The post Solana (SOL) Ecosystem in Turmoil: Two Protocols Collide, Solana Foundation Issues Statement appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Discussions on the Jupiter Lend vault design, one of the most talked-about topics in the Solana ecosystem, escalated further over the weekend. Kash Dhanda, Jupiter Exchange’s chief operating officer, released a video statement addressing community concerns regarding the protocol’s lending product, acknowledging that claims of “zero risk of contagion” circulating on social media are “not 100% accurate.” Dhanda noted that some previous posts had portrayed Jupiter Lend’s vaults as “isolated risk,” with one post even stating that “cross-contamination is completely eliminated.” This post was subsequently deleted by the Jupiter team due to backlash. Dhanda said in his statement: “The post we described as having zero risk of infection was completely inaccurate. We wanted to delete it to prevent further spread, but in hindsight, we should have issued a correction at that time.” The controversy was sparked by Fluid co-founder Samyak Jain’s announcement that Jupiter Lend uses rehypothecation for capital efficiency. This means collateral users deposit into vaults can be reused elsewhere within the protocol, meaning the collateral isn’t completely isolated. According to Jain, Jupiter Lend vaults can still be considered “isolated” because each vault has its own configuration, limit, liquidation threshold, and penalty rate. However, this structure does not prevent collateral reuse due to the shared liquidity layer. Dhanda also confirmed the use of rehypothecation, saying, “This mechanism is why these collateral generates returns.” However, Dhanda argued that the vaults are still “internally isolated.” Marius Ciubotariu, co-founder of rival Solana lending protocol Kamino, publicly criticized Jupiter Lend’s design. Kamino recently blocked Jupiter’s financial instrument from accessing Kamino positions. Ciubotariu argued that funds from a user who had pledged SOL collateral were being sent to loop trades and other risky positions, writing: “There’s no isolation here, just complete cross-contamination. Contrary to what’s advertised.” As the debate escalated, Solana Foundation President Lily… The post Solana (SOL) Ecosystem in Turmoil: Two Protocols Collide, Solana Foundation Issues Statement appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Discussions on the Jupiter Lend vault design, one of the most talked-about topics in the Solana ecosystem, escalated further over the weekend. Kash Dhanda, Jupiter Exchange’s chief operating officer, released a video statement addressing community concerns regarding the protocol’s lending product, acknowledging that claims of “zero risk of contagion” circulating on social media are “not 100% accurate.” Dhanda noted that some previous posts had portrayed Jupiter Lend’s vaults as “isolated risk,” with one post even stating that “cross-contamination is completely eliminated.” This post was subsequently deleted by the Jupiter team due to backlash. Dhanda said in his statement: “The post we described as having zero risk of infection was completely inaccurate. We wanted to delete it to prevent further spread, but in hindsight, we should have issued a correction at that time.” The controversy was sparked by Fluid co-founder Samyak Jain’s announcement that Jupiter Lend uses rehypothecation for capital efficiency. This means collateral users deposit into vaults can be reused elsewhere within the protocol, meaning the collateral isn’t completely isolated. According to Jain, Jupiter Lend vaults can still be considered “isolated” because each vault has its own configuration, limit, liquidation threshold, and penalty rate. However, this structure does not prevent collateral reuse due to the shared liquidity layer. Dhanda also confirmed the use of rehypothecation, saying, “This mechanism is why these collateral generates returns.” However, Dhanda argued that the vaults are still “internally isolated.” Marius Ciubotariu, co-founder of rival Solana lending protocol Kamino, publicly criticized Jupiter Lend’s design. Kamino recently blocked Jupiter’s financial instrument from accessing Kamino positions. Ciubotariu argued that funds from a user who had pledged SOL collateral were being sent to loop trades and other risky positions, writing: “There’s no isolation here, just complete cross-contamination. Contrary to what’s advertised.” As the debate escalated, Solana Foundation President Lily…

Solana (SOL) Ecosystem in Turmoil: Two Protocols Collide, Solana Foundation Issues Statement

2025/12/08 02:26

Discussions on the Jupiter Lend vault design, one of the most talked-about topics in the Solana ecosystem, escalated further over the weekend.

Kash Dhanda, Jupiter Exchange’s chief operating officer, released a video statement addressing community concerns regarding the protocol’s lending product, acknowledging that claims of “zero risk of contagion” circulating on social media are “not 100% accurate.”

Dhanda noted that some previous posts had portrayed Jupiter Lend’s vaults as “isolated risk,” with one post even stating that “cross-contamination is completely eliminated.” This post was subsequently deleted by the Jupiter team due to backlash.

Dhanda said in his statement:

The controversy was sparked by Fluid co-founder Samyak Jain’s announcement that Jupiter Lend uses rehypothecation for capital efficiency. This means collateral users deposit into vaults can be reused elsewhere within the protocol, meaning the collateral isn’t completely isolated.

According to Jain, Jupiter Lend vaults can still be considered “isolated” because each vault has its own configuration, limit, liquidation threshold, and penalty rate. However, this structure does not prevent collateral reuse due to the shared liquidity layer.

Dhanda also confirmed the use of rehypothecation, saying, “This mechanism is why these collateral generates returns.” However, Dhanda argued that the vaults are still “internally isolated.”

Marius Ciubotariu, co-founder of rival Solana lending protocol Kamino, publicly criticized Jupiter Lend’s design. Kamino recently blocked Jupiter’s financial instrument from accessing Kamino positions.

