Apple just got hit with a major legal blow in Europe. On Tuesday, the EU’s top court said the company can be sued in the Netherlands for antitrust damages tied to its App Store practices. That decision opens the door for a massive €637 million claim filed by two Dutch consumer groups: Right to Consumer […]Apple just got hit with a major legal blow in Europe. On Tuesday, the EU’s top court said the company can be sued in the Netherlands for antitrust damages tied to its App Store practices. That decision opens the door for a massive €637 million claim filed by two Dutch consumer groups: Right to Consumer […]

EU court clears Dutch lawsuit seeking €637 million in App Store antitrust damages against Apple

Apple just got hit with a major legal blow in Europe. On Tuesday, the EU’s top court said the company can be sued in the Netherlands for antitrust damages tied to its App Store practices.

That decision opens the door for a massive €637 million claim filed by two Dutch consumer groups: Right to Consumer Justice and App Stores Claims. The groups argue that Apple’s app commission fees were abusive and unfairly hiked costs for millions of users.

The lawsuit, which focuses on Apple’s 30% cut on in-app purchases, targets the company’s alleged dominance and how it charges developers using its system.

According to lawyer Rogier Meijer from the law firm Hausfeld, who’s repping App Stores Claims, the estimated damage covers seven million iPhone users and seven million iPad users. That’s 14 million Dutch users in total.

“On the basis of the available information, in the writ of summons the damage… was estimated at around €637 million (including statutory interest),” Rogier said.

Dutch court allowed to proceed after Apple challenged jurisdiction

Apple had tried to block the case by arguing that Dutch courts had no right to handle it. The company said the alleged harm didn’t happen in the Netherlands. But the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) completely rejected that.

The judges ruled that since the App Store is localized for Dutch users, using the Dutch language and linking to Dutch Apple IDs, the impact was tied directly to the Netherlands.

“The damage allegedly suffered when purchases are made in that virtual space can therefore occur in that territory, irrespective of the place where the users concerned were situated at the time of the purchase,” the judges said.

That statement confirmed that territorial jurisdiction belonged to the Dutch court, and that international jurisdiction was valid, too.

The two consumer foundations behind the case accuse Apple of abusing its dominant position and charging app makers excessive fees, which they claim was illegal. They say those fees were passed down to users, which inflated prices for millions of Dutch customers.

The CJEU’s ruling came after a Dutch court asked the Luxembourg-based court for clarity on whether such a damages claim could go forward.

Now that the green light has been given, the full hearing on the substance of the lawsuit is expected to take place in the Netherlands by Q1 2026, according to Rogier.

If the Dutch court sides with the foundations, it could result in one of the biggest damages payouts Apple has ever faced in Europe.

The lawsuit is now locked in, and Apple will have to defend its App Store fee model in front of a Dutch judge.

Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.

Market Opportunity
RWAX Logo
RWAX Price(APP)
$0,0002413
$0,0002413$0,0002413
+0,87%
USD
RWAX (APP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
LMAX Group Deepens Ripple Partnership With RLUSD Collateral Rollout

LMAX Group Deepens Ripple Partnership With RLUSD Collateral Rollout

LMAX Group has revealed a multi-year partnership with Ripple to integrate traditional finance with digital asset markets. As part of the agreement, LMAX will introduce
Share
Tronweekly2026/01/16 23:00
Pastor Involved in High-Stakes Crypto Fraud

Pastor Involved in High-Stakes Crypto Fraud

A gripping tale of deception has captured the media’s spotlight, especially in foreign outlets, centering on a cryptocurrency fraud case from Denver, Colorado. Eli Regalado, a pastor, alongside his wife Kaitlyn, was convicted, but what makes this case particularly intriguing is their unconventional defense.Continue Reading:Pastor Involved in High-Stakes Crypto Fraud
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:38