Bitcoin’s drop triggered a –4.45 Z-score on Binance, signaling severe market distortion driven by billions in forced liquidations.Bitcoin’s drop triggered a –4.45 Z-score on Binance, signaling severe market distortion driven by billions in forced liquidations.

Worst Signal on Record? What the Z-Score Crash Means for BTC’s Price

Yesterday, Bitcoin (BTC) dipped below $84,000, wiping out billions of dollars in leveraged positions in only a matter of hours.

The plunge also marked one of the cryptocurrency’s biggest distortions on record over one day, with Binance data showing a –4.45 Z-score spike, which is an extremely rare reading that points to severe market imbalance.

Volatility Spikes as Binance Metrics Show Rare –4.45 Z-Score

Data shared by Arab Chain highlighted a sharp swing in market conditions on Binance, where Bitcoin briefly dipped toward $83,500 following quick rallies and equally fast retracements. The platform’s analyst described the –4.45 Z-score captured within the exchange’s models as abnormal behavior.

Furthermore, according to them, Binance’s 24-hour change rate sat near –3.4%, while the daily standard deviation jumped, signaling an increase in volatility after several days of relative calm around the $89,000 to $91,000 region.

One of the catalysts, as noted by other market technicians at XWIN Research Japan, was a sudden shift in expectations for the Bank of Japan (BOJ). There had been lots of speculation on Monday that Governor Kazuo Ueda could signal a December interest rate hike, triggering a rapid appreciation of the Japanese Yen.

This started a swift unwind of the popular Yen carry trade, where investors borrow in low-yielding currencies to invest in higher-yielding assets like cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin, typically one of the first assets to react to liquidity shifts, fell quickly as funding rates turned negative and open interest shrank from the low-$30 billion area to about $27 billion.

The Critical Line Holding Back a Deeper Cycle Breakdown

While leveraged washouts dominate the short-term picture, some on-chain analysts are pointing to a longer-term support level that could determine the cycle’s health.

According to one of them, Crazzyblockk, the behavior of those who bought BTC between 12 and 18 months ago is often a reliable indicator of market strength. Data shows that they currently have a collective cost basis of approximately $70,000, meaning their position will remain profitable as long as BTC holds above that level.

This, Crazzyblockk says, is good for the rest of the market as staying above that group’s cost basis provides structural stability. The expert suggested that the foundational support zone is all that separates a steep correction from becoming a full cycle reversal.

If the asset falls below that level, it could see more severe bearish phases similar to those that happened in 2018 and 2022.

Furthermore, the late-November price drop into the low-$80,000s may have created a durable area of buyer interest. Recent analysis from Glassnode indicated that the move formed one of 2025’s densest cost-basis clusters, potentially establishing a strong accumulation zone near $80,000.

The post Worst Signal on Record? What the Z-Score Crash Means for BTC’s Price appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Market Opportunity
Bitcoin Logo
Bitcoin Price(BTC)
$95,413.32
$95,413.32$95,413.32
+0.87%
USD
Bitcoin (BTC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

XRPL Validator Reveals Why He Just Vetoed New Amendment

XRPL Validator Reveals Why He Just Vetoed New Amendment

Vet has explained that he has decided to veto the Token Escrow amendment to prevent breaking things
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:28
Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment

Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment

The post Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Amazon AI Agent: Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment Skip to content Home AI News Amazon AI Agent: Unleashing a New Era of Seller Empowerment Source: https://bitcoinworld.co.in/amazon-ai-seller-tools/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:10
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28