According to the Swiss Federal Council and government sources, Switzerland will postpone the automatic exchange of cryptocurrency account data with foreign tax authorities until at least January 2027. Related Reading: $36 Million Gone: Solana Hack Strikes South Korea’s Top Exchange That means the country will still pass new rules next year, but the cross-border sharing […]According to the Swiss Federal Council and government sources, Switzerland will postpone the automatic exchange of cryptocurrency account data with foreign tax authorities until at least January 2027. Related Reading: $36 Million Gone: Solana Hack Strikes South Korea’s Top Exchange That means the country will still pass new rules next year, but the cross-border sharing […]

Swiss Holdoff: Crypto Tax Reporting Won’t Start Until 2027

2025/11/29 03:00
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

According to the Swiss Federal Council and government sources, Switzerland will postpone the automatic exchange of cryptocurrency account data with foreign tax authorities until at least January 2027.

That means the country will still pass new rules next year, but the cross-border sharing of crypto tax files will not start on schedule.

Delay Comes Despite Law Entering Into Force

Based on reports, the legal framework that brings crypto into the international tax reporting system is set to take effect on January 1, 2026.

Yet the step that actually lets Swiss authorities send data to other countries has been paused after a key parliamentary committee suspended its work on which partner states to include.

In practice, firms in Switzerland will face new domestic reporting duties in 2026, but the first round of international data swaps will wait until at least 2027.

Parliament Approved A List Of Partner States Earlier

Reports have disclosed that the Federal Council had previously prepared a list of 74 partner jurisdictions that would be eligible for automatic exchange under the OECD’s Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF).

That list was formalized in mid-2025, and it covers most EU member states plus the United Kingdom and other major economies that are ready to take part. But political talks and technical checks about reciprocity and rules have slowed the actual start of exchanges.

What Firms And Clients Will See

Crypto service providers in Switzerland will still need to register, carry out customer checks, and collect the information required by the CARF once the law is active.

Based on reports, that means exchanges and certain wallet providers must prepare files and be able to report holdings and transaction details when asked. For users, that makes holdings visible to tax authorities in partner countries once exchanges begin.

Major Countries Not Yet In The Initial Group

According to coverage of the issue, some big economies — for example the US, China and Saudi Arabia — are not included in the initial exchange group because they either have not aligned with CARF or do not have the necessary reciprocal agreements in place. That affects how broad the data sharing will be during the first year of exchanges.

Politics And Practical Checks Behind The Pause

Based on the Federal Council’s announcement and parliamentary notes, Swiss lawmakers and officials say they want to be sure the partner list meets legal and diplomatic standards before data leaves Swiss systems.

That has led the Economic Affairs and Taxation Committee to pause its deliberations while remaining issues are settled. The pause gives regulators time to double-check technical setups and the legal basis for exchanges.

Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.006534
$0.006534$0.006534
+1.95%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration

What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration

The post What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline Legal experts have raised concerns that ABC’s decision to pull “Jimmy Kimmel Live” from its airwaves following the host’s controversial comments about the death of Charlie Kirk, could be because the Trump administration violated free speech protections through a practice known as “jawboning.” Jimmy Kimmel speaks at Disney’s Advertising Upfront on May 13 in New York City. Disney via Getty Images Key Facts Disney-owned ABC announced Wednesday Kimmel’s show will be taken off the air “indefinitely,” which came after ABC affiliate owner Nexstar—which needs Federal Communications Commission approval to complete a planned acquisition of competitor Tegna Inc.—said it would not air the program due to Kimmel’s comments Monday regarding Kirk’s death and the reaction to it. The sudden move drew particular concern because it came only hours after FCC head Brendan Carr called for ABC to “take action” against Kimmel, and cryptically suggested his agency could take action saying, “We can do this the easy way or the hard way.” While ABC and Nexstar have not given any indication their decisions were influenced by Carr’s comments, the timing raised concerns among legal experts that the Trump administration’s threats may have unlawfully coerced ABC and Nexstar to punish Kimmel, which could constitute jawboning. Jawboning refers to “the use of official speech to inappropriately compel private action,” as defined by the Cato Institute, as governments or public officials—who cannot directly punish private actors for speech they don’t like—can use strongman tactics to try and indirectly silence critics or influence private companies’ actions. The practice is fairly loosely defined and there aren’t many legal safeguards dictating how violations of it are enforced, the Knight First Amendment Institute notes, but the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled it can be unlawful and an impermissible First Amendment violation when it involves specific threats. The White…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 07:17
Why Fintech Platforms Are Growing Faster Than Traditional Banks

Why Fintech Platforms Are Growing Faster Than Traditional Banks

Fintech platforms are outpacing traditional banks in growth across nearly every measurable dimension. Customer acquisition rates, revenue growth, geographic expansion
Share
Techbullion2026/03/24 07:58
Japan’s CPI Reveals Critical 1.3% Inflation Rise in February as Core Pressure Eases Unexpectedly

Japan’s CPI Reveals Critical 1.3% Inflation Rise in February as Core Pressure Eases Unexpectedly

BitcoinWorld Japan’s CPI Reveals Critical 1.3% Inflation Rise in February as Core Pressure Eases Unexpectedly TOKYO, Japan — March 2025: Japan’s National Consumer
Share
bitcoinworld2026/03/24 08:10