TLDR Garlinghouse supported Sacks, calling the NYT article misleading and unfair. NYT claimed Sacks used his role to benefit tech interests. Sacks denies all allegations and released a legal letter disputing the story. Four tech leaders criticized NYT’s reporting as politically motivated and biased. Brad Garlinghouse, CEO of Ripple, voiced support for David Sacks after [...] The post Ripple Ceo Brad Garlinghouse Calls Out New York Times Over David Sacks Allegations appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR Garlinghouse supported Sacks, calling the NYT article misleading and unfair. NYT claimed Sacks used his role to benefit tech interests. Sacks denies all allegations and released a legal letter disputing the story. Four tech leaders criticized NYT’s reporting as politically motivated and biased. Brad Garlinghouse, CEO of Ripple, voiced support for David Sacks after [...] The post Ripple Ceo Brad Garlinghouse Calls Out New York Times Over David Sacks Allegations appeared first on CoinCentral.

Ripple Ceo Brad Garlinghouse Calls Out New York Times Over David Sacks Allegations

2025/12/02 22:16
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

TLDR

  • Garlinghouse supported Sacks, calling the NYT article misleading and unfair.
  • NYT claimed Sacks used his role to benefit tech interests.

  • Sacks denies all allegations and released a legal letter disputing the story.

  • Four tech leaders criticized NYT’s reporting as politically motivated and biased.


Brad Garlinghouse, CEO of Ripple, voiced support for David Sacks after a New York Times article questioned Sacks’ conduct as the White House AI and crypto adviser. In a post on X, Garlinghouse called out the paper for allegedly ignoring clear evidence that contradicted its story.

He responded to a thread by Jason Calacanis, who also defended Sacks and claimed the investigation found no wrongdoing. “Finally, I found something that Jason and I agree on,” Garlinghouse wrote, referring to what he described as a “shameful” headline by the NYT.

Sacks has served in a high-profile advisory role under the current administration, working on digital asset and AI policy. The article suggested Sacks used this position to benefit personal investments in crypto and AI startups, but both he and his supporters argue there is no evidence to support these claims.

David Sacks Rejects All Allegations in Detailed Response

David Sacks addressed the allegations in a long statement on X, calling the story a “nothing burger.” He claimed five New York Times reporters spent months pursuing what he described as false accusations. These included suggestions that he influenced policy to benefit his associates and companies in his portfolio.

The article titled “Silicon Valley’s Man in the White House Is Benefiting Himself and His Friends” raised questions about Sacks’ role in easing export controls on chips, his support for specific legislation, and his involvement in private deals. Sacks denied all allegations and posted a letter from legal firm Clare Locke, which he hired to manage communications with the NYT during the reporting process.

He stated that every time one claim was disproved, the newspaper shifted focus to a new topic. Sacks argued that the story relied on anecdotes that did not support its headline and criticized the outlet for refusing to adjust its framing even after receiving detailed rebuttals.

Industry Voices Push Back Against NYT Story

Several high-profile figures in the tech and crypto industries also expressed concern about the article. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong called the NYT a “political propaganda machine,” while praising specific segments of the outlet such as Dealbook for maintaining journalistic standards.

Jason Calacanis, who co-hosts the All-In podcast with Sacks, listed multiple reasons why he believes the article was misleading. He noted that the podcast reportedly lost money on events that supported political causes and highlighted that Sacks had divested 99% of holdings tied to his public role.

Calacanis described Sacks as a “by-the-book” figure and suggested that the investigation found no substantial wrongdoing. These statements were echoed by Garlinghouse, who appeared to share their frustration with the article’s conclusions.

Scrutiny Continues as Crypto Policy Gains Attention

The NYT article also noted that Sacks’ government position boosted the visibility of his podcast and that some of his portfolio companies stood to benefit from policies he supported. These claims have drawn broader attention due to the growing role of AI and crypto regulation in Washington.

Critics of the NYT piece argue that it lacked context and downplayed Sacks’ divestments and compliance efforts. Supporters also believe the article failed to acknowledge ongoing regulatory changes under the current administration, which may have led to misinterpretation of routine government actions.

As of now, no formal inquiry or regulatory investigation has been announced related to the article’s claims. However, the public exchange between Sacks, Garlinghouse, and other leaders has intensified discussion about media responsibility in covering emerging tech policy.

The post Ripple Ceo Brad Garlinghouse Calls Out New York Times Over David Sacks Allegations appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Why Localization Services Matter for Software Companies

Why Localization Services Matter for Software Companies

Rarely does software designed for one market translate smoothly to another. The most obvious obstacle is language, but it’s not the only one. Before a product feels
Share
Techbullion2026/03/25 19:10
₹71L CoinDCX Fraud Case Turns, Court Finds No Link to Founders

₹71L CoinDCX Fraud Case Turns, Court Finds No Link to Founders

Court grants bail to CoinDCX founders after ₹71L scam traced to fake site; no link found, funds recovered, platform secure. The court granted bail to CoinDCX founders
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2026/03/25 19:43
UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

The post UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. British crypto holders may soon face a very different landscape as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) moves to expand its regulatory reach in the industry. A new consultation paper outlines how the watchdog intends to apply its rulebook to crypto firms, shaping everything from asset safeguarding to trading platform operation. According to the financial regulator, these proposals would translate into clearer protections for retail investors and stricter oversight of crypto firms. UK FCA plans Until now, UK crypto users mostly encountered the FCA through rules on promotions and anti-money laundering checks. The consultation paper goes much further. It proposes direct oversight of stablecoin issuers, custodians, and crypto-asset trading platforms (CATPs). For investors, that means the wallets, exchanges, and coins they rely on could soon be subject to the same governance and resilience standards as traditional financial institutions. The regulator has also clarified that firms need official authorization before serving customers. This condition should, in theory, reduce the risk of sudden platform failures or unclear accountability. David Geale, the FCA’s executive director of payments and digital finance, said the proposals are designed to strike a balance between innovation and protection. He explained: “We want to develop a sustainable and competitive crypto sector – balancing innovation, market integrity and trust.” Geale noted that while the rules will not eliminate investment risks, they will create consistent standards, helping consumers understand what to expect from registered firms. Why does this matter for crypto holders? The UK regulatory framework shift would provide safer custody of assets, better disclosure of risks, and clearer recourse if something goes wrong. However, the regulator was also frank in its submission, arguing that no rulebook can eliminate the volatility or inherent risks of holding digital assets. Instead, the focus is on ensuring that when consumers choose to invest, they do…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:52