The post No, Cardano Hydra Head Might Not Be 100% Secure, Here’s the Reason appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Renowned Cardano (ADA) advocate Armor Tesar, also known as YODA on X, has issued an important caution on Hydra. The warning is important to help users and operators understand the security setup of the layer-2 scaling solution for Cardano. Hydra operators hold authority over locked ADA funds According to YODA, while Hydra allows for faster and cheaper transactions, there are critical details that users need to be aware of. Notably, only Hydra operators are fully in charge of their ADA. It implies, therefore, that any user not running their own node is at the mercy of the Hydra operator. This is because any user who locks their ADA into a Hydra head automatically gives up control. For clarity, once locked, the user’s private key can no longer directly access the funds, as they are controlled by the Hydra head smart contract, not the user’s wallet. If you want to use Hydra, you trust the operators of Hydra Head. You are only in control of your funds if you are one of the Hydra Head operators. When you lock ADA into a Hydra Head, you sign a transaction with your private key. The transaction sends ADA into an on-chain… pic.twitter.com/hbh78guPLY — Cardano YOD₳ (@JaromirTesar) December 4, 2025 It means that even without having a user’s private keys, the operators can still control what happens to the funds. The operators have this power because, inside the Hydra system, every update requires signatures from all operators, not users. Thus, operators can agree on any state, even a malicious one. Based on the design of the Hydra system, once the on-chain Hydra smart contract accepts the operator’s signatures, that becomes the “truth” when the Hydra head closes. YODA is warning that this poses a major security risk, as operators could collude to sign a fake snapshot and… The post No, Cardano Hydra Head Might Not Be 100% Secure, Here’s the Reason appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Renowned Cardano (ADA) advocate Armor Tesar, also known as YODA on X, has issued an important caution on Hydra. The warning is important to help users and operators understand the security setup of the layer-2 scaling solution for Cardano. Hydra operators hold authority over locked ADA funds According to YODA, while Hydra allows for faster and cheaper transactions, there are critical details that users need to be aware of. Notably, only Hydra operators are fully in charge of their ADA. It implies, therefore, that any user not running their own node is at the mercy of the Hydra operator. This is because any user who locks their ADA into a Hydra head automatically gives up control. For clarity, once locked, the user’s private key can no longer directly access the funds, as they are controlled by the Hydra head smart contract, not the user’s wallet. If you want to use Hydra, you trust the operators of Hydra Head. You are only in control of your funds if you are one of the Hydra Head operators. When you lock ADA into a Hydra Head, you sign a transaction with your private key. The transaction sends ADA into an on-chain… pic.twitter.com/hbh78guPLY — Cardano YOD₳ (@JaromirTesar) December 4, 2025 It means that even without having a user’s private keys, the operators can still control what happens to the funds. The operators have this power because, inside the Hydra system, every update requires signatures from all operators, not users. Thus, operators can agree on any state, even a malicious one. Based on the design of the Hydra system, once the on-chain Hydra smart contract accepts the operator’s signatures, that becomes the “truth” when the Hydra head closes. YODA is warning that this poses a major security risk, as operators could collude to sign a fake snapshot and…

No, Cardano Hydra Head Might Not Be 100% Secure, Here’s the Reason

2025/12/05 06:13

Renowned Cardano (ADA) advocate Armor Tesar, also known as YODA on X, has issued an important caution on Hydra. The warning is important to help users and operators understand the security setup of the layer-2 scaling solution for Cardano.

Hydra operators hold authority over locked ADA funds

According to YODA, while Hydra allows for faster and cheaper transactions, there are critical details that users need to be aware of. Notably, only Hydra operators are fully in charge of their ADA. It implies, therefore, that any user not running their own node is at the mercy of the Hydra operator.

This is because any user who locks their ADA into a Hydra head automatically gives up control. For clarity, once locked, the user’s private key can no longer directly access the funds, as they are controlled by the Hydra head smart contract, not the user’s wallet.

It means that even without having a user’s private keys, the operators can still control what happens to the funds. The operators have this power because, inside the Hydra system, every update requires signatures from all operators, not users. Thus, operators can agree on any state, even a malicious one.

Based on the design of the Hydra system, once the on-chain Hydra smart contract accepts the operator’s signatures, that becomes the “truth” when the Hydra head closes.

YODA is warning that this poses a major security risk, as operators could collude to sign a fake snapshot and direct the funds to themselves. He is emphasizing that the only way to have full control of one’s fund is to be a Hydra operator.

If, however, a user delegates their funds and uses Hydra through an operator, they have to “rely” on the operator not to cheat. This requires a high level of trust in the Hydra operators.

You Might Also Like

Cardano community urged to prioritize trust 

YODA’s message to Cardano users is that Hydra is only truly trustless for people who run a node themselves. 

Every other user is effectively using it the same way as a custodial service. In essence, before one decides to use a Hydra-based DeFi app, they must do their own research.

It is important to know who the operators are and whether they are trustworthy enough not to team up with malicious actors to redirect users’ funds.

Hydra has been so dogged with speculation that even Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson had to wade in in 2024 to address concerns about it.

Source: https://u.today/no-cardano-hydra-head-might-not-be-100-secure-heres-the-reason

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

South Korea Revisits Crypto Exchange Liability Amid Hacking Risks

South Korea Revisits Crypto Exchange Liability Amid Hacking Risks

The post South Korea Revisits Crypto Exchange Liability Amid Hacking Risks appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: South Korea considers no-fault liability for virtual asset exchanges. Legislation aims to enhance operator accountability in cyber attacks. Pending fines could reach 3% of sales for hacking cases. South Korea’s Financial Services Commission is contemplating imposing no-fault liability on virtual asset operators for hacking-related damages, according to a Yonhap News Agency report on December 7. This potential legislation aligns virtual asset operators with financial institutions, impacting regulatory dynamics and market stability in South Korea’s evolving crypto sector. South Korea Targets Crypto Exchanges with 3% Sales Fines The Financial Services Commission (FSC) of South Korea is considering adding a clause to its draft legislation, imposing no-fault liability on virtual asset operators. This move follows a series of 20 computer incidents on top Korean won exchanges, emphasizing the need for enhanced security measures. The FSC aims to align virtual asset exchange liabilities with those of financial companies. South Korean lawmakers are debating stricter penalties, with proposed fines reaching 3% of sales revenue, paralleling measures in the Electronic Financial Transactions Act. Current maximum fines are capped at 5 billion won. This legislative shift reflects the government’s commitment to improving user protection and response strategies in the crypto sector. Industry reactions have been mixed. While there has been no official statement from major exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb, stakeholders are closely monitoring developments. Discussions on cryptocurrency forums and social media emphasize the potential impact on exchange compliance efforts and security enhancements. No-Fault Liability: Potential Game-Changer for Crypto Compliance Did you know? The concept of no-fault liability is already applied to South Korean banks for voice phishing cases, setting a precedent for proposed crypto exchange regulations. According to CoinMarketCap, Bitcoin (BTC), as of 06:31 UTC on December 7, 2025, has a market cap of $1.79 trillion. The 24-hour trading volume declined by 41.05%…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 14:37