House Report Suggests Biden Policies Pressured Banks to Limit Crypto Access

Operation Choke Point 2.0 refers to regulatory actions by the Biden Administration that pressured banks to sever ties with crypto firms, documented in a 51-page House Republican report released on December 1. At least 30 digital asset entities lost banking access from 2022 to 2024 through FDIC pause letters and supervisory guidance.

• Biden-era regulators issued pause letters to 24 banks, halting crypto services and requiring extensive documentation.

• Impacted companies included major players like Coinbase and smaller startups, leading to layoffs and operational challenges.

• The Trump Administration reversed these policies in 2025, rescinding key guidance like SAB 121 and establishing stablecoin frameworks.

Discover how Operation Choke Point 2.0 targeted crypto firms, debanking 30+ entities via Biden regulators. Explore Trump reversals and future legislation for a clearer path forward in digital assets.

What is Operation Choke Point 2.0?

Operation Choke Point 2.0 describes a series of informal regulatory pressures exerted by Biden Administration agencies on banks to limit services to cryptocurrency businesses. A 51-page report from House Republicans, released on December 1, details how the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and other regulators used supervisory tools to effectively debank digital asset firms without formal rulemaking. Between 2022 and 2024, at least 30 crypto entities and individuals faced account closures, disrupting industry operations and innovation.

How Did Pause Letters Contribute to Operation Choke Point 2.0?

The FDIC’s pause letters formed a core element of Operation Choke Point 2.0, targeting approximately 24 banks engaged in crypto-related activities. These letters, publicly released in February 2025, instructed institutions to suspend new digital asset services and pause ongoing reviews until regulators received comprehensive documentation. According to the House Financial Services Committee report, this created significant barriers, making it nearly impossible for banks to continue without risking supervisory scrutiny.

Supporting evidence includes internal policy documents and Federal Reserve guidance, such as letters requiring non-objection approvals before any crypto involvement. The report highlights that these measures echoed the original Operation Choke Point from 2013, which targeted high-risk industries through informal pressure rather than legislation. Industry data shows that such actions led to widespread account terminations, often with minimal notice, affecting entities from large exchanges to emerging blockchain projects.

Experts, including former regulators cited in the report, noted that tools like Supervisory Letter SR 22-6 and SR 23-8, along with Interpretive Letter 1179, amplified these effects by introducing heightened risk assessments for crypto exposures. The SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin 121 further complicated custody of digital assets for banks, as it required insurers to consolidate crypto holdings on balance sheets, deterring participation. Overall, these non-binding yet influential directives resulted in a chilling effect on the sector, with banks prioritizing compliance over innovation.

Quantitative impacts underscore the severity: Anchorage Digital, a key institutional crypto custodian, reduced its workforce by 20% in 2023 after losing banking partnerships. Smaller startups reported scrambling for alternative funding, with some halting payroll due to sudden access denials. The report compiles evidence from multiple agencies, demonstrating a coordinated approach that bypassed congressional oversight.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Were the Main Impacts of Operation Choke Point 2.0 on Crypto Firms?

Operation Choke Point 2.0 led to debanking for at least 30 digital asset companies and individuals from 2022 to 2024, affecting operations across the board. Firms like Coinbase, Marathon Digital Holdings, and founders of Uniswap, Ripple, and Gemini lost essential banking services, resulting in layoffs, delayed payments, and restricted growth. Banks often provided 24-72 hours notice or none at all, forcing rapid adaptations in a volatile market.

How Has the Trump Administration Addressed Operation Choke Point 2.0 Policies?

Since January 2025, the Trump Administration has actively reversed Biden-era crypto restrictions linked to Operation Choke Point 2.0. Actions include rescinding SAB 121 to ease asset custody, withdrawing Federal Reserve pre-approval requirements, and removing reputational risk from banking supervision criteria. The GENIUS Act, signed in July 2025, created the first federal stablecoin framework, while a Presidential Working Group on Digital Asset Markets promotes balanced regulation.

Key Takeaways

• Regulatory Pressure Exposed: House Republicans’ report details FDIC pause letters and supervisory guidance that debanked 30+ crypto entities during the Biden Administration.
• Industry-Wide Disruptions: Major firms like Coinbase and Anchorage Digital faced layoffs and operational halts due to sudden banking terminations.
• Policy Reversals Under Trump: Key actions like rescinding SAB 121 and passing the GENIUS Act signal a shift toward supportive crypto regulations.

Conclusion

The House Republicans’ 51-page report on Operation Choke Point 2.0 illuminates how Biden Administration regulators wielded supervisory tools to isolate crypto firms from traditional banking, impacting at least 30 entities through pause letters and guidance like SAB 121. With the Trump Administration’s reversals—including the GENIUS Act and elimination of reputational risk criteria—the digital asset sector anticipates a more stable environment. As Congress considers the CLARITY Act [H.R. 3633], which passed the House 294-136 in July 2025, stakeholders should monitor Senate progress to ensure comprehensive reforms that foster innovation while protecting consumers. Stay informed on evolving crypto regulations to navigate this dynamic landscape effectively.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/house-report-suggests-biden-policies-pressured-banks-to-limit-crypto-access