be vulnerable to precisely this kind of quantum computing attack, around 4 million early wallets, including Satoshi’s, would be. These early wallets, known as pay-to-public-key (P2PK), reveal the wallet’s full public key each time a payment is made. 

Using a quantum computer, a wallet’s private key could theoretically be determined from its public key. Once an attacker has a wallet’s private key, they would be able to sign transactions on the wallet and steal all the Bitcoin.

Woo said that while this scenario wouldn’t necessarily spell the end for Bitcoin, it would result in a “many year shakeout.”

More recent Bitcoin wallets aren’t as vulnerable to this kind of attack because they don’t expose their full public keys each time they send a transaction — if a quantum attacker doesn’t know a public key, they can’t determine the associated private key.

Related: Is there Meat in the Quantum-Crypto Collision?

Q-Day Imminent? Early Bitcoin Dev Not Convinced of Quantum Threat

As advances are made in quantum computing, fears are growing in the crypto community that the encryption many networks rely on could soon be broken, essentially rendering them useless. 

So-called ‘Q-Day’ — the day that quantum computers become capable of cracking current encryption algorithms — had long been considered a distant concern, but rapid progress by firms such as Rigetti and Quantinuum has some saying the time line may have shrunk to as little as just 2-3 years.

Solana’s co-founder, Anatoly Yakovenko, put the chances of Q-Day occurring in the next 5 years at 50% in comments he made earlier this year.

Related: Bitcoin Won’t Face Quantum Threat for Decades, Says Adam Back

Not everyone is convinced that quantum computers pose a huge, short-term threat to crypto. Adam Back, the early Bitcoin developer and founder of Bitcoin adjacent firm Blockstream, believes any threat posed to Bitcoin by quantum computing remains decades away.

In a comment on X from November, Back explained he thinks the threat won’t be serious for at least 20 to 40 years. He also believes the Bitcoin network will be able to be strengthened against this threat well before it poses anything like an existential risk to the network.

“There are quantum secure signatures, NIST standardized SLH-DSA last year,” Back said. “Bitcoin can add over time, as the evaluation continues and be quantum ready, long before cryptographically relevant quantum computers arrive.”

The post Willy Woo Weighs In as Quantum Hack Fears Target Satoshi’s Bitcoin Stash appeared first on Crypto News Australia.

Market Opportunity
Wootrade Network Logo
Wootrade Network Price(WOO)
$0.01604
$0.01604$0.01604
-2.61%
USD
Wootrade Network (WOO) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

