SEC Chair Paul Atkins: Most Crypto ICOs Are Outside SEC’s Jurisdiction

TLDR

• SEC Chair Paul Atkins stated that many types of crypto ICOs should not be regulated by the SEC.
• Atkins emphasized that network tokens, digital collectibles, and digital tools should not be considered securities.
• The SEC will only regulate tokenized securities, which are representations of existing securities on the blockchain.
• ICOs related to network tokens and digital collectibles will fall under the CFTC’s jurisdiction, not the SEC’s.
• Atkins’ comments suggest a shift in the regulatory approach, potentially boosting the ICO market.

SEC Chair Paul Atkins announced on Tuesday that many crypto ICOs (Initial Coin Offerings) should not be considered securities transactions. This statement came during his address at the Blockchain Association’s annual policy summit. According to Atkins, these ICOs fall outside the SEC’s jurisdiction and should not be regulated by the agency.

Atkins explained that his stance is based on a token taxonomy he introduced last month. The SEC Chair clarified that ICOs tied to network tokens, digital collectibles, and digital tools should be exempt from SEC regulation. He said that these types of ICOs would not meet the legal definition of a security.

SEC’s New Token Taxonomy Excludes Many ICOs

Atkins’ token taxonomy aims to categorize different types of digital tokens. He emphasized that network tokens, digital collectibles, and digital tools should be outside the SEC’s purview. “These sorts of things would not fall into the definition of a security,” Atkins stated.

The SEC Chair further explained that these three categories of tokens do not represent securities under current regulations. As a result, ICOs based on these tokens should not fall under SEC jurisdiction. Instead, Atkins indicated that other regulators, like the CFTC, would oversee such ICOs.

Atkins’ remarks signal a shift in the way the SEC views crypto ICOs. This new approach could pave the way for more ICOs to proceed without facing SEC oversight. Companies launching ICOs in these categories would no longer have to worry about SEC enforcement.

While Atkins excluded many crypto ICOs from SEC oversight, he made it clear that tokenized securities are an exception. Tokenized securities represent traditional securities, such as stocks or bonds, but are traded on blockchain networks. These types of ICOs, according to Atkins, should remain under SEC regulation.

Atkins noted that tokenized securities already meet the legal definition of securities. Therefore, ICOs based on tokenized securities would still require registration with the SEC. This ensures that these ICOs comply with the same regulations that apply to traditional securities.

He also mentioned that the SEC’s role would remain limited to tokenized securities and not extend to other types of ICOs. The SEC Chair’s comments imply that crypto companies involved in ICOs outside of tokenized securities will face less regulatory pressure. This could encourage more innovation within the crypto space.

Paul Atkins’ Remarks Could Revive ICO Activity

Atkins’ comments suggest that ICOs could see a resurgence in popularity. In 2017, ICOs experienced a boom, but many were halted due to SEC enforcement actions. The SEC cracked down on ICOs, deeming many of them as unregistered securities offerings.

However, Atkins’ new approach could help revitalize the ICO market. With fewer ICOs falling under SEC scrutiny, more companies could consider launching token offerings. This shift in policy may lead to a wave of new ICOs, particularly those involving network tokens, digital collectibles, and digital tools.

The SEC’s relaxed stance could also spark innovation within the crypto space. Companies may feel more confident launching ICOs without worrying about strict SEC regulation. This could lead to a wave of new token offerings that were previously deterred by regulatory uncertainty.

Atkins pointed out that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) would take over the regulation of many non-security ICOs. He specifically mentioned that ICOs based on certain token categories should fall under the CFTC’s jurisdiction. This division of regulatory oversight would allow the SEC to focus on tokenized securities while the CFTC handles the rest.

While the SEC’s focus would be on tokenized securities, the CFTC would regulate many other types of crypto-related projects. The CFTC’s more relaxed approach could encourage more innovation in the crypto sector, particularly for ICOs not involving traditional securities.

The change in regulatory oversight may bring more clarity and structure to the crypto market. With more defined roles for the SEC and CFTC, companies launching ICOs can better navigate the regulatory landscape.

Coinbase’s New ICO Platform Reflects Changing Landscape

Coinbase recently launched a new platform for launching ICOs, which could benefit from Atkins’ regulatory changes. The platform, acquired from crypto fundraising company Echo, allows companies to launch ICOs and sell tokens to U.S. retail investors. With the SEC’s reduced oversight, companies using Coinbase’s platform may face fewer hurdles in the ICO process.

This move indicates that industry leaders are already preparing for a potential revival of ICO activity. By acquiring Echo, Coinbase is positioning itself as a major player in the ICO space. This platform may attract more companies interested in launching tokens without the threat of SEC enforcement.

The post SEC Chair Paul Atkins: Most Crypto ICOs Are Outside SEC’s Jurisdiction appeared first on Blockonomi.