The post Seed Funding Vs Series A appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Raising money in crypto and Web3 is quite different from traditional startups. With token models, on-chain milestones, and unique business models, the rules change fast. Understanding Seed Funding vs Series A, crypto fundraising matters if you want to know how much to raise, what investors expect, and how traction works on-chain.  This guide breaks down valuations, capital goals, stage expectations, and how the funding process works, so you can see the full picture. In this article, we explain the difference between Seed and Series A in crypto, how to avoid common mistakes, and give you a clear idea of what founders, investors, and contributors should expect at each stage. Key Takeaway Seed funding is your first step to test your idea, build an MVP, and start growing a small community. Series A is about scaling your project, expanding the team, growing users, and refining token economics. Valuations in crypto depend on token supply, circulating market cap, community engagement, on-chain activity, and product traction.\ Overview of Crypto Fundraising Stages In crypto fundraising, the stages are similar to traditional startups but work in more innovative ways. In a regular startup, you raise money by selling equity, which means giving investors a part of your company. In crypto-native models, you can raise money by selling tokens instead of shares.  This changes valuations and how rounds are structured, as token price and total supply matter more than ownership percentage. Early-stage rounds start with Pre-seed, where you test your idea. Afterward is the Seed, where you get the first big support.  Next is Series A, which focuses on growth and traction. In crypto, some projects include Token Generation Events (TGE) to distribute tokens to investors and the community. These series funding rounds show how far a project has come and what stage it is ready… The post Seed Funding Vs Series A appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Raising money in crypto and Web3 is quite different from traditional startups. With token models, on-chain milestones, and unique business models, the rules change fast. Understanding Seed Funding vs Series A, crypto fundraising matters if you want to know how much to raise, what investors expect, and how traction works on-chain.  This guide breaks down valuations, capital goals, stage expectations, and how the funding process works, so you can see the full picture. In this article, we explain the difference between Seed and Series A in crypto, how to avoid common mistakes, and give you a clear idea of what founders, investors, and contributors should expect at each stage. Key Takeaway Seed funding is your first step to test your idea, build an MVP, and start growing a small community. Series A is about scaling your project, expanding the team, growing users, and refining token economics. Valuations in crypto depend on token supply, circulating market cap, community engagement, on-chain activity, and product traction.\ Overview of Crypto Fundraising Stages In crypto fundraising, the stages are similar to traditional startups but work in more innovative ways. In a regular startup, you raise money by selling equity, which means giving investors a part of your company. In crypto-native models, you can raise money by selling tokens instead of shares.  This changes valuations and how rounds are structured, as token price and total supply matter more than ownership percentage. Early-stage rounds start with Pre-seed, where you test your idea. Afterward is the Seed, where you get the first big support.  Next is Series A, which focuses on growth and traction. In crypto, some projects include Token Generation Events (TGE) to distribute tokens to investors and the community. These series funding rounds show how far a project has come and what stage it is ready…

Seed Funding Vs Series A

2025/12/05 18:14

Raising money in crypto and Web3 is quite different from traditional startups. With token models, on-chain milestones, and unique business models, the rules change fast. Understanding Seed Funding vs Series A, crypto fundraising matters if you want to know how much to raise, what investors expect, and how traction works on-chain. 

This guide breaks down valuations, capital goals, stage expectations, and how the funding process works, so you can see the full picture. In this article, we explain the difference between Seed and Series A in crypto, how to avoid common mistakes, and give you a clear idea of what founders, investors, and contributors should expect at each stage.

Key Takeaway

  • Seed funding is your first step to test your idea, build an MVP, and start growing a small community.
  • Series A is about scaling your project, expanding the team, growing users, and refining token economics.
  • Valuations in crypto depend on token supply, circulating market cap, community engagement, on-chain activity, and product traction.\

Overview of Crypto Fundraising Stages

In crypto fundraising, the stages are similar to traditional startups but work in more innovative ways. In a regular startup, you raise money by selling equity, which means giving investors a part of your company. In crypto-native models, you can raise money by selling tokens instead of shares. 

This changes valuations and how rounds are structured, as token price and total supply matter more than ownership percentage. Early-stage rounds start with Pre-seed, where you test your idea. Afterward is the Seed, where you get the first big support. 

Next is Series A, which focuses on growth and traction. In crypto, some projects include Token Generation Events (TGE) to distribute tokens to investors and the community. These series funding rounds show how far a project has come and what stage it is ready for.