USDH Power Struggle Ignites Stablecoin “Bidding Wars” Across DeFi: Bloomberg

USDH Power Struggle Ignites Stablecoin “Bidding Wars” Across DeFi: Bloomberg

A heated contest for control over a new dollar-pegged token has set the stage for what analysts say could define the next phase of the stablecoin industry. According to Bloomberg, a bidding war unfolded on Hyperliquid, one of crypto’s fastest-growing trading platforms, with the prize being the right to issue USDH, its native stablecoin. The competition drew some of the sector’s most prominent names, including Paxos, Sky, and Ethena, who later withdrew their bid, alongside the lesser-known Native Markets, a startup backed by Stripe stablecoin subsidiary Bridge. Hyperliquid Stablecoin Race Shows Branding and Partnerships Matter as Much as Tech Over the weekend, Hyperliquid’s validators, the contributors who secure the network and vote on key decisions, awarded the USDH contract to Native Markets over the weekend. Despite its relatively new status, the firm’s connection with Stripe helped it outpace more established rivals. Stablecoins underpin decentralized finance by providing a dollar-backed medium for collateral, settlement, and payments across applications. What began as a grassroots, community-led sector has evolved into a battleground for institutions and payment companies seeking revenue from interest on reserves. Circle, for example, shares proceeds from its USDC with Coinbase under a partnership designed to stabilize earnings during market swings. The Hyperliquid contest offered a rare glimpse into just how intense competition has become. Paxos pledged to take no revenue until USDH surpassed $1 billion in circulation. Agora offered to share 100% of net revenue with Hyperliquid, while Ethena put forward 95%. All were outbid by Native Markets, whose ties to Stripe’s $1.1 billion acquisition of Bridge and subsequent rollout of the Tempo blockchain positioned it as a strong contender. “Every stablecoin issuer is extremely desperate for supply,” said Zaheer Ebtikar, co-founder of Split Capital. “They are willing to publicly announce how much they are willing to offer. It just shows it’s a very tough business for stablecoin issuers.” While USDC remains dominant on Hyperliquid with more than $5.6 billion in deposits, the arrival of USDH could shift flows and revenue dynamics. Paxos co-founder Bhau Kotecha said the firm sees the exchange’s growth as an important opportunity, while Agora’s co-founder Nick van Eck warned that awarding the contract to a vertically integrated issuer risked undermining decentralization. Regulatory positioning also factored into the debate. Paxos operates under a New York trust charter and is seeking a federal license, while Bridge holds money transmitter approvals in 30 states. Native Markets, in a blog post, cited regulatory flexibility and deployment speed as reasons for its selection. Hyperliquid said the strong engagement from its community validated the process. Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire dismissed concerns over USDC’s status, noting on X that competition benefits the ecosystem. Analysts suggested that fears of centralization may be exaggerated, noting that Hyperliquid is likely to remain neutral and support multiple stablecoins. Still, the contest over USDH highlighted a new reality for stablecoins: branding, partnerships, and business strategy are becoming as decisive as technology. Native Markets Secures USDH Stablecoin Mandate on Hyperliquid Hyperliquid has concluded its governance vote for the USDH stablecoin, awarding the mandate to Native Markets after a closely watched process that drew weeks of community debate and rival proposals. USDH, described by Hyperliquid as a “Hyperliquid-first, compliant, and natively minted” dollar-backed token, is intended to reduce the platform’s dependence on USDC and strengthen its spot markets. Validators on the decentralized exchange voted in favor of Native Markets, a relatively new player backed by Stripe’s Bridge subsidiary, over established contenders including Paxos and Ethena. The outcome followed a string of proposals offering aggressive revenue-sharing terms to win validator support, underscoring the scale of incentives attached to controlling USDH. Hyperliquid’s exchange has become a critical hub for stablecoin liquidity, with $5.7 billion in USDC, around 8% of its total supply, currently held on the network. At prevailing treasury yields, that translates to an estimated $200 million to $220 million in annual revenue for Circle, underlining why a native alternative could be transformative. Hyperliquid’s validators, who secure the network and vote on key decisions, selected Native Markets following an on-chain governance process that concluded September 15. Native Markets has laid out a phased rollout for USDH, beginning with capped minting and redemption trials before expanding into spot markets. Its reserves will be managed in cash and treasuries by BlackRock, with on-chain tokenization through Superstate and Bridge. Yield from those reserves will be split between Hyperliquid’s Assistance Fund and ecosystem development. The launch of USDH comes as Hyperliquid records record profits from perpetual futures trading, with $106 million in revenue in August alone, and prepares to slash spot trading fees by 80% to bolster liquidity. Analysts say the move positions Hyperliquid to capture more of the stablecoin economics internally, marking a significant step in its bid to rival the largest players in decentralized finance
Share
CryptoNews2025/09/18 00:48
Bitcoin Market Faces Renewed Pressure: What Lies Ahead?

Bitcoin Market Faces Renewed Pressure: What Lies Ahead?

The post Bitcoin Market Faces Renewed Pressure: What Lies Ahead? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Recent data reveals heightened instability in the cryptocurrency
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/31 01:21
BTC fell below $67,000, down 0.94% on the day.

BTC fell below $67,000, down 0.94% on the day.

PANews reported on March 31 that, according to OKX market data, BTC has just fallen below $67,000 and is currently trading at $66,989.20 per coin, down 0.94% on
Share
PANews2026/03/31 01:22