The post Netflix-Warner Bros. deal: Regulatory questions emerge appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Logos of Netlfix and Warner Bros. Reuters The Netflix and Warner Bros. Discovery deal came together quickly — but its path to regulatory approval may not be so speedy. Netflix stunned the media industry on Friday when it announced its proposed $72 billion deal to acquire the iconic Warner Bros. film studio and streaming service HBO Max. The combination brings together two of the most popular streaming platforms in the business. Netflix reported 300 million global subscribers as of late 2024, the last time it reported the metric. HBO Max had 128 million customers as of Sept. 30. Netflix currently claims 46% of mobile app monthly active users in global streaming, according to data from market intelligence firm Sensor Tower. Combined with HBO Max, that share would rise to 56%, it found. “This deal cements Netflix’s position as the premier streaming service for original content,” according to a research note from analysts at William Blair on Friday. The size of the deal makes it ripe for scrutiny, from both industry insiders and U.S. lawmakers. The Trump administration is viewing the merger with “heavy skepticism,” CNBC reported Friday, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren has already called for an antitrust review. “This deal looks like an anti-monopoly nightmare. A Netflix-Warner Bros. would create one massive media giant with control of close to half of the streaming market — threatening to force Americans into higher subscription prices and fewer choices over what and how they watch, while putting American workers at risk,” Warren, a Democrat from Massachusetts, said in a statement. The merger would also give Netflix control over the famed Warner Bros. film studio, further consolidating the cinematic space and raising concerns that the number or typical windowing of popular releases could shrink. It’s typical in the days and weeks following a deal… The post Netflix-Warner Bros. deal: Regulatory questions emerge appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Logos of Netlfix and Warner Bros. Reuters The Netflix and Warner Bros. Discovery deal came together quickly — but its path to regulatory approval may not be so speedy. Netflix stunned the media industry on Friday when it announced its proposed $72 billion deal to acquire the iconic Warner Bros. film studio and streaming service HBO Max. The combination brings together two of the most popular streaming platforms in the business. Netflix reported 300 million global subscribers as of late 2024, the last time it reported the metric. HBO Max had 128 million customers as of Sept. 30. Netflix currently claims 46% of mobile app monthly active users in global streaming, according to data from market intelligence firm Sensor Tower. Combined with HBO Max, that share would rise to 56%, it found. “This deal cements Netflix’s position as the premier streaming service for original content,” according to a research note from analysts at William Blair on Friday. The size of the deal makes it ripe for scrutiny, from both industry insiders and U.S. lawmakers. The Trump administration is viewing the merger with “heavy skepticism,” CNBC reported Friday, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren has already called for an antitrust review. “This deal looks like an anti-monopoly nightmare. A Netflix-Warner Bros. would create one massive media giant with control of close to half of the streaming market — threatening to force Americans into higher subscription prices and fewer choices over what and how they watch, while putting American workers at risk,” Warren, a Democrat from Massachusetts, said in a statement. The merger would also give Netflix control over the famed Warner Bros. film studio, further consolidating the cinematic space and raising concerns that the number or typical windowing of popular releases could shrink. It’s typical in the days and weeks following a deal…

Netflix-Warner Bros. deal: Regulatory questions emerge

2025/12/06 04:45

Logos of Netlfix and Warner Bros.

Reuters

The Netflix and Warner Bros. Discovery deal came together quickly — but its path to regulatory approval may not be so speedy.

Netflix stunned the media industry on Friday when it announced its proposed $72 billion deal to acquire the iconic Warner Bros. film studio and streaming service HBO Max. The combination brings together two of the most popular streaming platforms in the business. Netflix reported 300 million global subscribers as of late 2024, the last time it reported the metric. HBO Max had 128 million customers as of Sept. 30.

Netflix currently claims 46% of mobile app monthly active users in global streaming, according to data from market intelligence firm Sensor Tower. Combined with HBO Max, that share would rise to 56%, it found.

“This deal cements Netflix’s position as the premier streaming service for original content,” according to a research note from analysts at William Blair on Friday.

The size of the deal makes it ripe for scrutiny, from both industry insiders and U.S. lawmakers.

The Trump administration is viewing the merger with “heavy skepticism,” CNBC reported Friday, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren has already called for an antitrust review.

