Unprogrammed appropriation has been used to fund flood control and other infrastructure projects under the Marcos administrationUnprogrammed appropriation has been used to fund flood control and other infrastructure projects under the Marcos administration

How much unprogrammed appropriations in 2026 budget?

2025/12/15 11:27
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

MANILA, Philippines – The Department of Budget and Management (DBM) initially allotted P249.9 billion for unprogrammed appropriations (UA) in the proposed 2026 national budget.

But amid the flood control and budget corruption scandal, lawmakers in both chambers of Congress trimmed this allocation.

The Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism has reported that billions of pesos worth of flood control and infrastructure projects under the Marcos administration were funded via UA.

So, how is Congress crafting the UA for 2026?

House version

In the House-approved General Appropriations Bill (GAB), lawmakers proposed P243 billion in UA. This is P6.766 billion (2.61%) lower than the P249.9 billion in the 2026 National Expenditure Program (NEP).

This reduction came mainly from the House’s decision to remove the P6.766-billion UA for Public Health Emergency Benefits and Allowances for Health Care and Non-Health Care Workers.

The House also realigned funds within the UA. It slashed P35.77 billion from the Strengthening Assistance for Government Infrastructure and Social Programs (SAGIP) to finance the counterpart funding for foreign-assisted projects. This line item was not in the NEP’s UA.

Despite these cuts, concerns over UA persisted. At least 12 lawmakers manifested their dissent during the passage of the 2026 House GAB.

Senate version

The Senate went further, cutting the UA to P174.56 billion or P68.77 billion (28.23%) lower than the House version.

Senators removed House-approved unprogrammed allocations for the following items:

  • SAGIP
  • Program on Risk Management
  • Refund of the Service Development Fee for the Right to Develop the Nampeidai Property in Tokyo, Japan
  • Marawi Siege Victims Compensation Program
  • Comprehensive and Adequate Insurance Protection for Strategically Important Government Assets and Interests

The Senate also reduced the UA for the Revised AFP Modernization Program from P50 billion in the House version to P30 billion.

Notably, senators inserted a P250-million allocation for the Revitalizing the Automotive Industry for Competitiveness Enhancement (RACE) program, an item absent from both the NEP and the House’s unprogrammed appropriations.

They also increased the UA for Fiscal Support Arrearages under the Comprehensive Automotive Resurgence Strategy (CARS) program, from P333.5 million in the House version to P4.32 billion.

Unprogrammed appropriations are standby funds sourced from new or excess government revenues and foreign loans.

The DBM says that the concept of unprogrammed funds was introduced over four decades ago and retained by succeeding administrations. These funds can be tapped during calamities and other “activities we do not even anticipate.”

Opposition lawmakers have called it “standby pork,” with Liberal Party members questioning its constitutionality before the Supreme Court in 2024.

When the Marcos administration started, UA skyrocketed. In the first approved budget under Marcos in 2023, it was P807.16 billion, over three times more than the P251.64 billion in 2022. In 2024, it was P731.4 billion, and in 2025, it was P531.7 billion.

How much unprogrammed appropriations will remain in the final version of the 2026 national budget? And will it be free from corruption?

Bookmark Rappler’s #BudgetWatch page for stories tracking how the government allocates and spends the public’s money. – with reports from Dwight de Leon/Rappler.com

