Chainalysis, a blockchain security firm, has publicly responded to inquiries over an analysis conducted by crypto exchange Binance that used its data. In a November 17 blog post, Binance claimed data from Chainalysis and TRM Labs, another blockchain security firm, showed that only 0.018% to 0.023% of trading volume across the top seven biggest crypto exchanges — including itself — was directly linked to illicit crypto wallets. “Both analytics firms’ data suggest that Binance, the world’s largest digital-asset exchange, consistently outperforms the market in minimising exposure to illicit funds – despite handling far greater trading volumes than any other platform,” Binance said in the post. But that may not be the full picture.According to Chainalysis, Binance’s analysis did not appear to include all categories of illicit activity that Chainalysis tracks, such as funds coming from ransomware or stolen in hacks, and was only based on direct exposure only, Chainalysis said in a November 28 X post. “In other words, if an illicit entity sends funds to a personal wallet, and then that wallet sends funds to Binance, it is not included in this analysis,” Chainalysis said.Such wallet hopping strategies are widely used by crypto criminals attempting to cover their tracks, although security researchers can often still trace the movement of funds. Hacks are one of the largest sources of illicit crypto funds, with criminals stealing nearly $2.2 billion through the method last year, according to Chainalysis. Binance did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The exchange said it updated its blog post on November 19 to clarify that it conducted the analysis itself using Chainalysis and TRM Labs’ datasets, and to specify how direct illicit exposure was calculated based on Chainalysis data.Tough on crypto crimeChainalysis’ clarification comes as Binance attempts to signal to both regulators and the broader crypto industry that it is tough on crypto crime. In 2023, Binance admitted it engaged in anti-money laundering, unlicensed money transmitting, and sanctions violations, resulting in a $4.3 billion penalty. Changpeng Zhao, the firm’s CEO at the time, stepped down and was sentenced to four months in prison for failing to maintain an effective anti-money laundering programme, although he received a presidential pardon in October. The same month, victims of the October 7 attacks conducted by Hamas accused the exchange of aiding terrorists in a new lawsuit.Binance has repeatedly said that it cannot comment on any ongoing litigation, and that it complies fully with internationally recognised sanctions laws.Ari Redbord, global head of policy at TRM Labs, the other firm whose data Binance used in its analysis, told DL News the 0.018% figure cited in Binance’s release reflects a point-in-time analysis that his firm conducted on Binance’s activity for June 2025, and only covers direct exposure for a limited number of categories.“The number did not come from a public TRM report — it came from a custom dataset provided directly to Binance,” Redbord said. “We would defer to Binance on any interpretation, comparisons, or framing around that statistic.” Tim Craig is DL News’ Edinburgh-based DeFi Correspondent. Reach out with tips at tim@dlnews.com.Chainalysis, a blockchain security firm, has publicly responded to inquiries over an analysis conducted by crypto exchange Binance that used its data. In a November 17 blog post, Binance claimed data from Chainalysis and TRM Labs, another blockchain security firm, showed that only 0.018% to 0.023% of trading volume across the top seven biggest crypto exchanges — including itself — was directly linked to illicit crypto wallets. “Both analytics firms’ data suggest that Binance, the world’s largest digital-asset exchange, consistently outperforms the market in minimising exposure to illicit funds – despite handling far greater trading volumes than any other platform,” Binance said in the post. But that may not be the full picture.According to Chainalysis, Binance’s analysis did not appear to include all categories of illicit activity that Chainalysis tracks, such as funds coming from ransomware or stolen in hacks, and was only based on direct exposure only, Chainalysis said in a November 28 X post. “In other words, if an illicit entity sends funds to a personal wallet, and then that wallet sends funds to Binance, it is not included in this analysis,” Chainalysis said.Such wallet hopping strategies are widely used by crypto criminals attempting to cover their tracks, although security researchers can often still trace the movement of funds. Hacks are one of the largest sources of illicit crypto funds, with criminals stealing nearly $2.2 billion through the method last year, according to Chainalysis. Binance did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The exchange said it updated its blog post on November 19 to clarify that it conducted the analysis itself using Chainalysis and TRM Labs’ datasets, and to specify how direct illicit exposure was calculated based on Chainalysis data.Tough on crypto crimeChainalysis’ clarification comes as Binance attempts to signal to both regulators and the broader crypto industry that it is tough on crypto crime. In 2023, Binance admitted it engaged in anti-money laundering, unlicensed money transmitting, and sanctions violations, resulting in a $4.3 billion penalty. Changpeng Zhao, the firm’s CEO at the time, stepped down and was sentenced to four months in prison for failing to maintain an effective anti-money laundering programme, although he received a presidential pardon in October. The same month, victims of the October 7 attacks conducted by Hamas accused the exchange of aiding terrorists in a new lawsuit.Binance has repeatedly said that it cannot comment on any ongoing litigation, and that it complies fully with internationally recognised sanctions laws.Ari Redbord, global head of policy at TRM Labs, the other firm whose data Binance used in its analysis, told DL News the 0.018% figure cited in Binance’s release reflects a point-in-time analysis that his firm conducted on Binance’s activity for June 2025, and only covers direct exposure for a limited number of categories.“The number did not come from a public TRM report — it came from a custom dataset provided directly to Binance,” Redbord said. “We would defer to Binance on any interpretation, comparisons, or framing around that statistic.” Tim Craig is DL News’ Edinburgh-based DeFi Correspondent. Reach out with tips at tim@dlnews.com.

