Bitcoin Magazine Vivek Ramaswamy’s Strive Urges MSCI to Rethink Bitcoin Index Exclusion Strive Asset Management warned MSCI that its plan to exclude bitcoin-heavy companies from major benchmarks could create inconsistent results due to differing accounting standards. This post Vivek Ramaswamy’s Strive Urges MSCI to Rethink Bitcoin Index Exclusion first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.Bitcoin Magazine Vivek Ramaswamy’s Strive Urges MSCI to Rethink Bitcoin Index Exclusion Strive Asset Management warned MSCI that its plan to exclude bitcoin-heavy companies from major benchmarks could create inconsistent results due to differing accounting standards. This post Vivek Ramaswamy’s Strive Urges MSCI to Rethink Bitcoin Index Exclusion first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Vivek Ramaswamy’s Strive Urges MSCI to Rethink Bitcoin Index Exclusion

2025/12/06 04:10

Bitcoin Magazine

Vivek Ramaswamy’s Strive Urges MSCI to Rethink Bitcoin Index Exclusion

Strive Asset Management is pushing back against MSCI’s latest proposal. The index provider suggested removing companies with bitcoin holdings over 50% of total assets from major equity benchmarks.

In a letter to MSCI CEO Henry Fernandez, Strive warned the plan could create uneven results worldwide. Companies report bitcoin differently under U.S. GAAP and IFRS accounting standards. Strive said this could lead to inconsistent outcomes for firms with similar exposure.

The Nasdaq-listed firm urged MSCI to rely on optional “ex-digital-asset treasury” index variants instead of redefining eligibility for broad benchmarks. These custom indexes already exist for sectors like energy and tobacco.

Strive is the 14th-largest public corporate bitcoin holder, with more than 7,500 BTC on its balance sheet. Its executives argued that the proposal would “depart from index neutrality” and asked MSCI to “let the market decide” how bitcoin-heavy firms are treated.

Co-founded by Vivek Ramaswamy and Anson Frericks in 2022, Strive has a mission to “depoliticize corporate America.”

MSCI’s ruling affect on companies like Strive and Strategy

The rule change could affect major players like Strategy, which holds 650,000 BTC. JPMorgan estimates MSCI’s exclusion could trigger $2.8 billion in passive outflows from Strategy alone. If other index providers follow suit, the total could rise to $8.8 billion.

Strive’s letter criticized the 50% threshold as “unjustified, overbroad and unworkable.” Many bitcoin treasury companies operate real businesses. 

These include AI data centers, structured finance, and cloud infrastructure. Miners such as MARA, Riot, Hut 8, and CleanSpark are pivoting into renting excess power and compute capacity.

The firm drew comparisons to other industries. Indexes do not exclude energy companies with large oil reserves or gold miners whose value depends on metals. Applying a bitcoin-specific rule, Strive argued, imposes an investment judgment on benchmarks meant to remain neutral.

Executives also highlighted market volatility and accounting differences. Bitcoin’s price swings could push companies in and out of eligibility from quarter to quarter. Derivatives or structured products further complicate exposure calculations.

Strive warned that strict rules could push innovation abroad. U.S. markets may face penalties, while international companies benefit from IFRS treatment. The firm believes the proposal may stifle new bitcoin-backed financial products.

MSCI plans to announce its decision on January 15, 2026, before the February index review. Strive is among several firms lobbying against the proposal. Its argument centers on fairness, neutrality, and market choice rather than restricting investor access.

Last week, Strategy’s Michael Saylor disputed MSCI index disputes and clarified that Strategy is a publicly traded operating company with a $500 million software business and a treasury strategy using Bitcoin, not a fund, trust, or holding company. 

This post Vivek Ramaswamy’s Strive Urges MSCI to Rethink Bitcoin Index Exclusion first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Micah Zimmerman.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
UNI Price Prediction: Critical Support Test at $5.37 – Next Target $7.88 by January 2025

UNI Price Prediction: Critical Support Test at $5.37 – Next Target $7.88 by January 2025

The post UNI Price Prediction: Critical Support Test at $5.37 – Next Target $7.88 by January 2025 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Peter Zhang Dec 06, 2025 06:55 UNI price prediction shows critical support test at $5.37 with potential rebound to $7.88 target. Technical analysis reveals oversold conditions setting up recovery. Uniswap (UNI) is trading at a critical juncture as the token tests key support levels following a sharp 7.39% decline in the past 24 hours. With UNI currently priced at $5.51, our comprehensive technical analysis reveals both immediate risks and potential opportunities for the leading decentralized exchange token. UNI Price Prediction Summary • UNI short-term target (1 week): $6.20-$6.50 (+12-18%) • Uniswap medium-term forecast (1 month): $7.50-$8.35 range• Key level to break for bullish continuation: $5.98 (24h high) • Critical support if bearish: $5.37 (immediate support) Recent Uniswap Price Predictions from Analysts Recent analyst predictions show a mixed but cautiously optimistic outlook for UNI. Altpricer’s UNI price prediction targets $7.81 in the short term, citing slight upward momentum despite current volatility. Meanwhile, CoinCodex maintains a more conservative Uniswap forecast with an $8.35 target, though their analysis acknowledges bearish sentiment with key support levels identified at $9.02, $8.69, and $8.43. The consensus among analysts suggests that while immediate pressure exists, the UNI price target range of $7.81-$8.35 represents realistic upside potential once current support levels hold. However, confidence levels remain moderate due to broader market uncertainty and DeFi sector headwinds. UNI Technical Analysis: Setting Up for Potential Recovery The current Uniswap technical analysis reveals several compelling signals that support a cautiously bullish outlook. With UNI trading at $5.51, the token sits precariously close to its immediate support at $5.37, just 2.5% below current levels. The RSI reading of 39.09 indicates UNI is approaching oversold territory without being deeply oversold, suggesting limited downside momentum. More importantly, the Bollinger Bands analysis shows UNI at a %B…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 04:31