American firms are now rushing to grab rare earth minerals from Europe, even though China and the US officially agreed to stop fighting over this stuff for a year. Doesn’t matter. Beijing still blocks sales to anyone linked to defense, and they’re holding the strings on global supply. That’s made whatever rare earths are left […]American firms are now rushing to grab rare earth minerals from Europe, even though China and the US officially agreed to stop fighting over this stuff for a year. Doesn’t matter. Beijing still blocks sales to anyone linked to defense, and they’re holding the strings on global supply. That’s made whatever rare earths are left […]

U.S. firms race to seize Europe’s rare earths as Beijing tightens defense-linked supply

2025/12/02 23:40
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

American firms are now rushing to grab rare earth minerals from Europe, even though China and the US officially agreed to stop fighting over this stuff for a year. Doesn’t matter.

Beijing still blocks sales to anyone linked to defense, and they’re holding the strings on global supply. That’s made whatever rare earths are left outside China a whole lot more valuable, and short-lived. Some folks in the industry say Europe could run out of usable stock in just a few months.

While Europe’s arms industry is still arguing over how to buy these materials, US buyers are moving fast and emptying warehouses across the continent.

They’re not waiting on paperwork. They’re taking what they need and leaving the locals behind. And they’re doing it with full coordination from suppliers, clear logistics, and straight-up government help.

Americans strike fast while Europe dithers

Tim Borgschulte, CFO at Berlin-based Noble Elements, put it this way: “If we look at how long it takes us on average to sell, say, a ton of terbium to a European partner, we’re talking about three to four weeks; with the Americans it’s more like three to four days.”

That speed is now showing up everywhere. Rare earths like terbium, neodymium, dysprosium, you name it, are getting snapped up by US defense companies at a pace European buyers can’t match. Why? Simple.

According to Jan Giese from Frankfurt-based Tradium GmbH, US firms are using their cash and clout to lock in contracts far upstream in the supply chain. They’re buying early and shielding suppliers from Chinese retaliation by keeping deals low-key. That gives them two things Europe lacks: materials and control.

Meanwhile, European defense contractors are trying to buy direct. No middlemen. No supplier support. And barely any planning. Borgschulte said many of his European clients don’t even know what type or quantity of rare earths they need until the very last second. That leads to rushed deals, shortfalls, and high prices.

Giese summed it up: “The Americans have a sense of urgency, a financial might and people with both mandates and expertise making decisions, all of which are things that Europe is sorely lacking.”

And it’s not just words. A source at a major German defense company said their US rivals have already stripped most of the market clean. What’s left is expensive and scarce. Chinese materials sold before April 2025, before the defense export ban kicked in, were the last to move freely. Now, everything’s tight, and turnover is so fast no one can even track how much is out there.

Europe responds with rules, cash, and missed chances

The US government owns a stake in MP Materials, which runs the only rare earths mine in America. On top of that, the Department of Defense guarantees a minimum purchase price for ten years, shielding MP from market chaos. That’s what real backing looks like.

On the other side, the EU is still writing up frameworks. It passed the Critical Raw Materials Act in 2024 and is about to launch RESourceEU, a program meant to reduce dependence on China by building supply chains elsewhere. Germany’s state development bank, KfW, launched a €1 billion fund to support raw materials investment last year. But so far, the private sector hasn’t felt much of that support.

Armin Papperger, CEO of Rheinmetall AG, said his company is doing weekly stress tests on raw materials. He admitted that the automotive arm (surprisingly, not defense) faces more problems since it needs more rare earths.

“We have billions in our stock at the moment,” he said. But not everyone’s Rheinmetall. Smaller firms can’t afford to hoard materials or risk getting stuck with unused inventory.

Hans Christoph Atzpodien, who leads Germany’s defense industry association, pushed back on claims that Europe was caught unprepared. He said mining isn’t the real bottleneck, it’s processing.

Europe, including Germany, has rare earths underground. But they’ve always outsourced refining to China. That’s now backfiring. Processing these minerals creates toxic waste and needs tech that most EU countries just don’t have.

In France, companies have called retirees back to work to bring back forgotten skills. Germany is also talking to Canada about teaming up on a submarine deal that would include investments in Canadian mining. Canada’s got over 15 million tonnes of rare earth reserves.

But it’s still not enough. Thorsten Benner from the Global Public Policy Institute said the whole continent needs to act like it’s in crisis mode. “It has to be: ‘Whatever it takes’ — just like in the Euro crisis,” he said.

Right now, though, the only ones acting like it’s urgent are on the other side of the Atlantic.

Get up to $30,050 in trading rewards when you join Bybit today

Market Opportunity
Union Logo
Union Price(U)
$0.0009261
$0.0009261$0.0009261
-6.46%
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Why Localization Services Matter for Software Companies

Why Localization Services Matter for Software Companies

Rarely does software designed for one market translate smoothly to another. The most obvious obstacle is language, but it’s not the only one. Before a product feels
Share
Techbullion2026/03/25 19:10
₹71L CoinDCX Fraud Case Turns, Court Finds No Link to Founders

₹71L CoinDCX Fraud Case Turns, Court Finds No Link to Founders

Court grants bail to CoinDCX founders after ₹71L scam traced to fake site; no link found, funds recovered, platform secure. The court granted bail to CoinDCX founders
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2026/03/25 19:43
UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

The post UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. British crypto holders may soon face a very different landscape as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) moves to expand its regulatory reach in the industry. A new consultation paper outlines how the watchdog intends to apply its rulebook to crypto firms, shaping everything from asset safeguarding to trading platform operation. According to the financial regulator, these proposals would translate into clearer protections for retail investors and stricter oversight of crypto firms. UK FCA plans Until now, UK crypto users mostly encountered the FCA through rules on promotions and anti-money laundering checks. The consultation paper goes much further. It proposes direct oversight of stablecoin issuers, custodians, and crypto-asset trading platforms (CATPs). For investors, that means the wallets, exchanges, and coins they rely on could soon be subject to the same governance and resilience standards as traditional financial institutions. The regulator has also clarified that firms need official authorization before serving customers. This condition should, in theory, reduce the risk of sudden platform failures or unclear accountability. David Geale, the FCA’s executive director of payments and digital finance, said the proposals are designed to strike a balance between innovation and protection. He explained: “We want to develop a sustainable and competitive crypto sector – balancing innovation, market integrity and trust.” Geale noted that while the rules will not eliminate investment risks, they will create consistent standards, helping consumers understand what to expect from registered firms. Why does this matter for crypto holders? The UK regulatory framework shift would provide safer custody of assets, better disclosure of risks, and clearer recourse if something goes wrong. However, the regulator was also frank in its submission, arguing that no rulebook can eliminate the volatility or inherent risks of holding digital assets. Instead, the focus is on ensuring that when consumers choose to invest, they do…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:52