The IMF warns that tokenization threatens to deepen flash crashes despite promises of faster and lower-cost markets, prompting government intervention.The IMF warns that tokenization threatens to deepen flash crashes despite promises of faster and lower-cost markets, prompting government intervention.

IMF warns tokenization could deepen flash crashes and spur government intervention

2025/11/28 23:15
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

The IMF warns that tokenization threatens to deepen flash crashes despite promises of faster and lower-cost markets, prompting government intervention. Senior IMF economist Itai Agur notes that the nature of tokenized markets allows chains of programs to be stacked on top of each other, presenting opportunities for exponential failure (a domino effect).

Another risk is that many markets could emerge, and if their tokens lack interoperability, markets could become more fragmented. The problem here is that fragmentation may cause markets to fail to deliver faster and cheaper trading, Agur emphasises. 

The fund’s economist also notes that specific policies may be required for tokenization to truly deliver on its promises while limiting risks. He added that governments have rarely been content to stay on the sidelines during necessary adaptations of money, pointing out that governments may take a more active role in the future of tokenization.

IMF’s Agur partly defends tokenization

The senior economist explained that people need money to buy, consume, and save, and owning assets is one common way to save. Meanwhile, he noted that tokens can facilitate faster and cheaper transactions for buying, owning, and selling assets.

According to Agur, tokenized markets help avoid the long chain of intermediaries typically involved in most transactions between investors and companies, such as buying corporate stocks or bonds. He also noted that most conventional transactions, which require a go-between such as a clearinghouse or registrar, have more extended waiting periods for completion. Stressing that time is money in finance.

However, Agur emphasizes that tokenized markets have programs that can automate or reduce the role and functions of intermediaries. He also notes that researchers who have recently studied tokenized markets found significant cost savings. The economist further argued that tokenization’s promise is visible in the numbers, but cautioned that efficiencies from new technologies often come with new risks.

Automated trading has already led to sudden market plunges, according to Agur. He added that tokenized markets can be more volatile, particularly due to their instantaneous execution of trades.

Tokenization offers flexible settlement options

The IMF has been examining the structure of digital assets and tokenized markets for years, and it acknowledges that tokenization is currently more mainstream than an experimental niche. Meanwhile, the fund believes that tokenization offers flexible settlement options.

Tokenization can spur competition between middlemen, making it easier for investors to shop around and switch between brokers for the best price. The fund also noted that tokenization does not cut out all middlemen, but it is transforming the financial industry and reducing the need for specific roles. The IMF pointed out that some specialized intermediaries also reduce market frictions in financial markets at various stages of the asset lifecycle. 

Meanwhile, the IFM observed that tokenization works best when assets and money flow smoothly. The fund also noted that it is easier to accumulate debt through tokenized markets because investors or institutions can use the tokens as collateral to borrow and invest elsewhere.  

However, Agur also argues that while the programmability of tokenized assets makes it easier to develop sophisticated financial products, regulators may not fully understand the inherent risks until it is too late. He pointed out that this was the situation back in the 2008-09 crisis, as the programmability of tokenized assets made it harder for regulators to track potential risks. 

Get $50 free to trade crypto when you sign up to Bybit now

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration

What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration

The post What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline Legal experts have raised concerns that ABC’s decision to pull “Jimmy Kimmel Live” from its airwaves following the host’s controversial comments about the death of Charlie Kirk, could be because the Trump administration violated free speech protections through a practice known as “jawboning.” Jimmy Kimmel speaks at Disney’s Advertising Upfront on May 13 in New York City. Disney via Getty Images Key Facts Disney-owned ABC announced Wednesday Kimmel’s show will be taken off the air “indefinitely,” which came after ABC affiliate owner Nexstar—which needs Federal Communications Commission approval to complete a planned acquisition of competitor Tegna Inc.—said it would not air the program due to Kimmel’s comments Monday regarding Kirk’s death and the reaction to it. The sudden move drew particular concern because it came only hours after FCC head Brendan Carr called for ABC to “take action” against Kimmel, and cryptically suggested his agency could take action saying, “We can do this the easy way or the hard way.” While ABC and Nexstar have not given any indication their decisions were influenced by Carr’s comments, the timing raised concerns among legal experts that the Trump administration’s threats may have unlawfully coerced ABC and Nexstar to punish Kimmel, which could constitute jawboning. Jawboning refers to “the use of official speech to inappropriately compel private action,” as defined by the Cato Institute, as governments or public officials—who cannot directly punish private actors for speech they don’t like—can use strongman tactics to try and indirectly silence critics or influence private companies’ actions. The practice is fairly loosely defined and there aren’t many legal safeguards dictating how violations of it are enforced, the Knight First Amendment Institute notes, but the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled it can be unlawful and an impermissible First Amendment violation when it involves specific threats. The White…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 07:17
Why Fintech Platforms Are Growing Faster Than Traditional Banks

Why Fintech Platforms Are Growing Faster Than Traditional Banks

Fintech platforms are outpacing traditional banks in growth across nearly every measurable dimension. Customer acquisition rates, revenue growth, geographic expansion
Share
Techbullion2026/03/24 07:58
Japan’s CPI Reveals Critical 1.3% Inflation Rise in February as Core Pressure Eases Unexpectedly

Japan’s CPI Reveals Critical 1.3% Inflation Rise in February as Core Pressure Eases Unexpectedly

BitcoinWorld Japan’s CPI Reveals Critical 1.3% Inflation Rise in February as Core Pressure Eases Unexpectedly TOKYO, Japan — March 2025: Japan’s National Consumer
Share
bitcoinworld2026/03/24 08:10