“This deal looks like an anti-monopoly nightmare. A Netflix-Warner Bros. would create one massive media giant with control of close to half of the streaming market — threatening to force Americans into higher subscription prices and fewer choices over what and how they watch, while putting American workers at risk,” Warren, a Democrat from Massachusetts, said in a statement.

The merger would also give Netflix control over the famed Warner Bros. film studio, further consolidating the cinematic space and raising concerns that the number or typical windowing of popular releases could shrink.

It’s typical in the days and weeks following a deal announcement of this scale for interest groups, politicians and corporate competitors to call foul on antitrust grounds.

The Department of Justice is most likely to review the deal, as it has other media mergers in the past, and it could take some time. DOJ reviews can take anywhere from months to more than a year.

Netflix said Friday it expects the transaction to close in 12 to 18 months, after Warner Bros. Discovery spins out its portfolio of cable networks into Discovery Global.

Netflix confidence

Ted Sarandos, co-chief executive officer of Netflix , attends the annual Allen & Co. Media and Technology Conference in Sun Valley, Idaho on July 11th, 2025.

David A. Grogan | CNBC

Netflix executives on Friday said they were “highly confident” the deal would win regulatory approval.

“You know, this deal is pro-consumer, pro-innovation, pro-worker, it’s pro-creator, it’s pro-growth,” Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos said during an investor call following the acquisition announcement.

“Our plans here are to work really closely with all the appropriate governments and regulators, but [we’re] really confident that we’re going to get all the necessary approvals that we need,” Sarandos added.

As part of the deal, Netflix has agreed to pay a $5.8 billion breakup fee to Warner Bros. Discovery if the deal were to get blocked by the government.

Netflix’s bid won out over competing offers from Paramount Skydance and Comcast.

Analysts at Deutsche Bank and William Blair were at least minimally convinced Friday of the potential for the deal to go through.

“A merger of Warner Bros. Discovery and any of the three bidders would probably succeed, even if the DOJ were to sue to block a proposed combination,” Deutsche Bank analysts wrote in a note on Friday, citing insights from a Department of Justice veteran who the analysts said “does not see any significant antitrust problems with any of the three scenarios.”

“However … we don’t know all of the detailed facts that will be collected and analyzed by the DOJ, nor do we know who the judge hearing the case will be, and both of these factors can have an impact on the outcome,” the Deutsche Bank analysts noted.

Paramount, for its part, has been fanning the flames.

Paramount’s lawyers sent a letter to Warner Bros. Discovery this week, first reported by CNBC, in which it argued the sale process had been rigged in Netflix’s direction. The Wall Street Journal reported that in a separate letter, Paramount said a Netflix transaction would likely “never close” because of regulatory headwinds.

Paramount was the only bidder looking to buy WBD’s massive portfolio of pay-TV networks — and it’s unlikely to walk away from the process quietly.

Not so fast

Oracle co-founder, CTO and Executive Chairman Larry Ellison (C), U.S. President Donald Trump, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman (R), and SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son (2nd-R), share a laugh as Ellison uses a stool to stand on as he speaks during a news conference in the Roosevelt Room of the White House on January 21, 2025 in Washington, DC. Trump announced an investment in artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure and took questions on a range of topics including his presidential pardons of Jan. 6 defendants, the war in Ukraine, cryptocurrencies and other topics.

Andrew Harnik | Getty Images

Wall Street expected President Donald Trump’s second term to usher in a windfall of dealmaking. However, economic uncertainty has slowed the process for some companies, and regulatory holdups have played a bigger role than anticipated.

“Under Donald Trump, the antitrust review process has also become a cesspool of political favoritism and corruption,” Warren said in Friday’s statement. “The Justice Department must enforce our nation’s anti-monopoly laws fairly and transparently — not use the Warner Bros. deal review to invite influence-peddling and bribery.”

Paramount’s merger with Skydance was left in limbo for more than a year before it finally won federal approval in July.

The Federal Communications Commission (which is unlikely to review the Netflix-WBD tie-up since it doesn’t involve a broadcaster) signed off on the $8 billion merger shortly after Paramount agreed to pay $16 million to Trump to settle a lawsuit over the editing of a “60 Minutes” interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris. Paramount had also ended its diversity, equity and inclusion policies earlier in the year after the FCC said it would investigate the company over its DEI programs.

