Democrats have issued a partisan report claiming President Trump used his position for crypto. Although he was long a crypto-skeptic, President Trump has taken action to establish regulatory policies. A new report was released on November 24 by the House Judiciary Committee Democrats, explaining how the administration of Donald J. Trump has exploited the powers [...]]]>Democrats have issued a partisan report claiming President Trump used his position for crypto. Although he was long a crypto-skeptic, President Trump has taken action to establish regulatory policies. A new report was released on November 24 by the House Judiciary Committee Democrats, explaining how the administration of Donald J. Trump has exploited the powers [...]]]>

House Democrats Accuse Trump Administration of Using White House to Boost Family Crypto Ventures

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com
  • Democrats have issued a partisan report claiming President Trump used his position for crypto.
  • Although he was long a crypto-skeptic, President Trump has taken action to establish regulatory policies.

A new report was released on November 24 by the House Judiciary Committee Democrats, explaining how the administration of Donald J. Trump has exploited the powers of the presidency to enrich him and his family. According to the findings, the Trump family has reportedly amassed crypto holdings worth up to US$11.6 billion. In the first half of 2025 alone, they earned more than US$800 million from sales of crypto tokens tied to their ventures.

The report states.

At the time, federal agencies took a stricter approach, launching 70 SEC enforcement actions and levying penalties totaling more than $1.5 billion.

Issuing Crypto Pardons, Influence, and WLF

Over time, the Trump administration tore down key regulatory safeguards, most notably by dissolving the Department of Justice’s National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team, and has also granted pardons to corporate figures in the crypto industry.

One example is that of Changpeng “CZ” Zhao, who faced charges in 2023 and received clemency after he and Binance promoted World Liberty Financial. Back in March, CNF reported that Trump also granted pardons to the executives of BitMEX, Arthur Hayes, Benjamin Delo, and Samuel Reed.

It also points to the President’s January 23 order repealing Biden-era protections for digital assets as a turning point. The administration halted investigations into several donors, including Coinbase, Crypto.com, Kraken, Robinhood, which contributed $2 million to Trump’s inaugural committee, and Ripple (XRP), which reportedly gave $5 million.

A central focus of the report is World Liberty Financial, the crypto enterprise the Trump family launched in 2024. WLF has since rolled out multiple products, including its governance token WLFI and its own stablecoin, USD1, which the report estimates has generated roughly $42 million in revenue.

In Trump’s 2024 financial disclosure, he reported personal income of $57.3 million from WLF. The report also claims the Trump family earned $463 million in the first half of 2025 from the sale of WLFI tokens alone. Democrats argue this created a pipeline through which corporate players could invest in the projects in exchange for influence. One cited example is Justin Sun, founder of Tron, who invested $75 million in WLFI.

The report concludes,

]]>
Market Opportunity
Housecoin Logo
Housecoin Price(HOUSE)
$0,0014316
$0,0014316$0,0014316
-4,63%
USD
Housecoin (HOUSE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration

What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration

The post What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline Legal experts have raised concerns that ABC’s decision to pull “Jimmy Kimmel Live” from its airwaves following the host’s controversial comments about the death of Charlie Kirk, could be because the Trump administration violated free speech protections through a practice known as “jawboning.” Jimmy Kimmel speaks at Disney’s Advertising Upfront on May 13 in New York City. Disney via Getty Images Key Facts Disney-owned ABC announced Wednesday Kimmel’s show will be taken off the air “indefinitely,” which came after ABC affiliate owner Nexstar—which needs Federal Communications Commission approval to complete a planned acquisition of competitor Tegna Inc.—said it would not air the program due to Kimmel’s comments Monday regarding Kirk’s death and the reaction to it. The sudden move drew particular concern because it came only hours after FCC head Brendan Carr called for ABC to “take action” against Kimmel, and cryptically suggested his agency could take action saying, “We can do this the easy way or the hard way.” While ABC and Nexstar have not given any indication their decisions were influenced by Carr’s comments, the timing raised concerns among legal experts that the Trump administration’s threats may have unlawfully coerced ABC and Nexstar to punish Kimmel, which could constitute jawboning. Jawboning refers to “the use of official speech to inappropriately compel private action,” as defined by the Cato Institute, as governments or public officials—who cannot directly punish private actors for speech they don’t like—can use strongman tactics to try and indirectly silence critics or influence private companies’ actions. The practice is fairly loosely defined and there aren’t many legal safeguards dictating how violations of it are enforced, the Knight First Amendment Institute notes, but the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled it can be unlawful and an impermissible First Amendment violation when it involves specific threats. The White…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 07:17
Why Fintech Platforms Are Growing Faster Than Traditional Banks

Why Fintech Platforms Are Growing Faster Than Traditional Banks

Fintech platforms are outpacing traditional banks in growth across nearly every measurable dimension. Customer acquisition rates, revenue growth, geographic expansion
Share
Techbullion2026/03/24 07:58
Japan’s CPI Reveals Critical 1.3% Inflation Rise in February as Core Pressure Eases Unexpectedly

Japan’s CPI Reveals Critical 1.3% Inflation Rise in February as Core Pressure Eases Unexpectedly

BitcoinWorld Japan’s CPI Reveals Critical 1.3% Inflation Rise in February as Core Pressure Eases Unexpectedly TOKYO, Japan — March 2025: Japan’s National Consumer
Share
bitcoinworld2026/03/24 08:10