PANews reported on June 27 that Across Protocol co-founder Hart Lambur responded to anonymous user Ogle's accusations against his team and protocol on social media today. He said that Ogle'sPANews reported on June 27 that Across Protocol co-founder Hart Lambur responded to anonymous user Ogle's accusations against his team and protocol on social media today. He said that Ogle's

Across Protocol Co-founder Responds to Allegations on the Use of $23 Million in Funds

2025/06/27 15:23

PANews reported on June 27 that Across Protocol co-founder Hart Lambur responded to anonymous user Ogle's accusations against his team and protocol on social media today. He said that Ogle's accusations were completely untrue and pointed out that Ogle had close ties with Across competitors LayerZero and Stargate.

In response to Ogle’s accusation that “$23 million was withdrawn from the DAO for private gain,” Lambur said that Risk Labs is a non-profit organization, the use of funds is subject to strict legal supervision, and the funds have been used for protocol development and team expansion.

In addition, regarding the accusation of "manipulating the governance process through internal voting", Lambur stated that it was legal and transparent for team members to purchase ACX tokens and participate in the voting, and the relevant voting process was open and not subject to negative votes. He also refuted the claim of "violating the commitment to limit token sales", saying that these allegations were unfounded. Lambur emphasized that Risk Labs was selling existing tokens, which had nothing to do with the two-year lock-up period stipulated in the proposal, and all relevant tokens were still stored in the Risk Labs multi-signature address.

Earlier news, Across was accused of its team siphoning $23 million from the DAO treasury for its private company by manipulating votes .

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
BFX Presale Raises $7.5M as Solana Holds $243 and Avalanche Eyes $1B Treasury — Best Cryptos to Buy in 2025

BFX Presale Raises $7.5M as Solana Holds $243 and Avalanche Eyes $1B Treasury — Best Cryptos to Buy in 2025

BFX presale hits $7.5M with tokens at $0.024 and 30% bonus code BLOCK30, while Solana holds $243 and Avalanche builds a $1B treasury to attract institutions.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 01:07
XRP Price Prediction: XRP to Soar as This Top Crypto Under $0.05 Eyes 5000% Rally

XRP Price Prediction: XRP to Soar as This Top Crypto Under $0.05 Eyes 5000% Rally

While the sentiment grows with regard to a possible positive breakout in the XRP pricing, expert investors continue to turn their attention to the best cryptocurrency
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/12/29 01:30