What is Seed Funding in Crypto?

Seed funding is the first money you raise to test your idea, build a simple version of your product (MVP), and start growing a small community. The goal is to prove your idea works and show people your project has potential before a full launch.

Seed rounds in crypto usually range from $500,000 to $5 million, depending on your story, tech complexity, and team strength. Recent examples include L1 and L2 infrastructure projects, DeFi protocols, gaming platforms, and RWA platforms startups raising seed rounds in this range. For instance, Turtle, a Web3 liquidity protocol, raised $5.5 million, and Ryder closed a $3.2 million seed round.

Valuations for seed rounds vary, too. Token-based rounds often have fully diluted valuations (FDV) of $10 million to $30 million, while equity-only rounds are lower. Factors that influence valuation often include team, narrative strength, tech difficulty, market timing, and token design.

Investors in seed rounds include angel investors, crypto-native venture capital firms, incubators like Binance Labs or Outlier Ventures, and DAO grant programs. They also include strategic investors who see long-term value in your project. At this stage, they expect a working MVP or demo, a strong founding team with complementary skills, early proof of concept and community traction, and a clear token model, even if it’s not launched yet.

What is Series A Funding in Crypto?

Series A funding in crypto is the stage where your project moves from building a basic product to scaling it. A good example is Camp Network, which secured $30 million in its Series A to scale its Layer-1 blockchain and improve token utility. Another example is Tempo, which raised $500 million to expand its DeFi and payment solutions.

Series A rounds raise between $8 million and $30 million or more, depending on whether the project is in infrastructure, DeFi, gaming, or other areas. Valuations usually range from $50 million to over $150 million. It can be higher for Layer‑1/Layer‑2 chains, AI-crypto projects, or real-world-asset platforms because of bigger technical risk and market potential. 

Investors at this stage include large institutional VCs like Paradigm and Pantera, corporate venture arms such as Coinbase Ventures and Circle Venture, and even traditional funds entering Web3. When investing in early-stage startups, these investors expect strong user traction, clear product-market fit, and solid security compliance. They also look for early revenue or a clear revenue model, a scalable architecture, a clear roadmap, and defined token utility and unlock schedules.

Key Differences Between Seed and Series A in Crypto 

Aspect

Seed Funding

Series A Funding

Funding purposeGet your idea off the ground and build a prototype or early productScale the product, grow users, expand the team, and increase market reach
Team maturityFounders and a small core team, roles may overlapMore structured team with specialists, defined roles, and leadership in place
Token design stageEarly concept or testnet stageTokenomics refined, mainnet ready, with planned use cases and distribution strategy
Community size & engagementSmall early supporters, test users, early adoptersLarge, active, and engaged community showing real interest and adoption
Fundraising instrumentsSAFEs, SAFTs, early token pre-salesToken warrants, structured SAFTs, equity with more detailed investor terms

How Crypto Startups Use Seed vs Series A Funds?

When a crypto startup raises Seed money, it usually spends it on building the product, running security audits, growing the community, writing documentation, and sometimes providing early liquidity. For example, Neptune Protocol raised about $3.9 million in a seed round to develop its USDN stablecoin, run audits, and expand its team. 

At the Series A stage, funds go to partnerships, multi-chain deployment, liquidity provisioning, compliance, marketing, and business operations. Rarible raised $14.2 million in Series A to expand its team, launch on Flow, and grow its NFT marketplace. In the startup financing cycle, seed sets the foundation, and Series A pushes growth.

Valuations in Crypto – How They’re Calculated Across Startup Funding Stages?

Valuation in crypto means figuring out what a project is worth at any point. The two main numbers are the circulating market cap and FDV. Circulating market cap is the token price multiplied by the number of tokens already trading. FDV is the price multiplied by the total supply, even for tokens that are locked. FDV often looks bigger, which might be confusing if you don’t check how many tokens are unlocked. 

Liquidity also affects value. If a project has low trading volume or a thin market, one big sell can move the price fast. Token unlock schedules matter too because future unlocks increase supply and can pull the price down.

Valuations are also shaped by metrics. On-chain data like active wallets, transactions, and TVL show real usage. Off-chain signs like partnerships or product updates show future growth. Community traction is a big signal because a project with strong engagement often attracts demand. In hype seasons, valuations jump as everyone rushes in. A clear example was the Hyperliquid HYPE token, which gained 300% and pushed its FDV to $41.05 billion while the actual market cap was much lower. However, in bear seasons, they drop as demand weakens and unlocks add pressure.

