Author: Prathik Desai Compiled by: Chopper The financial logic of Bitcoin miners is quite simple: they survive on fixed protocol revenue but face fluctuating real-world expenses. When markets are volatile, they are the first to feel the pressure on their balance sheets. Miners' revenue comes from selling the Bitcoins they mine, while their operating costs are primarily the electricity bills for the heavy computers needed to run mining. This week, I tracked some key data for Bitcoin miners: the network pays them, the cost of earning that revenue, the remaining profit after deducting cash outlays, and the final net profit after accounting. With Bitcoin prices currently below $90,000, miners are facing difficulties. Over the past two months, miners' average 7-day revenue has dropped 35% from $60 million to $40 million. Let me break down the key logic in detail. Bitcoin's revenue mechanism is fixed and encoded in the protocol. The mining reward for each block is 3.125 Bitcoins, the average block time is 10 minutes, and approximately 144 blocks are generated per day, which is equivalent to approximately 450 Bitcoins mined daily across the entire network. Based on a 30-day calculation, global Bitcoin miners have mined a total of 13,500 Bitcoins, which, at the current Bitcoin price of approximately $88,000, is worth approximately $1.2 billion. However, if this revenue is distributed across the record-breaking 1078 EH/s (Ahashi) hashrate, the final revenue per TH/s (Tehashi) hashrate is only 3.6 cents per day. This is the entire economic foundation supporting the network operation of this $1.7 trillion network. (Note: 1 EH/s = 10(18) H/s; 1 TH/s = 10¹² H/s) In terms of cost, electricity is the most critical variable, and its level depends on the mining location and the efficiency of the mining machine. If miners use modern S21-level mining rigs (consuming 17 joules per terahash) and have access to cheap electricity, they can still achieve cash profits. However, if the mining rigs are primarily older or involve high electricity costs, each hash calculation will increase costs. At current hash prices (affected by network difficulty, Bitcoin price, block subsidies, and transaction fees), an S19 mining rig using $0.06 per kilowatt-hour of electricity can barely break even. If network difficulty increases, Bitcoin price drops slightly, or electricity costs surge, its economic viability will further deteriorate. Let me analyze this using some specific data. In December 2024, CoinShares estimated that the cash cost for publicly traded mining companies to mine one Bitcoin in the third quarter of 2024 was approximately $55,950. Now, Cambridge University estimates this cost has risen to approximately $58,500. Actual mining costs vary among different miners: Marathon Digital (ticker symbol MARA), the world's largest publicly traded Bitcoin mining company, had an average energy cost of $39,235 per Bitcoin in the third quarter of 2025; the second-largest publicly traded mining company, Riot Platforms (ticker symbol RIOT), had a cost of $46,324. Despite Bitcoin's price falling 30% from its peak to $86,000, these mining companies are still profitable. But this is not the whole story. Miners also need to consider non-cash expenses, including depreciation, impairment, and stock option compensation, all of which together make mining a capital-intensive industry. Once these costs are factored in, the total cost of mining one Bitcoin can easily exceed $100,000. Mining costs of top mining companies Marathon and Riot MARA mines using both its own mining rigs and third-party hosted equipment. MARA incurs electricity, depreciation, and hosting fees. A rough calculation shows that its total mining cost per Bitcoin exceeds $110,000. Even CoinShares' estimate of the total mining cost in December 2024 was approximately $106,000. On the surface, the Bitcoin mining industry appears stable. Cash margins are high, accounting profits are expected, and the scale of operations is large enough to easily raise funds. However, a deeper analysis reveals why more and more miners are choosing to hold onto their mined Bitcoins, or even increase their holdings on the market, rather than selling them immediately. Bitcoin reserves of leading mining companies Stronger mining companies like MARA are able to cover their costs because they have ancillary businesses and access to capital markets. However, many other mining companies could face losses if the network difficulty were to increase again. In summary, the mining industry presents two coexisting break-even scenarios: The first type is large, industrial-grade mining companies, which possess efficient mining rigs, cheap electricity, and low-capital balance sheets. For them, daily cash flow would only turn negative when the price of Bitcoin drops from $86,000 to $50,000. Currently, they generate over $40,000 in cash profit per Bitcoin mined, but whether they can achieve accounting profitability at the current price level varies from company to company. The second group is the remaining miners, who will struggle to break even once depreciation, impairment, and stock option expenses are factored in. Even with a conservative estimate of the total cost per Bitcoin between $90,000 and $110,000, this means many miners have already fallen below their economic break-even point. They are able to continue mining because their cash costs haven't fallen below their cost basis, but their accounting costs have exceeded it. This may prompt more miners to choose to hold onto their Bitcoin rather than sell it now. As long as cash flow remains positive, miners will continue mining. At a price level of $88,000, the system appears stable, but this is predicated on miners not selling Bitcoin. Once the price of Bitcoin falls further, or miners are forced to liquidate their positions, they will approach the break-even point. Therefore, while the price crash will continue to affect retail investors and traders, it is unlikely to harm miners at present. However, the situation could worsen if miners' access to financing becomes more limited, at which point the growth flywheel will break, and miners will have to increase investment in ancillary services to maintain operations.Author: Prathik Desai Compiled by: Chopper The financial logic of Bitcoin miners is quite simple: they survive on fixed protocol revenue but face fluctuating real-world expenses. When markets are volatile, they are the first to feel the pressure on their balance sheets. Miners' revenue comes from selling the Bitcoins they mine, while their operating costs are primarily the electricity bills for the heavy computers needed to run mining. This week, I tracked some key data for Bitcoin miners: the network pays them, the cost of earning that revenue, the remaining profit after deducting cash outlays, and the final net profit after accounting. With Bitcoin prices currently below $90,000, miners are facing difficulties. Over the past two months, miners' average 7-day revenue has dropped 35% from $60 million to $40 million. Let me break down the key logic in detail. Bitcoin's revenue mechanism is fixed and encoded in the protocol. The mining reward for each block is 3.125 Bitcoins, the average block time is 10 minutes, and approximately 144 blocks are generated per day, which is equivalent to approximately 450 Bitcoins mined daily across the entire network. Based on a 30-day calculation, global Bitcoin miners have mined a total of 13,500 Bitcoins, which, at the current Bitcoin price of approximately $88,000, is worth approximately $1.2 billion. However, if this revenue is distributed across the record-breaking 1078 EH/s (Ahashi) hashrate, the final revenue per TH/s (Tehashi) hashrate is only 3.6 cents per day. This is the entire economic foundation supporting the network operation of this $1.7 trillion network. (Note: 1 EH/s = 10(18) H/s; 1 TH/s = 10¹² H/s) In terms of cost, electricity is the most critical variable, and its level depends on the mining location and the efficiency of the mining machine. If miners use modern S21-level mining rigs (consuming 17 joules per terahash) and have access to cheap electricity, they can still achieve cash profits. However, if the mining rigs are primarily older or involve high electricity costs, each hash calculation will increase costs. At current hash prices (affected by network difficulty, Bitcoin price, block subsidies, and transaction fees), an S19 mining rig using $0.06 per kilowatt-hour of electricity can barely break even. If network difficulty increases, Bitcoin price drops slightly, or electricity costs surge, its economic viability will further deteriorate. Let me analyze this using some specific data. In December 2024, CoinShares estimated that the cash cost for publicly traded mining companies to mine one Bitcoin in the third quarter of 2024 was approximately $55,950. Now, Cambridge University estimates this cost has risen to approximately $58,500. Actual mining costs vary among different miners: Marathon Digital (ticker symbol MARA), the world's largest publicly traded Bitcoin mining company, had an average energy cost of $39,235 per Bitcoin in the third quarter of 2025; the second-largest publicly traded mining company, Riot Platforms (ticker symbol RIOT), had a cost of $46,324. Despite Bitcoin's price falling 30% from its peak to $86,000, these mining companies are still profitable. But this is not the whole story. Miners also need to consider non-cash expenses, including depreciation, impairment, and stock option compensation, all of which together make mining a capital-intensive industry. Once these costs are factored in, the total cost of mining one Bitcoin can easily exceed $100,000. Mining costs of top mining companies Marathon and Riot MARA mines using both its own mining rigs and third-party hosted equipment. MARA incurs electricity, depreciation, and hosting fees. A rough calculation shows that its total mining cost per Bitcoin exceeds $110,000. Even CoinShares' estimate of the total mining cost in December 2024 was approximately $106,000. On the surface, the Bitcoin mining industry appears stable. Cash margins are high, accounting profits are expected, and the scale of operations is large enough to easily raise funds. However, a deeper analysis reveals why more and more miners are choosing to hold onto their mined Bitcoins, or even increase their holdings on the market, rather than selling them immediately. Bitcoin reserves of leading mining companies Stronger mining companies like MARA are able to cover their costs because they have ancillary businesses and access to capital markets. However, many other mining companies could face losses if the network difficulty were to increase again. In summary, the mining industry presents two coexisting break-even scenarios: The first type is large, industrial-grade mining companies, which possess efficient mining rigs, cheap electricity, and low-capital balance sheets. For them, daily cash flow would only turn negative when the price of Bitcoin drops from $86,000 to $50,000. Currently, they generate over $40,000 in cash profit per Bitcoin mined, but whether they can achieve accounting profitability at the current price level varies from company to company. The second group is the remaining miners, who will struggle to break even once depreciation, impairment, and stock option expenses are factored in. Even with a conservative estimate of the total cost per Bitcoin between $90,000 and $110,000, this means many miners have already fallen below their economic break-even point. They are able to continue mining because their cash costs haven't fallen below their cost basis, but their accounting costs have exceeded it. This may prompt more miners to choose to hold onto their Bitcoin rather than sell it now. As long as cash flow remains positive, miners will continue mining. At a price level of $88,000, the system appears stable, but this is predicated on miners not selling Bitcoin. Once the price of Bitcoin falls further, or miners are forced to liquidate their positions, they will approach the break-even point. Therefore, while the price crash will continue to affect retail investors and traders, it is unlikely to harm miners at present. However, the situation could worsen if miners' access to financing becomes more limited, at which point the growth flywheel will break, and miners will have to increase investment in ancillary services to maintain operations.