In September, the newly combined Paramount Skydance, run by David Ellison, set its sights on Warner Bros. Discovery. The company is now considering whether to take a hostile bid straight to WBD shareholders and try to unseat Netflix as the would-be buyer, CNBC reported Friday.

Ellison’s billionaire father, Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, is known to be close with Trump.

The argument for whether to clear Netflix’s proposed takeover of Warner Bros. would likely come down to questions around streaming — first, on pricing for consumers, and second, on how to define Netflix’s audience.

The pricing of streaming subscriptions has risen across the board in recent years. In 2022 Netflix instituted a cheaper, ad-supported model after years of resistance in an effort to beckon more customers. The following year, Disney followed with its own more-affordable plan.

Netflix is used to upending the legacy media industry. The company ended its DVD rentals business in 2023 and went all in on streaming. It’s since found massive scale and has taken over the zeitgeist with original series like “Squid Game,” “Wednesday,” “Stranger Things,” and “Bridgerton.”

Its maverick approach to media and its broadening foothold in the industry may be its saving grace in the eyes of regulators.

“My expectation on the regulatory side is Netflix is going to advocate and argue with their advisors for a very expansive definition of what their market is … so that would include broadcast, cable, subscription and ad-supported streaming,” said said Jeff Goldstein, a partner and managing director at AlixPartners, and co-lead of the U.S. Media group.

“And really, really, really importantly, that would include YouTube,” he said.

YouTube has come to dominate the industry when it comes to viewership. Nielsen once again reported in October than YouTube had the largest share of TV usage, with Netflix in sixth place and Warner Bros. Discovery in seventh place. Traditional media companies with linear networks — Disney, NBCUniversal, Fox and Paramount — filled the spots in between.

Critics of the deal will define Netflix’s reach more narrowly to try to demonstrate outsized dominance, said Goldstein.

“I believe that streaming is not a category. Television viewership is a category … you know, eyeballs might be a category,” media industry titan John Malone told CNBC in November when asked about antitrust questions surrounding the WBD sale process.

“But if you’re going to broaden the category to that, you got to take in YouTube and Facebook and the social networks, TikTok,” he said. “I mean, that’s really the question, is streaming a category? … Are studios a category … and is that going to get looked at hard? These regulatory things are a little bit difficult to predict.”

— CNBC’s Julia Boorstin contributed to this report.

Disclosure: Comcast is the parent company of NBCUniversal, which owns CNBC. Versant would become the new parent company of CNBC upon Comcast’s planned spinoff of Versant.

Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/05/netflix-warner-bros-deal-regulatory-questions.html

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

XRP Potential Double Bottom Strengthens Amid Ripple’s 250M Transfer

XRP Potential Double Bottom Strengthens Amid Ripple’s 250M Transfer

The post XRP Potential Double Bottom Strengthens Amid Ripple’s 250M Transfer appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ripple’s transfer of 250 million XRP to an unknown wallet has immediately altered the short-term liquidity for XRP price, reducing available tokens in sell zones and potentially supporting a bullish reversal. This move coincides with shrinking exchange reserves, signaling tighter supply amid growing buyer interest. Ripple transferred 250 million XRP, impacting circulating supply and exchange liquidity. XRP price shows a potential double-bottom pattern at $1.99, with a key neckline at $2.2443. Exchange reserves dropped 2.51%, while taker buy CVD rose, indicating stronger buyer aggression per CryptoQuant data. Ripple’s 250M XRP transfer tightens liquidity, boosting XRP price potential amid double-bottom signals. Explore how shrinking reserves and rising CVD support bullish trends—stay informed on crypto shifts today. What does Ripple’s 250 million XRP transfer mean for XRP price? Ripple’s transfer of 250 million XRP to an unknown wallet has reshaped the short-term liquidity environment for XRP price by reducing the number of tokens readily available in sell zones. This large movement, often seen as a strategic repositioning, highlights implications for circulating supply and forces traders to reassess market dynamics. As fewer XRP tokens sit in immediate exchange reserves, the transfer could amplify price reactions to buying pressure, especially with supporting on-chain indicators. How is the double-bottom pattern influencing XRP price action? XRP price has formed a potential double-bottom structure around the $1.99 level, where both touches demonstrated strong rejection from buyers, establishing this zone as a critical support. This pattern suggests a possible brief test near $1.90 before advancing, with the neckline at $2.2443 serving as the pivotal breakout point; surpassing it could target $2.5021. On-chain data from TradingView reinforces this setup, as volume profiles align with historical resistance breaks, and expert analysis from market observers notes that such formations often precede 10-15% rallies in similar conditions. Short sentences here emphasize: the…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 10:28
CME Group to Launch Solana and XRP Futures Options

