South Korea is fast approaching a turning point in its regulation of digital assets as lawmakers and financial authorities are reportedly working on a plan to restrict the issuance of Korean-won-pegged stablecoins to consortia in which commercial banks hold a majority stake. The plan, which was reportedly discussed in a closed meeting that involved lawmakers […]South Korea is fast approaching a turning point in its regulation of digital assets as lawmakers and financial authorities are reportedly working on a plan to restrict the issuance of Korean-won-pegged stablecoins to consortia in which commercial banks hold a majority stake. The plan, which was reportedly discussed in a closed meeting that involved lawmakers […]

South Korea is weighing a rule that limits won-stablecoin issuance to consortia where commercial banks hold at least a 51% stake

South Korea is fast approaching a turning point in its regulation of digital assets as lawmakers and financial authorities are reportedly working on a plan to restrict the issuance of Korean-won-pegged stablecoins to consortia in which commercial banks hold a majority stake.

The plan, which was reportedly discussed in a closed meeting that involved lawmakers from the ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DP), officials from the Financial Services Commission (FSC), and representatives of the banking industry on December 1, comes as part of the ongoing effort to enact a comprehensive Digital Asset Basic Act, which will regulate stablecoins and other digital assets and their issuance.

Banks lead, fintechs follow in the proposed consortium

Under the new framework, stablecoin issuers will take the form of a consortium, with banks holding at least 51% of the shares.

Speaking after the meeting, Kang Junhyun, the Democratic Party’s secretary of the National Assembly’s Political Affairs Committee, confirmed what was discussed in the meeting, stating, “The controversial issue of who will issue stablecoins has been resolved in a ‘consortium format’ by coordinating the positions of the Bank of Korea, the Financial Services Commission, and the banking industry.”

South Korea’s regulatory and political deadline

Lawmakers went on to impose a deadline on the government, demanding that the government submit a draft bill containing the main framework by December 10. 

Kang stated that “if the government proposal is not submitted by this deadline, we will push forward with legislation initiated by lawmakers through the Political Affairs Committee.”

According to statements made by Kang, lawmakers are going to quickly share and propose the finalized bill and then go through a public debate process with the Digital Asset Task Force within the Democratic Party.

He stated, “Even if discussions are possible within this year, the actual passage of the bill will likely happen in January next year. I am not sure what the opposition (People Power Party) thinks, but the discussion process seems likely to take some time.”

Diverging views as consortium plan is not yet finalized

Last month, the country’s central bank, Bank of Korea (BOK), warned that non-bank stablecoin issuers could threaten monetary policy, deposit-protection frameworks, and financial stability. 

It argues that such entities would essentially be acting like narrow banks, where they issue currency and also offer payment services. It seems the consortium arrangement is an answer to the apex bank’s concerns. 

However, the stablecoin ecosystem, including some fintech advocates and industry stakeholders, says that limiting issuance to banks may hinder innovation and competition. 

They argue that strictly bank-dominated stablecoin issuance would reduce such coins to little more than digital bank deposits, impacting potential use cases, from cross-border payments to decentralized finance applications.

Moreover, even after the December 1 meeting, the FSC issued a statement noting that “no decision had been finalized” regarding the consortium plan, indicating that the regulatory framework is yet to get the consensus of all parties involved. Attention will now be on the government’s response to the ultimatum the lawmakers have given it.

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip

Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip

The post Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gold is strutting its way into record territory, smashing through $3,700 an ounce Wednesday morning, as Sprott Asset Management strategist Paul Wong says the yellow metal may finally snatch the dollar’s most coveted role: store of value. Wong Warns: Fiscal Dominance Puts U.S. Dollar on Notice, Gold on Top Gold prices eased slightly to $3,678.9 […] Source: https://news.bitcoin.com/gold-hits-3700-as-sprotts-wong-says-dollars-store-of-value-crown-may-slip/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:33
DeFi Leaders Raise Alarm Over Market Structure Bill’s Shaky Future

DeFi Leaders Raise Alarm Over Market Structure Bill’s Shaky Future

US Senate Postpones Markup of Digital Asset Market Clarity Act Amid Industry Concerns The proposed Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY) in the U.S. Senate
Share
Crypto Breaking News2026/01/17 06:20