PROTEST ORGANIZERS should turn the multibillion-peso flood control scandal into a central campaign issue for the 2028 elections, political analysts said, arguing that an early push could help shape voter sentiment and boost anti-corruption candidates.PROTEST ORGANIZERS should turn the multibillion-peso flood control scandal into a central campaign issue for the 2028 elections, political analysts said, arguing that an early push could help shape voter sentiment and boost anti-corruption candidates.

Activists should make flood scandal a 2028 election issue, analysts say

2025/12/07 20:39

By Kenneth Christiane L. Basilio, Reporter

PROTEST ORGANIZERS should turn the multibillion-peso flood control scandal into a central campaign issue for the 2028 elections, political analysts said, arguing that an early push could help shape voter sentiment and boost anti-corruption candidates.

They also said organizers should start “blacklisting” politicians linked to the controversy to weaken support for officials tainted by the scheme.

“The issue is existential and must pivot towards 2028,” Hansley A. Juliano, a political science lecturer at Ateneo de Manila University, said in a Facebook Messenger chat. “If genuine and organic leaders spring on the local and national levels… [then there] is an opportunity to front with fresher, less compromised leaders.”

The call comes as corruption allegations deepen against President Ferdinand R. Marcos, Jr.’s administration less than three years before the next presidential vote. His slipping public approval could complicate efforts to rally voters behind his preferred successors.

Mr. Marcos’ satisfaction score fell to its lowest since he took office in 2022, according to a WR Numero Research poll released last week. About 21% of Filipinos approved of his performance in November, down 14 points from August.

The Philippines is confronting one of the biggest political crises of Mr. Marcos’ term, as lawmakers, officials and contractors face accusations of taking part in a kickback scheme that drained billions of pesos from flood mitigation funds.

Activists should “initiate a blacklist movement against those involved in corrupt practices,” said Anthony Lawrence A. Borja, an associate political science professor at De La Salle University. “If it’s effective, then such a movement can prevent implicated politicians from occupying public offices while serving as a warning for the elected.”

The widening scandal has triggered protests nationwide, especially in flood-prone provinces. The largest rallies have been held in the capital region, led by left-leaning groups and a coalition of church leaders and civil society organizations that accuse the government of failing to safeguard public funds.

Still, analysts said the movement needs to fix internal divisions to build a broader coalition.

Activists should “deal with their own disunity” to create a more cohesive anti-corruption front, Mr. Borja said. “This would allow them to attract more moderate citizens who share the same concerns.”

Public sentiment appears to favor the demonstrations. WR Numero Research said last week that 58% of Filipinos supported the Nov. 30 protests denouncing irregular flood control deals. About 18% opposed them, while two in 10 were unsure.

“The gap suggests that while only a minority are intensely mobilized, a much larger moral majority still stands behind the cause,” Cleve V. Arguelles, chief executive officer of WR Numero Research, said in a Viber message.

“It means support for the anti-corruption protests is both deep and wide, even if not everyone can join street actions,” he added.

Protest leaders also need a sharper message to expand their reach, said Ederson DT. Tapia, a public administration professor at the University of Makati.

“People will join a movement when they see how flood control corruption translates into the everyday misery of flooded streets, lost income and disrupted schooling,” he said via Messenger chat. “Organizers must make that link clearer so more sectors feel compelled to step in.”

Mr. Borja said organizers should keep the pressure up against the government to hold those liable to account.

“They should always remind the public on who are the ones involved in faulty flood control projects and establish a coalition that is focused on demanding accountability and free from elite politicking,” he said.

“Sustaining attention also requires discipline,” Mr. Tapia said. “A steady flow of updates, local monitoring, and well-timed public briefings tied to budget debates or audit releases can keep pressure alive long after the headlines fade.”

“The real test is whether this energy becomes reform,” he added, noting that independent oversight over public works contracts and making government bidding processes more transparent should be an objective for the protest movement.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

3 Paradoxes of Altcoin Season in September

3 Paradoxes of Altcoin Season in September

The post 3 Paradoxes of Altcoin Season in September appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Analyses and data indicate that the crypto market is experiencing its most active altcoin season since early 2025, with many altcoins outperforming Bitcoin. However, behind this excitement lies a paradox. Most retail investors remain uneasy as their portfolios show little to no profit. This article outlines the main reasons behind this situation. Altcoin Market Cap Rises but Dominance Shrinks Sponsored TradingView data shows that the TOTAL3 market cap (excluding BTC and ETH) reached a new high of over $1.1 trillion in September. Yet the share of OTHERS (excluding the top 10) has declined since 2022, now standing at just 8%. OTHERS Dominance And TOTAL3 Capitalization. Source: TradingView. In past cycles, such as 2017 and 2021, TOTAL3 and OTHERS.D rose together. That trend reflected capital flowing not only into large-cap altcoins but also into mid-cap and low-cap ones. The current divergence shows that capital is concentrated in stablecoins and a handful of top-10 altcoins such as SOL, XRP, BNB, DOG, HYPE, and LINK. Smaller altcoins receive far less liquidity, making it hard for their prices to return to levels where investors previously bought. This creates a situation where only a few win while most face losses. Retail investors also tend to diversify across many coins instead of adding size to top altcoins. That explains why many portfolios remain stagnant despite a broader market rally. Sponsored “Position sizing is everything. Many people hold 25–30 tokens at once. A 100x on a token that makes up only 1% of your portfolio won’t meaningfully change your life. It’s better to make a few high-conviction bets than to overdiversify,” analyst The DeFi Investor said. Altcoin Index Surges but Investor Sentiment Remains Cautious The Altcoin Season Index from Blockchain Center now stands at 80 points. This indicates that over 80% of the top 50 altcoins outperformed…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:43