The post Trump DOJ Wants Terra Founder Do Kwon Behind Bars for 12 Years, Citing SBF Sentence appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief The DOJ wants Do Kwon to receive the full 12-year prison sentence allowed under the plea deal he signed in August. Prosecutors say a lighter sentence would be unfair compared to Sam Bankman-Fried’s 25-year prison sentence. Kwon will be sentenced December 11 for two crimes: conspiracy to defraud and wire fraud. The Department of Justice is asking a federal judge to sentence Do Kwon to 12 years in prison—the maximum sentence prosecutors reserved the right to pursue after the Terra founder pleaded guilty this summer.  Though Kwon is technically eligible to serve 25 years in federal prison, the DOJ promised in August that it would only seek up to 12 years as part of a deal reached to encourage Kwon to forgo a jury trial and admit to two crimes: conspiracy to defraud, and wire fraud. Now, federal prosecutors are advocating that the disgraced crypto founder receive the maximum sentence under that deal. In a legal filing submitted late Thursday, DOJ lawyers argued that Kwon needs a stiff sentence to avoid “unwarranted sentencing disparities” with other, similar cases—namely, that of FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried.  In a 2023 jury trial, Bankman-Fried was found guilty of seven fraud and conspiracy charges for his role in his $32 billion crypto exchange’s implosion. A judge later sentenced him to 25 years in prison.  “Judge Kaplan imposed a sentence of 25 years on Bankman-Fried who, like Kwon, perpetrated a fraud of staggering proportions in his twenties and then attributed his brazen criminal conduct in part to youth and inexperience,” the prosecutors wrote. Kwon, a 34-year old Korean national, found himself at the center of a global financial meltdown in 2022 when two cryptocurrencies he created, UST and LUNA, rapidly became worthless, wiping out over $40 billion in value and triggering a cascading… The post Trump DOJ Wants Terra Founder Do Kwon Behind Bars for 12 Years, Citing SBF Sentence appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief The DOJ wants Do Kwon to receive the full 12-year prison sentence allowed under the plea deal he signed in August. Prosecutors say a lighter sentence would be unfair compared to Sam Bankman-Fried’s 25-year prison sentence. Kwon will be sentenced December 11 for two crimes: conspiracy to defraud and wire fraud. The Department of Justice is asking a federal judge to sentence Do Kwon to 12 years in prison—the maximum sentence prosecutors reserved the right to pursue after the Terra founder pleaded guilty this summer.  Though Kwon is technically eligible to serve 25 years in federal prison, the DOJ promised in August that it would only seek up to 12 years as part of a deal reached to encourage Kwon to forgo a jury trial and admit to two crimes: conspiracy to defraud, and wire fraud. Now, federal prosecutors are advocating that the disgraced crypto founder receive the maximum sentence under that deal. In a legal filing submitted late Thursday, DOJ lawyers argued that Kwon needs a stiff sentence to avoid “unwarranted sentencing disparities” with other, similar cases—namely, that of FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried.  In a 2023 jury trial, Bankman-Fried was found guilty of seven fraud and conspiracy charges for his role in his $32 billion crypto exchange’s implosion. A judge later sentenced him to 25 years in prison.  “Judge Kaplan imposed a sentence of 25 years on Bankman-Fried who, like Kwon, perpetrated a fraud of staggering proportions in his twenties and then attributed his brazen criminal conduct in part to youth and inexperience,” the prosecutors wrote. Kwon, a 34-year old Korean national, found himself at the center of a global financial meltdown in 2022 when two cryptocurrencies he created, UST and LUNA, rapidly became worthless, wiping out over $40 billion in value and triggering a cascading…

Trump DOJ Wants Terra Founder Do Kwon Behind Bars for 12 Years, Citing SBF Sentence

2025/12/06 05:17

In brief

  • The DOJ wants Do Kwon to receive the full 12-year prison sentence allowed under the plea deal he signed in August.
  • Prosecutors say a lighter sentence would be unfair compared to Sam Bankman-Fried’s 25-year prison sentence.
  • Kwon will be sentenced December 11 for two crimes: conspiracy to defraud and wire fraud.

The Department of Justice is asking a federal judge to sentence Do Kwon to 12 years in prison—the maximum sentence prosecutors reserved the right to pursue after the Terra founder pleaded guilty this summer. 

Though Kwon is technically eligible to serve 25 years in federal prison, the DOJ promised in August that it would only seek up to 12 years as part of a deal reached to encourage Kwon to forgo a jury trial and admit to two crimes: conspiracy to defraud, and wire fraud.

Now, federal prosecutors are advocating that the disgraced crypto founder receive the maximum sentence under that deal. In a legal filing submitted late Thursday, DOJ lawyers argued that Kwon needs a stiff sentence to avoid “unwarranted sentencing disparities” with other, similar cases—namely, that of FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried.

In a 2023 jury trial, Bankman-Fried was found guilty of seven fraud and conspiracy charges for his role in his $32 billion crypto exchange’s implosion. A judge later sentenced him to 25 years in prison. 

“Judge Kaplan imposed a sentence of 25 years on Bankman-Fried who, like Kwon, perpetrated a fraud of staggering proportions in his twenties and then attributed his brazen criminal conduct in part to youth and inexperience,” the prosecutors wrote.

Kwon, a 34-year old Korean national, found himself at the center of a global financial meltdown in 2022 when two cryptocurrencies he created, UST and LUNA, rapidly became worthless, wiping out over $40 billion in value and triggering a cascading crisis in the crypto market. The resulting “contagion” impacted FTX and several other notable firms.