Milestones Crypto Startups Should Hit Before Raising

At the Seed stage, you want to show that your idea works in a basic form. You need a simple prototype or MVP (Minimum Viable Product), a clear whitepaper or litepaper, and a rough token model that explains how your token will work. You also need some early users or testnet activity, even if small, to prove people care about what you’re building. 

A short technical roadmap and a plan for future security audits help investors see that you know where the project is going. For instance, liquid staking projects like aPriori raised $8million in seed funding after showing strong testnet progress and a clear token model, and BounceBit, which secured its seed round while still on testnet with a solid dual-token design and roadmap.

At the Series A stage, investors expect much more. Your product should be live on mainnet, with real users each month who return because they get value from the product. You should have clear revenue or usage metrics that show your project is growing. Your audits should be complete, your partnerships active, and your token model finished, with a clear plan for your TGE. Many Series A teams reach this level only after showing strong user traction, working on mainnet products, and proof that the project can scale.

Alternatives to Seed and Series A Funding

  1. Token Presale or Private Sale

    This is when you sell your tokens to a small group of investors before the public. It gives you quick funds and helps you bring in strong partners. Magic Square used a private and public sale mix and saw huge demand, with over $20M pledged during its early sale phase.

  2. Initial Exchange Offering (IEO)

    With an IEO, a centralized exchange hosts your token sale. The exchange handles the sale, screens buyers, and gives your project more trust.

  3. Grants and Quadratic Funding

    Grants give you funding without giving up tokens or equity. Gitcoin has given out over $20M to Web3 teams through community voting and matching pools. The Avalanche Foundation also runs grant programs to support early builders.

  4. DAO-Based Funding

    Some teams raise money through a DAO. The community pools funds and decides which projects to support. This is suitable for Web3 projects that seek community ownership from day one.

  5. Initial Staking Pool Offering (ISPO)

Here, users stake their tokens in a pool. Instead of giving you cash, they delegate their stake, and you earn the rewards to fund development. Cardano-based projects helped make this model popular. In return, supporters earn your project’s token.

Conclusion

This guide has shown that Seed and Series A funding in crypto defines the path of your project, from testing ideas to scaling products and communities. This will help you plan your fundraising, understand what investors expect, and hit the right milestones at each stage. Remember to research legal rules, token distribution details, and long-term strategy before raising. Without this knowledge, even a strong product and community can face delays, loss of credibility, or failed funding rounds.

Source: https://coingape.com/seed-funding-vs-series-a/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

XRP Potential Double Bottom Strengthens Amid Ripple’s 250M Transfer

XRP Potential Double Bottom Strengthens Amid Ripple’s 250M Transfer

The post XRP Potential Double Bottom Strengthens Amid Ripple’s 250M Transfer appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ripple’s transfer of 250 million XRP to an unknown wallet has immediately altered the short-term liquidity for XRP price, reducing available tokens in sell zones and potentially supporting a bullish reversal. This move coincides with shrinking exchange reserves, signaling tighter supply amid growing buyer interest. Ripple transferred 250 million XRP, impacting circulating supply and exchange liquidity. XRP price shows a potential double-bottom pattern at $1.99, with a key neckline at $2.2443. Exchange reserves dropped 2.51%, while taker buy CVD rose, indicating stronger buyer aggression per CryptoQuant data. Ripple’s 250M XRP transfer tightens liquidity, boosting XRP price potential amid double-bottom signals. Explore how shrinking reserves and rising CVD support bullish trends—stay informed on crypto shifts today. What does Ripple’s 250 million XRP transfer mean for XRP price? Ripple’s transfer of 250 million XRP to an unknown wallet has reshaped the short-term liquidity environment for XRP price by reducing the number of tokens readily available in sell zones. This large movement, often seen as a strategic repositioning, highlights implications for circulating supply and forces traders to reassess market dynamics. As fewer XRP tokens sit in immediate exchange reserves, the transfer could amplify price reactions to buying pressure, especially with supporting on-chain indicators. How is the double-bottom pattern influencing XRP price action? XRP price has formed a potential double-bottom structure around the $1.99 level, where both touches demonstrated strong rejection from buyers, establishing this zone as a critical support. This pattern suggests a possible brief test near $1.90 before advancing, with the neckline at $2.2443 serving as the pivotal breakout point; surpassing it could target $2.5021. On-chain data from TradingView reinforces this setup, as volume profiles align with historical resistance breaks, and expert analysis from market observers notes that such formations often precede 10-15% rallies in similar conditions. Short sentences here emphasize: the…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 10:28
CME Group to Launch Solana and XRP Futures Options

