Buterin warns that token-based governance in Zcash could cause compromise long-term privacy and allow vote buying. Ethereum spends far more on network security than on development and public goods, as to ensuring potential long-term funding gaps. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has expressed strong reservations about a proposed shift to token-based governance in the Zcash community. [...]]]>Buterin warns that token-based governance in Zcash could cause compromise long-term privacy and allow vote buying. Ethereum spends far more on network security than on development and public goods, as to ensuring potential long-term funding gaps. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has expressed strong reservations about a proposed shift to token-based governance in the Zcash community. [...]]]>

Ethereum’s Vitalik Buterin Flags Risks of Vote Buying in Proposed Zcash Governance Model

  • Buterin warns that token-based governance in Zcash could cause compromise long-term privacy and allow vote buying.
  • Ethereum spends far more on network security than on development and public goods, as to ensuring potential long-term funding gaps.

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has expressed strong reservations about a proposed shift to token-based governance in the Zcash community. This warning rooted from his high priority on privacy for Real-World financial use sases, and that that this could potentially allow large holders to dominate decisions and enable vote buying, ultimately putting long-term privacy and civil liberties at risk.

For context, the Zcash Governance Model refers to the system by which decisions about funding, development, and network upgrades are made within the Zcash ecosystem.

According to the Zcash Foundation, their governance model relies on a small committee of appointed or elected members to review and approving funds proposals for network development, research, and community initiatives; while some view this structure as separate from the real-world outcomes, others argue it could actually help prevent risks like vote buying, despite of debate continues over whether it should be replaced by a token-based or market-driven system allowing ZEC holders to vote directly.

In his November 30 post on X, Buterin publicly saying that token voting would push decisions toward short-term price gains, undermining the civil-liberties goals the project originally stood for. He also noted:

Security has always been a top priority for the co-founder, as previously highlighted by his and the Ethereum Foundation’s introduction of Kohaku, a modular privacy setting designed to provide wallets with stronger built-in privacy without sacrificing compliance.

Ethereum Price Outlook on Governance Reforms

According to the Ethereum Roadmap, prior to The Merge (when Ethereum ran on Proof‑of‑Work), the network issued roughly 13,000 ETH per day in mining/block rewards. After the Merge, daily issuance dropped significantly (to under ~2,000 ETH/day, mainly via validator rewards).

While traders react to short-term price swings, Buterin emphasizes that these movements cannot be viewed in isolation from the underlying economic structure and governance mechanisms. As he put it:

This shows nevertheless, that Ethereum spends a lot on network security, digital privacy, but far less on long-term research, development, and public projects, which could affect investor confidence and the network’s resilience.

At the time of writing, Ethereum (ETH) is trading at $2,824.82, reflecting a 5.61% decrease over the past day and 1.21% in the past week. See ETH price chart below.

]]>
Market Opportunity
TokenFi Logo
TokenFi Price(TOKEN)
$0.004695
$0.004695$0.004695
-4.61%
USD
TokenFi (TOKEN) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Market data: ICP rose 4.54% intraday, while GLM fell 5.44% intraday.

Market data: ICP rose 4.54% intraday, while GLM fell 5.44% intraday.

PANews reported on January 16th that, according to OKX market data, the top gainers of the day are: ICP at $4.494, up 4.54%; CHZ at $0.0579, up 4.19%; CRV at $0
Share
PANews2026/01/16 10:00
Iran Crypto Volume Hits $7.78B as IRGC Controls Half of Market

Iran Crypto Volume Hits $7.78B as IRGC Controls Half of Market

The post Iran Crypto Volume Hits $7.78B as IRGC Controls Half of Market appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Darius Baruo Jan 15, 2026 15:54 Chainalysis data
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/16 10:16