What happened to miners after the Bitcoin crash?

2025/11/27 07:00
5 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Author: Prathik Desai

Compiled by: Chopper

The financial logic of Bitcoin miners is quite simple: they survive on fixed protocol revenue but face fluctuating real-world expenses. When markets are volatile, they are the first to feel the pressure on their balance sheets. Miners' revenue comes from selling the Bitcoins they mine, while their operating costs are primarily the electricity bills for the heavy computers needed to run mining.

This week, I tracked some key data for Bitcoin miners: the network pays them, the cost of earning that revenue, the remaining profit after deducting cash outlays, and the final net profit after accounting.

With Bitcoin prices currently below $90,000, miners are facing difficulties. Over the past two months, miners' average 7-day revenue has dropped 35% from $60 million to $40 million.

Let me break down the key logic in detail.

Bitcoin's revenue mechanism is fixed and encoded in the protocol. The mining reward for each block is 3.125 Bitcoins, the average block time is 10 minutes, and approximately 144 blocks are generated per day, which is equivalent to approximately 450 Bitcoins mined daily across the entire network. Based on a 30-day calculation, global Bitcoin miners have mined a total of 13,500 Bitcoins, which, at the current Bitcoin price of approximately $88,000, is worth approximately $1.2 billion. However, if this revenue is distributed across the record-breaking 1078 EH/s (Ahashi) hashrate, the final revenue per TH/s (Tehashi) hashrate is only 3.6 cents per day. This is the entire economic foundation supporting the network operation of this $1.7 trillion network. (Note: 1 EH/s = 10(18) H/s; 1 TH/s = 10¹² H/s)

In terms of cost, electricity is the most critical variable, and its level depends on the mining location and the efficiency of the mining machine.

