Forget tokenomics and hype — what if the real clues to the market’s most disastrous altcoins were hidden in something as simple as where they originated?
Key Takeaways:
- Most of the collapsed, high-risk altcoins identified by Bubblemaps originated in the United States, with Europe a distant second.
- Almost every token examined lost between –97% and –100% of its value, regardless of region or theme.
- Bubblemaps’ data suggests that hype-driven meme tokens with concentrated wallet ownership consistently end in total capital wipeouts.
Bubblemaps has taken that angle, dissecting 38 tokens that became notorious for wallet clustering, opacity, and sudden implosions, and the findings paint a very uncomfortable picture for the crypto industry.Instead of a scattered global distribution, the majority of these failed tokens can be traced back to one dominant origin: the United States. Europe trails in second place, followed by India and a mix of smaller regions. The geography alone doesn’t explain the collapses — but it exposes just how concentrated the wave of high-risk, fast-burn meme coins really was.
Value Destruction on a Scale Too Large to Ignore
What shocked researchers wasn’t where the projects were located, but how uniformly they self-destructed. Across all 38 tokens:
- The least damaged asset is down –78%.
- The vast majority now sit between –97% and –100% — effectively worthless.
Many saw their entire market evaporate, with no signs of recovery.
Names like MELANIA, CR7 Fake, FRIES, ZEUS and others went from trending hype to microscopic valuations in record time. Several U.S.-launched tokens — including MTGA, RONNIE, FRENCH, DEGE, KING, MUVA, JASON, DAVIDO, JENNER — have reached a full –100% wipeout. Europe follows with tokens that suffered similar destruction, including LILPUMP, GINNAN, PUNDLE, 3AC, MORI, and more. India, Mexico, Canada, Australia, Thailand, Kenya, Malaysia, and the UAE are also represented across the wreckage.
A Pattern With No Outliers
Whether the tokens were marketed around celebrities, meme themes, politics, or viral personas, they all exhibited the same behavior: rapid rise, aggressive clustering of supply in a small set of wallets, and catastrophic decline. In other words, the branding changed — but the structural risk did not.
Bubblemaps did not issue warnings or recommendations, but the message beneath the data is obvious: attention and controversy can launch a token instantly, yet without transparency and diversified ownership, the fall is just as fast.
Investors encountering similar high-hype launches may want to pay attention to where projects originate, how supply is distributed, and who controls liquidity — because every token in this dataset collapsed long before the excitement disappeared from social media.
The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Coindoo.com does not endorse or recommend any specific investment strategy or cryptocurrency. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
AuthorRelated stories
Next article
Source: https://coindoo.com/over-half-of-the-markets-most-controversial-rugged-tokens-trace-back-to-the-u-s/