CME Group to Launch Solana and XRP Futures Options

The post CME Group to Launch Solana and XRP Futures Options appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. An announcement was made by CME Group, the largest derivatives exchanger worldwide, revealed that it would introduce options for Solana and XRP futures. It is the latest addition to CME crypto derivatives as institutions and retail investors increase their demand for Solana and XRP. CME Expands Crypto Offerings With Solana and XRP Options Launch According to a press release, the launch is scheduled for October 13, 2025, pending regulatory approval. The new products will allow traders to access options on Solana, Micro Solana, XRP, and Micro XRP futures. Expiries will be offered on business days on a monthly, and quarterly basis to provide more flexibility to market players. CME Group said the contracts are designed to meet demand from institutions, hedge funds, and active retail traders. According to Giovanni Vicioso, the launch reflects high liquidity in Solana and XRP futures. Vicioso is the Global Head of Cryptocurrency Products for the CME Group. He noted that the new contracts will provide additional tools for risk management and exposure strategies. Recently, CME XRP futures registered record open interest amid ETF approval optimism, reinforcing confidence in contract demand. Cumberland, one of the leading liquidity providers, welcomed the development and said it highlights the shift beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. FalconX, another trading firm, added that rising digital asset treasuries are increasing the need for hedging tools on alternative tokens like Solana and XRP. High Record Trading Volumes Demand Solana and XRP Futures Solana futures and XRP continue to gain popularity since their launch earlier this year. According to CME official records, many have bought and sold more than 540,000 Solana futures contracts since March. A value that amounts to over $22 billion dollars. Solana contracts hit a record 9,000 contracts in August, worth $437 million. Open interest also set a record at 12,500 contracts.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:39
Peter Schiff Challenges Trump to U.S. Economy Debate After Bitcoin-Gold Clash with CZ

Peter Schiff Challenges Trump to U.S. Economy Debate After Bitcoin-Gold Clash with CZ

The post Peter Schiff Challenges Trump to U.S. Economy Debate After Bitcoin-Gold Clash with CZ appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Peter Schiff has challenged President Trump to a public debate on the U.S. economy following Trump’s criticism of his comments on the ongoing affordability crisis. This exchange highlights tensions over inflation, economic policies, and their impacts on everyday Americans amid claims of falling prices and recovery. Schiff’s Challenge: Gold advocate Peter Schiff proposes a debate to discuss Trump’s economic strategies and their role in rising costs. Trump’s Response: The president labels Schiff a detractor and insists prices are dropping, attributing issues to prior administration policies. Broader Context: Searches for affordability have surged 110% year-over-year, reflecting public concerns despite official dismissals, per Google data. Peter Schiff challenges Trump to debate U.S. economy amid affordability crisis and inflation debates. Explore Schiff’s views on Bitcoin vs. gold and policy impacts—stay informed on crypto’s role in financial stability today. What is Peter Schiff’s Challenge to President Trump About? Peter Schiff’s challenge to President Trump stems from a heated exchange over the U.S. economy’s health, particularly the affordability crisis affecting Americans. On December 6, 2025, during an appearance on Fox & Friends Weekend, Schiff highlighted how inflation is accelerating under current policies, exacerbating everyday cost pressures. Trump responded sharply on Truth Social, calling Schiff a “Trump hating loser” and claiming prices are falling dramatically, including gasoline at $1.99 per gallon in some states. Schiff then invited Trump or a representative to debate these economic realities publicly, emphasizing the need for truthful discourse on policy effectiveness. How Does Peter Schiff’s Debate with CZ Relate to Economic Concerns? Peter Schiff’s recent debate with Changpeng Zhao (CZ), founder of Binance, at Binance Blockchain Week in Dubai underscores his longstanding skepticism toward cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, tying directly into broader economic discussions on inflation and asset value. Schiff argued that Bitcoin lacks inherent value, serving only as a speculative tool…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 10:01