The post Poland’s President Vetoes Crypto Bill, Sparking Major Political Clash appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Poland is facing a heated political clash after President Karol Nawrocki refused to approve a major crypto regulation bill, triggering celebrations in the digital asset community and sharp criticism within the government. The announcement, made Monday, quickly became one of the year’s most divisive policy moments. President Calls Bill a “Dangerous Overreach” The rejected proposal, …The post Poland’s President Vetoes Crypto Bill, Sparking Major Political Clash appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Poland is facing a heated political clash after President Karol Nawrocki refused to approve a major crypto regulation bill, triggering celebrations in the digital asset community and sharp criticism within the government. The announcement, made Monday, quickly became one of the year’s most divisive policy moments. President Calls Bill a “Dangerous Overreach” The rejected proposal, …

Poland’s President Vetoes Crypto Bill, Sparking Major Political Clash

Poland crypto regulation veto

The post Poland’s President Vetoes Crypto Bill, Sparking Major Political Clash appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

Poland is facing a heated political clash after President Karol Nawrocki refused to approve a major crypto regulation bill, triggering celebrations in the digital asset community and sharp criticism within the government. The announcement, made Monday, quickly became one of the year’s most divisive policy moments.

President Calls Bill a “Dangerous Overreach”

The rejected proposal, known as the Crypto-Asset Market Act, aimed to introduce some of the toughest crypto rules in the region. But Nawrocki said the legislation went too far, warning it could threaten personal freedoms and destabilize Poland’s financial system. His office described the bill as “a real threat to civic rights, property autonomy, and institutional balance.”

One of the biggest concerns was a clause that allowed authorities to quickly block websites linked to digital asset services. The president’s team criticized the provision as vague, easily misused, and open to arbitrary censorship.

Nawrocki also pointed to the bill’s overwhelming complexity. At several hundred pages, critics said it was far more complicated than the rules in nearby countries such as Slovakia, Hungary, and the Czech Republic. He warned that such heavy-handed regulation would push Polish crypto innovators to friendlier markets like Lithuania or Malta.

Innovation vs. Restriction

The president further objected to what he called “punitive” supervisory fees, arguing they would harm Polish crypto startups and give foreign banks and large corporations an unfair advantage. He insisted the law could undermine Poland’s tech competitiveness at a critical moment for the industry.

Crypto industry leaders welcomed the veto, saying Nawrocki stopped rules that could have slowed the domestic market and stifled innovation.

  • Also Read :
  •   Crypto Regulation News: FDIC to Release Stablecoin Rules Under GENIUS Act This Week
  •   ,

Government Fires Back: “This Is Chaos”

The decision sparked an immediate backlash. Finance Minister Andrzej Domański accused the president of choosing “chaos over accountability,” arguing that weak oversight already leaves many Poles vulnerable to fraud. He warned that Nawrocki must “bear the consequences” of blocking stronger protections.

Deputy Prime Minister Radosław Sikorski added that the bill was designed to safeguard citizens. If market turmoil occurs, he said, “Poles will know exactly where to point the finger.”

Peter Boris also criticized the veto, noting that Poland is now the only EU country without proper protections against crypto fraud. He compared the situation to the past SKOKi scandal and stressed that the bill would have placed the crypto sector under the supervision of Poland’s financial regulator, oversight now missing.

Meanwhile, economists noted that the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) will introduce bloc-wide investor safeguards by mid-2026, which they believe should ease regulatory pressure on Poland for now.

Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!

Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.

bell icon Subscribe to News

FAQs

What was Poland’s crypto bill and why was it rejected?

Poland’s president vetoed the Crypto-Asset Market Act, calling it an overreach that threatened personal freedoms and could drive innovation abroad due to its complexity and harsh fees.

How does Poland’s crypto veto affect investors and users?

For now, Poland’s crypto market remains under its existing, less strict rules. Users lack new fraud protections, but EU-wide regulations (MiCA) are set to provide safeguards by 2026.

Is crypto legal in Poland after the veto?

Yes, crypto remains legal. The veto only stopped a new, stricter regulatory bill. The current legal framework continues to apply until new legislation is passed or EU rules take effect.

What’s next for crypto regulation in Poland?

The government may revise the rejected bill. However, significant EU regulations (MiCA) will apply in 2026, which may reduce pressure for a standalone Polish law in the interim.

Market Opportunity
Major Logo
Major Price(MAJOR)
$0.12404
$0.12404$0.12404
+0.30%
USD
Major (MAJOR) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

XRPL Validator Reveals Why He Just Vetoed New Amendment

XRPL Validator Reveals Why He Just Vetoed New Amendment

Vet has explained that he has decided to veto the Token Escrow amendment to prevent breaking things
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:28
Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment

Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment

The post Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Amazon AI Agent: Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment Skip to content Home AI News Amazon AI Agent: Unleashing a New Era of Seller Empowerment Source: https://bitcoinworld.co.in/amazon-ai-seller-tools/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:10
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28