Key Takeaways Benchmark says fears about Strategy’s financial collapse are exaggerated and emotionally driven. The company’s Bitcoin-leveraged balance sheet is […] The post Strategy Panic Is Misleading – Benchmark Says the Balance Sheet Is Built for Volatility appeared first on Coindoo.Key Takeaways Benchmark says fears about Strategy’s financial collapse are exaggerated and emotionally driven. The company’s Bitcoin-leveraged balance sheet is […] The post Strategy Panic Is Misleading – Benchmark Says the Balance Sheet Is Built for Volatility appeared first on Coindoo.

Strategy Panic Is Misleading – Benchmark Says the Balance Sheet Is Built for Volatility

2025/12/02 18:00
Key Takeaways
  • Benchmark says fears about Strategy’s financial collapse are exaggerated and emotionally driven.
  • The company’s Bitcoin-leveraged balance sheet is functioning as intended despite market volatility.
  • Analysts state that a true risk only exists if BTC falls near $12,700 for an extended period — a scenario they view as highly improbable.

Rumors of financial instability spread quickly after the latest BTC correction, prompting dramatic speculation online. Wall Street, however, isn’t buying the panic.

Benchmark Says Panic Is “Cycle Noise”

Benchmark, one of the first major brokers to respond, says the fear is built on emotion rather than math. In its newest research note, the firm argues that the company’s foundation remains untouched and that every sharp Bitcoin downturn invites the same exaggerated reaction cycle.

Benchmark’s lead analyst Mark Palmer criticized what he described as a “bankruptcy fantasy narrative,” warning that critics are confusing short-term volatility with structural threat. He emphasized that Strategy’s balance sheet wasn’t designed around minimizing leverage like a traditional firm — but around amplifying Bitcoin exposure using a framework engineered for long-term cycles.

Balance Sheet Architecture Built for BTC Exposure

Strategy is currently holding roughly 649,870 BTC, a trove valued at around $55.8 billion as of now. That position is supported by two capital pillars: $8.2 billion in convertible notes issued at exceptionally low rates and $7.6 billion in perpetual preferred stock. Unlike standard debt, perpetual preferreds place no looming repayment deadline on the company, which, according to Benchmark, is precisely why the market narrative about imminent insolvency makes no sense.

READ MORE:

Bitcoin Rally Loses Momentum – What Traders Should Expect Next

The report called the ownership structure a competitive advantage rather than a liability. Few digital-asset corporations can retain enormous Bitcoin exposure without aggressive refinancing needs — Strategy can, and Benchmark says that difference is being ignored in favor of alarmist headlines.

The Myth of the “Crisis Level”

One talking point especially irritated the brokerage: the frequently cited “crisis level” that influencers have been promoting online. Benchmark says the only realistic threat zone begins near $12,700 per BTC and would require Bitcoin to stay there for an extended duration. The firm described that scenario as nearly impossible without an 86% collapse in an environment dominated by institutional capital.

In Benchmark’s view, the social-media panic remains the same every cycle. Bitcoin falls, speculation turns dramatic, the topic of liquidation resurfaces, and then fundamentals eventually drown out the noise. For now, the brokerage maintains that Strategy’s financial architecture is functioning exactly as intended.


The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Coindoo.com does not endorse or recommend any specific investment strategy or cryptocurrency. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

The post Strategy Panic Is Misleading – Benchmark Says the Balance Sheet Is Built for Volatility appeared first on Coindoo.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

XRPL Validator Reveals Why He Just Vetoed New Amendment

XRPL Validator Reveals Why He Just Vetoed New Amendment

Vet has explained that he has decided to veto the Token Escrow amendment to prevent breaking things
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:28
Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment

Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment

The post Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Amazon AI Agent: Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment Skip to content Home AI News Amazon AI Agent: Unleashing a New Era of Seller Empowerment Source: https://bitcoinworld.co.in/amazon-ai-seller-tools/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:10
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28