If miners use modern S21-level mining rigs (consuming 17 joules per terahash) and have access to cheap electricity, they can still achieve cash profits. However, if the mining rigs are primarily older or involve high electricity costs, each hash calculation will increase costs. At current hash prices (affected by network difficulty, Bitcoin price, block subsidies, and transaction fees), an S19 mining rig using $0.06 per kilowatt-hour of electricity can barely break even. If network difficulty increases, Bitcoin price drops slightly, or electricity costs surge, its economic viability will further deteriorate.

Let me analyze this using some specific data.

In December 2024, CoinShares estimated that the cash cost for publicly traded mining companies to mine one Bitcoin in the third quarter of 2024 was approximately $55,950. Now, Cambridge University estimates this cost has risen to approximately $58,500. Actual mining costs vary among different miners: Marathon Digital (ticker symbol MARA), the world's largest publicly traded Bitcoin mining company, had an average energy cost of $39,235 per Bitcoin in the third quarter of 2025; the second-largest publicly traded mining company, Riot Platforms (ticker symbol RIOT), had a cost of $46,324. Despite Bitcoin's price falling 30% from its peak to $86,000, these mining companies are still profitable. But this is not the whole story.

Miners also need to consider non-cash expenses, including depreciation, impairment, and stock option compensation, all of which together make mining a capital-intensive industry. Once these costs are factored in, the total cost of mining one Bitcoin can easily exceed $100,000.

Mining costs of top mining companies Marathon and Riot

MARA mines using both its own mining rigs and third-party hosted equipment. MARA incurs electricity, depreciation, and hosting fees. A rough calculation shows that its total mining cost per Bitcoin exceeds $110,000. Even CoinShares' estimate of the total mining cost in December 2024 was approximately $106,000.

On the surface, the Bitcoin mining industry appears stable. Cash margins are high, accounting profits are expected, and the scale of operations is large enough to easily raise funds. However, a deeper analysis reveals why more and more miners are choosing to hold onto their mined Bitcoins, or even increase their holdings on the market, rather than selling them immediately.

Bitcoin reserves of leading mining companies

Stronger mining companies like MARA are able to cover their costs because they have ancillary businesses and access to capital markets. However, many other mining companies could face losses if the network difficulty were to increase again.

In summary, the mining industry presents two coexisting break-even scenarios:

The first type is large, industrial-grade mining companies, which possess efficient mining rigs, cheap electricity, and low-capital balance sheets. For them, daily cash flow would only turn negative when the price of Bitcoin drops from $86,000 to $50,000. Currently, they generate over $40,000 in cash profit per Bitcoin mined, but whether they can achieve accounting profitability at the current price level varies from company to company.

The second group is the remaining miners, who will struggle to break even once depreciation, impairment, and stock option expenses are factored in.

Even with a conservative estimate of the total cost per Bitcoin between $90,000 and $110,000, this means many miners have already fallen below their economic break-even point. They are able to continue mining because their cash costs haven't fallen below their cost basis, but their accounting costs have exceeded it. This may prompt more miners to choose to hold onto their Bitcoin rather than sell it now.

As long as cash flow remains positive, miners will continue mining. At a price level of $88,000, the system appears stable, but this is predicated on miners not selling Bitcoin. Once the price of Bitcoin falls further, or miners are forced to liquidate their positions, they will approach the break-even point.

Therefore, while the price crash will continue to affect retail investors and traders, it is unlikely to harm miners at present. However, the situation could worsen if miners' access to financing becomes more limited, at which point the growth flywheel will break, and miners will have to increase investment in ancillary services to maintain operations.