In Thursday’s filing, prosecutors noted that Kwon’s attorneys failed to mention Bankman-Fried’s case in their request that the entrepreneur receive a five-year prison sentence.

“True, Bankman-Fried exercised his right to a trial,” the DOJ said. “But that scarcely justifies a 20-year delta between Bankman-Fried’s sentence and that requested by Kwon.”

The DOJ also took aim at Kwon’s attorneys for arguing the Terra founder should receive a “far shorter sentence” than Celsius founder Alex Mashinsky, who was handed 12 years earlier in 2025 for misappropriating his customers’ crypto and manipulating the price of his firm’s token.

“While Mashinsky was not detained pending trial and contested core aspects of his conduct, neither did he obtain a fake passport and try to live on the lam in a foreign country,” prosecutors said. “In any event, the magnitude of Mashinsky’s crime pales in comparison to Kwon’s: $5 billion versus $40 billion in investor losses.”

Kwon was arrested in Montenegro in 2023 and convicted of traveling with forged passports months after warrants were issued for his arrest in both the United States and South Korea. 

After an extremely protracted jurisdictional battle, the crypto entrepreneur was extradited to New York earlier this year.

Kwon will be sentenced in Manhattan on December 11 by U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer.

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

Source: https://decrypt.co/351106/trump-doj-wants-terra-founder-do-kwon-behind-bars-12-years-sbf

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Citadel pushes SEC to classify open-source developers as unregistered stockbrokers

Citadel pushes SEC to classify open-source developers as unregistered stockbrokers

The post Citadel pushes SEC to classify open-source developers as unregistered stockbrokers appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On Dec. 2, Citadel Securities filed a 13-page letter with the SEC arguing that decentralized protocols facilitating tokenized US equity trading already meet statutory definitions of exchanges and broker-dealers, and regulators should treat them accordingly. Two days later, the SEC’s Investor Advisory Committee convened a panel on tokenized equities that made clear the question is no longer whether stocks can move on-chain, but whether they can do so without dismantling the permissionless architecture that built DeFi. The gap between those two positions now defines the most consequential regulatory fight in crypto since the Howey test debates. Citadel’s letter arrived at the moment when tokenized equities stopped being a thought experiment. The firm welcomes tokenization in principle but insists that realizing its benefits requires applying “the key bedrock principles and investor protections that underpin the fairness, efficiency, and resiliency of US equity markets.” In other words, the document suggests that companies seeking to trade tokenized Apple shares must comply with Nasdaq rules, including transparent fees, consolidated tape reporting, market surveillance, fair access, and registration as an exchange or broker-dealer. The filing warns that granting broad exemptive relief to DeFi platforms creates a shadow US equity market in which liquidity fragments, retail investors lose Exchange Act protections, and incumbents face regulatory arbitrage from unregistered competitors. Within hours, Uniswap founder Hayden Adams fired back on X, calling Citadel’s position an attempt to “treat software developers of decentralized protocols like centralized intermediaries.” He invoked ConstitutionDAO, the 2021 crowdfunding effort that pooled $47 million in Ethereum to bid on a first-edition Constitution at Sotheby’s, only to lose to Griffin’s $43.2 million bid. Additionally, Adams zeroed in on Citadel’s fair-access argument, calling it “actual nerve” from the dominant player in retail order flow. The exchange captured crypto’s core narrative of permissionless code versus gatekeeper control and…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 02:32
RWA Tokenization and Crypto Activities Declared High-Risk, Unapproved

RWA Tokenization and Crypto Activities Declared High-Risk, Unapproved

The post RWA Tokenization and Crypto Activities Declared High-Risk, Unapproved appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways: Seven major Chinese financial associations issued a coordinated warning against RWA tokenization and all virtual-currency-related activity. Regulators stressed that no RWA tokenization projects are authorized in China, citing risks of fraud, speculation, and illegal fundraising. Institutions and individuals were told to avoid all forms of crypto involvement, while enforcement measures widen to include foreign firms serving mainland users. China has delivered one of its strongest signals yet that crypto-linked products, especially RWA tokenization remain firmly off-limits. A rare joint notice issued by seven national financial associations warns that emerging narratives around “stablecoins,” “air coins,” mining, and tokenized real-world assets are now being used as fronts for fraudulent fundraising, cross-border fund transfers, and market manipulation. Below is a structured, journalist-style breakdown of the alert, written uniquely, with expanded insights to help readers understand the regulatory landscape and its implications for global crypto markets. Read More: China to Shake Crypto Markets With First-Ever Yuan Stablecoin Plan Amid U.S. Dollar Dominance China’s Joint Warning: RWA Tokenization Not Approved and Considered High-Risk China’s latest advisory makes it clear that the rapid rise of RWA tokenization in global markets does not translate into tolerance at home. The notice states that financial regulators have not approved any RWA token issuance, trading, or financing activities inside the mainland. Officials emphasized that tokenizing traditional assets such as bonds, real estate claims, or corporate receivables introduces several layers of risk. These include: Fake or unverifiable underlying assets Operational and governance failures Speculative hype marketed as financial innovation Use of RWA tokens for illegal fundraising or unapproved securities issuance The message is unambiguous: any assumption that RWAs occupy a regulatory grey zone in China is incorrect. They are grouped alongside virtual currencies, mining schemes, and stablecoins as activities that can trigger criminal liability when conducted domestically. Why RWAs…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 02:40