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

USDH Power Struggle Ignites Stablecoin “Bidding Wars” Across DeFi: Bloomberg

USDH Power Struggle Ignites Stablecoin “Bidding Wars” Across DeFi: Bloomberg

A heated contest for control over a new dollar-pegged token has set the stage for what analysts say could define the next phase of the stablecoin industry. According to Bloomberg, a bidding war unfolded on Hyperliquid, one of crypto’s fastest-growing trading platforms, with the prize being the right to issue USDH, its native stablecoin. The competition drew some of the sector’s most prominent names, including Paxos, Sky, and Ethena, who later withdrew their bid, alongside the lesser-known Native Markets, a startup backed by Stripe stablecoin subsidiary Bridge. Hyperliquid Stablecoin Race Shows Branding and Partnerships Matter as Much as Tech Over the weekend, Hyperliquid’s validators, the contributors who secure the network and vote on key decisions, awarded the USDH contract to Native Markets over the weekend. Despite its relatively new status, the firm’s connection with Stripe helped it outpace more established rivals. Stablecoins underpin decentralized finance by providing a dollar-backed medium for collateral, settlement, and payments across applications. What began as a grassroots, community-led sector has evolved into a battleground for institutions and payment companies seeking revenue from interest on reserves. Circle, for example, shares proceeds from its USDC with Coinbase under a partnership designed to stabilize earnings during market swings. The Hyperliquid contest offered a rare glimpse into just how intense competition has become. Paxos pledged to take no revenue until USDH surpassed $1 billion in circulation. Agora offered to share 100% of net revenue with Hyperliquid, while Ethena put forward 95%. All were outbid by Native Markets, whose ties to Stripe’s $1.1 billion acquisition of Bridge and subsequent rollout of the Tempo blockchain positioned it as a strong contender. “Every stablecoin issuer is extremely desperate for supply,” said Zaheer Ebtikar, co-founder of Split Capital. “They are willing to publicly announce how much they are willing to offer. It just shows it’s a very tough business for stablecoin issuers.” While USDC remains dominant on Hyperliquid with more than $5.6 billion in deposits, the arrival of USDH could shift flows and revenue dynamics. Paxos co-founder Bhau Kotecha said the firm sees the exchange’s growth as an important opportunity, while Agora’s co-founder Nick van Eck warned that awarding the contract to a vertically integrated issuer risked undermining decentralization. Regulatory positioning also factored into the debate. Paxos operates under a New York trust charter and is seeking a federal license, while Bridge holds money transmitter approvals in 30 states. Native Markets, in a blog post, cited regulatory flexibility and deployment speed as reasons for its selection. Hyperliquid said the strong engagement from its community validated the process. Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire dismissed concerns over USDC’s status, noting on X that competition benefits the ecosystem. Analysts suggested that fears of centralization may be exaggerated, noting that Hyperliquid is likely to remain neutral and support multiple stablecoins. Still, the contest over USDH highlighted a new reality for stablecoins: branding, partnerships, and business strategy are becoming as decisive as technology. Native Markets Secures USDH Stablecoin Mandate on Hyperliquid Hyperliquid has concluded its governance vote for the USDH stablecoin, awarding the mandate to Native Markets after a closely watched process that drew weeks of community debate and rival proposals. USDH, described by Hyperliquid as a “Hyperliquid-first, compliant, and natively minted” dollar-backed token, is intended to reduce the platform’s dependence on USDC and strengthen its spot markets. Validators on the decentralized exchange voted in favor of Native Markets, a relatively new player backed by Stripe’s Bridge subsidiary, over established contenders including Paxos and Ethena. The outcome followed a string of proposals offering aggressive revenue-sharing terms to win validator support, underscoring the scale of incentives attached to controlling USDH. Hyperliquid’s exchange has become a critical hub for stablecoin liquidity, with $5.7 billion in USDC, around 8% of its total supply, currently held on the network. At prevailing treasury yields, that translates to an estimated $200 million to $220 million in annual revenue for Circle, underlining why a native alternative could be transformative. Hyperliquid’s validators, who secure the network and vote on key decisions, selected Native Markets following an on-chain governance process that concluded September 15. Native Markets has laid out a phased rollout for USDH, beginning with capped minting and redemption trials before expanding into spot markets. Its reserves will be managed in cash and treasuries by BlackRock, with on-chain tokenization through Superstate and Bridge. Yield from those reserves will be split between Hyperliquid’s Assistance Fund and ecosystem development. The launch of USDH comes as Hyperliquid records record profits from perpetual futures trading, with $106 million in revenue in August alone, and prepares to slash spot trading fees by 80% to bolster liquidity. Analysts say the move positions Hyperliquid to capture more of the stablecoin economics internally, marking a significant step in its bid to rival the largest players in decentralized finance
Share
CryptoNews2025/09/18 00:48
Bitcoin Market Faces Renewed Pressure: What Lies Ahead?

Bitcoin Market Faces Renewed Pressure: What Lies Ahead?

The post Bitcoin Market Faces Renewed Pressure: What Lies Ahead? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Recent data reveals heightened instability in the cryptocurrency
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/31 01:21
BTC fell below $67,000, down 0.94% on the day.

BTC fell below $67,000, down 0.94% on the day.

PANews reported on March 31 that, according to OKX market data, BTC has just fallen below $67,000 and is currently trading at $66,989.20 per coin, down 0.94% on
Share
PANews2026/03/31 01:22