Ciubotariu argued that funds from a user who had pledged SOL collateral were being sent to loop trades and other risky positions, writing:

As the debate escalated, Solana Foundation President Lily Liu called on both sides on social media. Liu demanded that Kamino and Jupiter Lend stop targeting each other. Liu noted that the Solana lending market is approximately $5 billion, while Ethereum has a volume 10 times that, and the traditional financial collateral market is much larger.

Liu used the following expressions in his message:

*This is not investment advice.

Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!

Source: https://en.bitcoinsistemi.com/solana-sol-ecosystem-in-turmoil-two-protocols-collide-solana-foundation-issues-statement/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Mutuum Finance (MUTM) Holder Count Explodes as Phase 6 Nears 100% Allocation Ahead of Q1 Protocol Launch, Best Crypto to Buy?

Mutuum Finance (MUTM) Holder Count Explodes as Phase 6 Nears 100% Allocation Ahead of Q1 Protocol Launch, Best Crypto to Buy?

The post Mutuum Finance (MUTM) Holder Count Explodes as Phase 6 Nears 100% Allocation Ahead of Q1 Protocol Launch, Best Crypto to Buy? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Mutuum Finance is gaining attention among investors, particularly given the fact that the project is witnessing an extremely high number of new holders as the project is fast entering the last stage of Phase 6 of the presale, which is soon to attain 100% sales. Mutuum Finance (MUTM) is currently the best crypto to buy. MUTM is primed and ready to capitalize on the extremely awaited V1 protocol launch, towards the end of Q4, which expresses the project’s attention towards the implementation of usability. With the extremely low price, which is merely $0.035 today, the project continues to see increased attention. Having attained more than $19.18 million in presale and having garnered more than 18,350 supporters, Mutuum Finance is currently the best crypto among new buyers. Boosting the Presale Process with More Investors Entering Phase 6 Mutuum Finance is among the most-watched blockchain initiatives on the eve of the new year, 2026. The ongoing presale is attracting a lot of attention, and so far, it has gained more than 18,350 members and has exceeded the $19.18 million mark. The cost of buying tokens in phase 6 is $0.035, before phase 7, which is set to raise prices by nearly 20% to $0.04. The project has gained so much traction because it focuses on financial applications and utilization, rather than creating hype. This is what has made MUTM so attractive to financial investors, who look at utility focus when searching for new investments and looking to buy the best crypto. Ready to Go Live on Sepolia Testnet Mutuum Finance is preparing to launch the V1 protocol on the Sepolia testnet, which will take place during Q4 2025. This is a long-awaited moment, marking an essential milestone regarding the technical part of the project. When it happens, the most basic components of…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/08 15:54
Whales Dump 200 Million XRP in Just 2 Weeks – Is XRP’s Price on the Verge of Collapse?

Whales Dump 200 Million XRP in Just 2 Weeks – Is XRP’s Price on the Verge of Collapse?

Whales offload 200 million XRP leaving market uncertainty behind. XRP faces potential collapse as whales drive major price shifts. Is XRP’s future in danger after massive sell-off by whales? XRP’s price has been under intense pressure recently as whales reportedly offloaded a staggering 200 million XRP over the past two weeks. This massive sell-off has raised alarms across the cryptocurrency community, as many wonder if the market is on the brink of collapse or just undergoing a temporary correction. According to crypto analyst Ali (@ali_charts), this surge in whale activity correlates directly with the price fluctuations seen in the past few weeks. XRP experienced a sharp spike in late July and early August, but the price quickly reversed as whales began to sell their holdings in large quantities. The increased volume during this period highlights the intensity of the sell-off, leaving many traders to question the future of XRP’s value. Whales have offloaded around 200 million $XRP in the last two weeks! pic.twitter.com/MiSQPpDwZM — Ali (@ali_charts) September 17, 2025 Also Read: Shiba Inu’s Price Is at a Tipping Point: Will It Break or Crash Soon? Can XRP Recover or Is a Bigger Decline Ahead? As the market absorbs the effects of the whale offload, technical indicators suggest that XRP may be facing a period of consolidation. The Relative Strength Index (RSI), currently sitting at 53.05, signals a neutral market stance, indicating that XRP could move in either direction. This leaves traders uncertain whether the XRP will break above its current resistance levels or continue to fall as more whales sell off their holdings. Source: Tradingview Additionally, the Bollinger Bands, suggest that XRP is nearing the upper limits of its range. This often points to a potential slowdown or pullback in price, further raising concerns about the future direction of the XRP. With the price currently around $3.02, many are questioning whether XRP can regain its footing or if it will continue to decline. The Aftermath of Whale Activity: Is XRP’s Future in Danger? Despite the large sell-off, XRP is not yet showing signs of total collapse. However, the market remains fragile, and the price is likely to remain volatile in the coming days. With whales continuing to influence price movements, many investors are watching closely to see if this trend will reverse or intensify. The coming weeks will be critical for determining whether XRP can stabilize or face further declines. The combination of whale offloading and technical indicators suggest that XRP’s price is at a crossroads. Traders and investors alike are waiting for clear signals to determine if the XRP will bounce back or continue its downward trajectory. Also Read: Metaplanet’s Bold Move: $15M U.S. Subsidiary to Supercharge Bitcoin Strategy The post Whales Dump 200 Million XRP in Just 2 Weeks – Is XRP’s Price on the Verge of Collapse? appeared first on 36Crypto.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/17 23:42