Market Opportunity
RealLink Logo
RealLink Price(REAL)
$0.0538
$0.0538$0.0538
-1.71%
USD
RealLink (REAL) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

‘One Battle After Another’ Becomes One Of This Decade’s Best-Reviewed Movies

‘One Battle After Another’ Becomes One Of This Decade’s Best-Reviewed Movies

The post ‘One Battle After Another’ Becomes One Of This Decade’s Best-Reviewed Movies appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline Critics have hailed Paul Thomas Anderson’s “One Battle After Another,” starring Leonardo DiCaprio, as a “masterpiece,” indicating potential Academy Awards success as it boasts near-perfect scores on review aggregators Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes based on early reviews. Leonardo DiCaprio stars in “One Battle After Another,” which opens in theaters next week. (Photo by Jeff Spicer/Getty Images for Warner Bros. Pictures) Getty Images for Warner Bros. Pictures Key Facts “One Battle After Another” boasts a nearly perfect 97 out of a possible 100 on Metacritic based on its first 31 reviews, making it the highest-rated movie of this decade on Metacritic’s best movies of all time list. The movie also has a 96% score on Rotten Tomatoes based on the first 56 reviews, with only two reviews considered “rotten,” or negative. The Associated Press hailed the movie as “an American masterpiece,” noting the movie touches on topical political themes and depicts a society where “gun violence, white power and immigrant deportations recur in an ongoing dance, both farcical and tragic.” The movie stars DiCaprio as an ex-revolutionary who reunites with former accomplices to rescue his 16-year-old daughter when she goes missing, and Anderson has said the movie was inspired by the 1990 novel, “Vineland.” Most critics have described the movie as an action thriller with notable chase scenes, which jumps in time from DiCaprio’s character’s early days with fictional revolutionary group, the French 75, to about 15 years later, when he is pursued by foe and military leader Captain Steven Lockjaw, played by Sean Penn. The Warner Bros.-produced film was made on a big budget, estimated to be between $130 million and $175 million, and co-stars Penn, Benicio del Toro, Regina Hall and Teyana Taylor. When Will ‘one Battle After Another’ Open In Theaters And Streaming? The move opens in…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 07:35
Economic policies are chasing investors away from US – Mercer

Economic policies are chasing investors away from US – Mercer

The post Economic policies are chasing investors away from US – Mercer appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A wave of clients are shifting away from U.S. assets as investors react to President Donald Trump’s trade and interest-rate agenda, according to Mercer LLC. The consulting firm says concern over tariffs, pressure on the Federal Reserve, a swelling budget deficit and the risk of a softer dollar are pushing money to Europe, Japan and other markets. Hooman Kaveh, Mercer’s global chief investment officer, said a rising share of the firm’s 3,900 clients, together overseeing about $17 trillion, are reducing U.S. exposure. The opening weeks in the early phase of Trump’s second term “has been a trigger for genuine diversification,” he noted in an interview this week. “We’re certainly seeing that in client portfolios where flows are toward diversifying markets, geographies, asset classes, currencies.” Market nerves were evident in early April after Trump’s “Liberation Day” announcement, when both U.S. stocks and Treasuries fell before rebounding. Even so, U.S. shares have trailed many overseas benchmarks in 2025 for dollar-based investors. Kaveh said investors are struggling to price the tariff path because the effects can cut two ways: either squeeze company margins or get passed through to consumers and lift inflation. “If you have a situation where tariffs are going to push prices up, and the weaker dollar potentially can increase inflation, that would cause the Fed much more of a challenge to cut rates,” he added. As mentione in a Bloomberg report, he called the White House’s preference for a weaker dollar “the Achilles heel to the current approach” since it can magnify the inflation impulse from tariffs. Where the money is going Trump’s repeated criticism of Chair Jerome Powell, saying he has been slow to lower borrowing costs, along with the president’s move to fire Governor Lisa Cook, is further encouraging clients to step back from the U.S., according to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 13:17
Stand Out And Boost Brand Recognition With High-Quality Tag Choices

Stand Out And Boost Brand Recognition With High-Quality Tag Choices

In the world of business, a product speaks louder than words. Because a customer makes a first eye-catching contact with a product, it speaks by its looks and quality
Share
Techbullion2026/03/08 14:20