Chainalysis hits back at Binance over illicit crypto analysis that used its data

2025/11/30 01:11
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Chainalysis, a blockchain security firm, has publicly responded to inquiries over an analysis conducted by crypto exchange Binance that used its data.

In a November 17 blog post, Binance claimed data from Chainalysis and TRM Labs, another blockchain security firm, showed that only 0.018% to 0.023% of trading volume across the top seven biggest crypto exchanges — including itself — was directly linked to illicit crypto wallets.

“Both analytics firms’ data suggest that Binance, the world’s largest digital-asset exchange, consistently outperforms the market in minimising exposure to illicit funds – despite handling far greater trading volumes than any other platform,” Binance said in the post.

But that may not be the full picture.

According to Chainalysis, Binance’s analysis did not appear to include all categories of illicit activity that Chainalysis tracks, such as funds coming from ransomware or stolen in hacks, and was only based on direct exposure only, Chainalysis said in a November 28 X post.

“In other words, if an illicit entity sends funds to a personal wallet, and then that wallet sends funds to Binance, it is not included in this analysis,” Chainalysis said.

Such wallet hopping strategies are widely used by crypto criminals attempting to cover their tracks, although security researchers can often still trace the movement of funds.

Hacks are one of the largest sources of illicit crypto funds, with criminals stealing nearly $2.2 billion through the method last year, according to Chainalysis.

Binance did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The exchange said it updated its blog post on November 19 to clarify that it conducted the analysis itself using Chainalysis and TRM Labs’ datasets, and to specify how direct illicit exposure was calculated based on Chainalysis data.

Tough on crypto crime

Chainalysis’ clarification comes as Binance attempts to signal to both regulators and the broader crypto industry that it is tough on crypto crime.

In 2023, Binance admitted it engaged in anti-money laundering, unlicensed money transmitting, and sanctions violations, resulting in a $4.3 billion penalty.

Changpeng Zhao, the firm’s CEO at the time, stepped down and was sentenced to four months in prison for failing to maintain an effective anti-money laundering programme, although he received a presidential pardon in October.

The same month, victims of the October 7 attacks conducted by Hamas accused the exchange of aiding terrorists in a new lawsuit.

Binance has repeatedly said that it cannot comment on any ongoing litigation, and that it complies fully with internationally recognised sanctions laws.

Ari Redbord, global head of policy at TRM Labs, the other firm whose data Binance used in its analysis, told DL News the 0.018% figure cited in Binance’s release reflects a point-in-time analysis that his firm conducted on Binance’s activity for June 2025, and only covers direct exposure for a limited number of categories.

“The number did not come from a public TRM report — it came from a custom dataset provided directly to Binance,” Redbord said. “We would defer to Binance on any interpretation, comparisons, or framing around that statistic.”

Tim Craig is DL News’ Edinburgh-based DeFi Correspondent. Reach out with tips at tim@dlnews.com.

Market Opportunity
TOP Network Logo
TOP Network Price(TOP)
$0.0000697
$0.0000697$0.0000697
0.00%
USD
TOP Network (TOP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

What Happens to Bitcoin If US Bond Yields Soar Above 5%?

What Happens to Bitcoin If US Bond Yields Soar Above 5%?

The post What Happens to Bitcoin If US Bond Yields Soar Above 5%? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin (BTC) has been among the best-performing assets amid
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/25 00:09
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37
‘Clarity once and for all’ – White House reviews SEC’s new crypto framework

‘Clarity once and for all’ – White House reviews SEC’s new crypto framework

The post ‘Clarity once and for all’ – White House reviews SEC’s new crypto framework appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/25 00:30