CME Group to Launch Solana and XRP Futures Options

The post CME Group to Launch Solana and XRP Futures Options appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. An announcement was made by CME Group, the largest derivatives exchanger worldwide, revealed that it would introduce options for Solana and XRP futures. It is the latest addition to CME crypto derivatives as institutions and retail investors increase their demand for Solana and XRP. CME Expands Crypto Offerings With Solana and XRP Options Launch According to a press release, the launch is scheduled for October 13, 2025, pending regulatory approval. The new products will allow traders to access options on Solana, Micro Solana, XRP, and Micro XRP futures. Expiries will be offered on business days on a monthly, and quarterly basis to provide more flexibility to market players. CME Group said the contracts are designed to meet demand from institutions, hedge funds, and active retail traders. According to Giovanni Vicioso, the launch reflects high liquidity in Solana and XRP futures. Vicioso is the Global Head of Cryptocurrency Products for the CME Group. He noted that the new contracts will provide additional tools for risk management and exposure strategies. Recently, CME XRP futures registered record open interest amid ETF approval optimism, reinforcing confidence in contract demand. Cumberland, one of the leading liquidity providers, welcomed the development and said it highlights the shift beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. FalconX, another trading firm, added that rising digital asset treasuries are increasing the need for hedging tools on alternative tokens like Solana and XRP. High Record Trading Volumes Demand Solana and XRP Futures Solana futures and XRP continue to gain popularity since their launch earlier this year. According to CME official records, many have bought and sold more than 540,000 Solana futures contracts since March. A value that amounts to over $22 billion dollars. Solana contracts hit a record 9,000 contracts in August, worth $437 million. Open interest also set a record at 12,500 contracts.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:39
Peter Schiff Challenges Trump to U.S. Economy Debate After Bitcoin-Gold Clash with CZ

Peter Schiff Challenges Trump to U.S. Economy Debate After Bitcoin-Gold Clash with CZ

The post Peter Schiff Challenges Trump to U.S. Economy Debate After Bitcoin-Gold Clash with CZ appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Peter Schiff has challenged President Trump to a public debate on the U.S. economy following Trump’s criticism of his comments on the ongoing affordability crisis. This exchange highlights tensions over inflation, economic policies, and their impacts on everyday Americans amid claims of falling prices and recovery. Schiff’s Challenge: Gold advocate Peter Schiff proposes a debate to discuss Trump’s economic strategies and their role in rising costs. Trump’s Response: The president labels Schiff a detractor and insists prices are dropping, attributing issues to prior administration policies. Broader Context: Searches for affordability have surged 110% year-over-year, reflecting public concerns despite official dismissals, per Google data. Peter Schiff challenges Trump to debate U.S. economy amid affordability crisis and inflation debates. Explore Schiff’s views on Bitcoin vs. gold and policy impacts—stay informed on crypto’s role in financial stability today. What is Peter Schiff’s Challenge to President Trump About? Peter Schiff’s challenge to President Trump stems from a heated exchange over the U.S. economy’s health, particularly the affordability crisis affecting Americans. On December 6, 2025, during an appearance on Fox & Friends Weekend, Schiff highlighted how inflation is accelerating under current policies, exacerbating everyday cost pressures. Trump responded sharply on Truth Social, calling Schiff a “Trump hating loser” and claiming prices are falling dramatically, including gasoline at $1.99 per gallon in some states. Schiff then invited Trump or a representative to debate these economic realities publicly, emphasizing the need for truthful discourse on policy effectiveness. How Does Peter Schiff’s Debate with CZ Relate to Economic Concerns? Peter Schiff’s recent debate with Changpeng Zhao (CZ), founder of Binance, at Binance Blockchain Week in Dubai underscores his longstanding skepticism toward cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, tying directly into broader economic discussions on inflation and asset value. Schiff argued that Bitcoin lacks inherent value, serving only as a speculative tool…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 10:01